Frankly, this sounds to me to be exactly what the email suggests it is... an attempt to protect volunteers from harassment by the kind
of conspiracy nuts that Surface Stations is likely to inspire.
Not exact matches
But, hey, I've been up for over 24 hrs, so I thought I'd better let everyone know I am not some kind
of secret -
conspiracy nut.
It's a really poorly done photoshop and the
conspiracy nuts are already starting to use that picture as proof
of a coverup.
While some like to give in to
conspiracy theories and prophesize the end
of the world — best just not sound like a crazy
nut and live a good life loving others.
Contrary to popular conception, believing in
conspiracy theories «is not the sole province
of the proverbial
nut - job,» the researchers write.
After all, squirrels can't use direct - mailing lists to keep track
of the
nuts that sustain them the way that, say, vein - popping
conspiracy - purveying radio hosts can.
It is not just in the US — the Europeans have looked at it, the Brits have looked at it, the international Cochrane Collaboration have looked at it
Of course the
nuts try to explain all this away by postulating some vast global
conspiracy that has been operating for decades to suppress cancer cures.
There are even versions
of tin foil hat
conspiracy theorist
nuts in sugar online dating world too.
Yet it's also full
of energy and humour, riding shotgun as wheelchair - bound Jeff brawls with redneck
conspiracy nuts, or sets off an LSD - fuelled police chase.
This,
of course, drove a ton
of beginning indie writers (who watch every sale) completely
nuts and sent off waves
of conspiracy theories, just as what happened in 2012.
One had me swinging like Tarzan under the foundations
of a bridge to find a
conspiracy nuts den.
You guys would go
nuts over a
conspiracy of data manipulation and call the author
of that paper all sorts
of terrible names.
Both the 9/11
conspiracy nuts and the your individual support department are limited subsets
of larger groups - people who have investigated 9/11 and support departments across the nation, respectively.
A cherry pie that serves your argument not at all, but still, a skewing
of views that tends to cater to paranoid
conspiracy theorists and those who think libertarian means, «gubmint = satan» (which view is not hard to empathize with, however it is clearly
nuts).
However I will stipulate that my comment was meant to imply that Brandon's competence, was in the direction
of forcing long answers to simple statements he makes, like calling anyone that implies that billions
of political dollars and the politics
of government power have a corrupting influence on the science, a «paranoid
conspiracy nut» So, in a sense, I was politely calling him a competent troll.
I'm probably one
of those
conspiracy wing
nuts for wondering if it because human production
of CH4 is swamped by natural production.
Sure, there are
conspiracy nuts who take information
of scientists out
of context, but when it comes time for accurate vetting, the people who take your experimental data and procedure out
of context don't tend to have the academic strength against it.