Sentences with phrase «of copyright in works»

As the premier firm for copyright litigation and counseling, we also assist clients in securing transfers of copyright in works prepared by their employees and in works commissioned from independent contractors.

The year date may be omitted where a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work, with accompanying text matter, if any, is reproduced in or on greeting cards, postcards, stationery, jewelry, dolls, toys, or any useful articles; and (3) the name of the owner of copyright in the work, or an abbreviation by which the name can be recognized, or a generally known alternative designation of the owner.

That section contains the following language:»... the owner of copyright in a work or other subject - matter is not entitled to any remedy other than an injunction against a provider of information location tools who infringes that copyright by making or caching a reproduction of the work or other subject matter.»

Although staying safe in Never - Never Land helped him avoid entering the grown - up world, one thing that couldn't be avoided was the inevitable expiration of copyright in the work in which he appears.

The author of the work is also the first owner of copyright in the work, unless the author happens to have created the work in the course of employment, in which case it is the employer who is the first owner of copyright.

Under the Copyright Act, this creates a default presumption that the surveyor is the owner of copyright in the work.

Section 12 of the Copyright Act provides thatthe Crown is the owner of copyright in any work that «is, or has been, prepared or published by or under the direction or control of Her Majesty -LSB-...]».

Not exact matches

Copyright protection is created the moment your work is fixed in a «tangible form of expression» (paper copy, CD, disk, videotaped performance, and the like) for the first time.

The Copyright Act of 1976 further clarified copyright protection: A copyright owner now has the exclusive right to reproduce the work; prepare spin - off works based on the copyrighted work; and to sell, perform and / or display the copyrighted work iCopyright Act of 1976 further clarified copyright protection: A copyright owner now has the exclusive right to reproduce the work; prepare spin - off works based on the copyrighted work; and to sell, perform and / or display the copyrighted work icopyright protection: A copyright owner now has the exclusive right to reproduce the work; prepare spin - off works based on the copyrighted work; and to sell, perform and / or display the copyrighted work icopyright owner now has the exclusive right to reproduce the work; prepare spin - off works based on the copyrighted work; and to sell, perform and / or display the copyrighted work in public.

In most cases, you can register your copyright with the federal copyright office by mailing two nonreturnable copies of the work with an application and $ 45 fee.

Copyright applies to creative works such as books and movies (and this column), but also to software, which at its core is another form of writing, albeit in code.

Here are some of the most common: Copyright / Trademark: According to the United States Copyright Office, copyright is «a form of protection grounded in the US Constitution and granted by law for original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expressioCopyright / Trademark: According to the United States Copyright Office, copyright is «a form of protection grounded in the US Constitution and granted by law for original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expressioCopyright Office, copyright is «a form of protection grounded in the US Constitution and granted by law for original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expressiocopyright is «a form of protection grounded in the US Constitution and granted by law for original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expression.»

A lawyer and author of several books, Höffner's new two - volume work, Geschichte und Wesen des Urheberrechts (his preferred English translation is The History and Nature of Copyright) contends that the German states» 19th - century transformation from an agricultural backwater to an industrial power the equal of Britain was due in part to their relaxed attitude toward copyright and intellectual propeCopyright) contends that the German states» 19th - century transformation from an agricultural backwater to an industrial power the equal of Britain was due in part to their relaxed attitude toward copyright and intellectual propecopyright and intellectual property (IP).

«To place defendants» argument in a real world context,» she wrote, «they assert that for the payment of approximately $ 100 a year to the Copyright Office (the payment for a Section 111 compulsory license) and without compliance with the strictures of the Communications Act or plaintiffs» consent, that they are entitled to use and profit from the plaintiffs» copyrighted works.»

Changes to copyright law in 1998 greatly extended the rights of authors and, as a result, few works entered the public domain in the United States for two decades.

While some rights holders have argued that the standard for a substantial is very low (the National Post recently argued in a case that «even the reproduction of a small number of words in a newspaper article can be an impermissible reproduction»), the Copyright Board says that its preliminary view is that «copying of a few pages or a small percentage from a book that is not a collection of short works, such as poems, is not substantial.»

Canada recently passed the Copyright Modernization Act, which was created in response to U.S. government and corporate interests working in a sophisticated fashion to advance American interests at the expense of other countries, including our own.

In January, the troubled US photography firm saw its stock price jump 44 % after it announced the launch of KodakCoin, a cryptocurrency designed to work with its new blockchain - based copyright platform for photographers, KodakOne.

It is axiomatic among many of my American friends in the content industry that copyright protection in the US, while not perfect, is better than the protection afforded to copyrighted works in Canada.

It offers an oppor - tunity to study systematically the interaction of several copyright issues: including the rights (or lack thereof) of exclusive licensees as plaintiffs in parallel import situations, the distinction between exclusive licensees and assignees, the nature of works of authorship, the characteristics of copy - right infringement, the status of copyrightable works when used as trade - marked logos, the limits (if any) of concurrent copyright and trade - mark protection, and even the distinction between trade - mark, copyright, and patent as autonomous yet related legal regimes.

The work is also freely available in MP3 format as an audiobook through Librivox, a volunteer online project to make out - of - copyright works available in audio format, at Librivox.org.

The work is also freely available in MP3 format as an audiobook through Librivox, a volunteer project to make out - of - copyright works available in audio format, at Librivox.org.

Since the works are long out of copyright, they are freely available in various electronic formats, including ones suitable for ebook readers, or can be read online at the Project Gutenberg webste at Gutenberg.org.

«When the text is quoted in accordance with the requirements above, notice of copyright must appear on the t «itle or copyright page or opening screen of the work.

By rejuvenating copyright to certain open public website operates, and needing royal family obligations and confining kind works following twelve months right after renewal, institutions the first overstepped its constitutional power and failed to fully guard 1st amendment interests of dependency parties in the works.

Public domain refers to the body of creative works and knowledge in which no person, government or organization has any proprietary interest such as a copyright.

If anyone wants to reproduce your work or a portion of it, it must fall within one of the exceptions to copyright in the Copyright Act (Ccopyright in the Copyright Act (CCopyright Act (Cth) 1968.

So now you have the basics of copyright and defamation as they relate to issues in food blogging, how do you protect your own work?

You shall not Post Content that: (1) infringes any proprietary rights of any third party; (2) violates any law or regulation; (3) is defamatory or trade libelous; (4) is harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, intimidating, profane, pornographic, hateful, racially, ethnically or sexually discriminatory or otherwise objectionable in any way or that otherwise violates any right of another; (5) encourages conduct that would violate any conduct prohibited by this Agreement; (6) restricts or inhibits any other user from using the Website; (7) is or amounts to an unsolicited advertisement, promotion, or other form of solicitation; (8) impersonates any person or entity or that directly or indirectly attempts to gain unauthorized access to any portion of the Website or any computer, software, or data of any person, organization or entity that uses or accesses the Website; (9) provides or create links to external sites that violate the Agreement; (10) is intended to harm, exploit, solicit, or collect personally identifiable information of, any individual under the age of 18 («Minor») in any way; (11) invades anyone's privacy by attempting to harvest, collect, store, or publish private or personally identifiable information without their foreknowledge and willing consent or distributes or contains viruses or any other technologies that may harm the Website or any of its users; (12) is copyrighted, protected by trade secret or otherwise subject to third - party proprietary rights, including privacy and publicity rights, unless you are the owner of such rights or have permission from the rightful owner to post the material and to grant Non-GMO Project all of the license rights granted herein; and / or (13) contains or promotes an illegal or unauthorized copy of another person's copyrighted work.

If you believe that your work has been copied and posted on the Website in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please send the following information to our Copyright Agent (see 17 U.S.C. § 512 (c)(3) for further detail): (i) a description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed; (ii) a description of where the allegedly infringed material is located on the Website; (iii) a written statement that you have a good - faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (iv) your address, telephone number, and email address so that Non-GMO Project is able to contact you; (v) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; and (vi) a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the information in your report is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner'copyright infringement, please send the following information to our Copyright Agent (see 17 U.S.C. § 512 (c)(3) for further detail): (i) a description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed; (ii) a description of where the allegedly infringed material is located on the Website; (iii) a written statement that you have a good - faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (iv) your address, telephone number, and email address so that Non-GMO Project is able to contact you; (v) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; and (vi) a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the information in your report is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner'Copyright Agent (see 17 U.S.C. § 512 (c)(3) for further detail): (i) a description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed; (ii) a description of where the allegedly infringed material is located on the Website; (iii) a written statement that you have a good - faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (iv) your address, telephone number, and email address so that Non-GMO Project is able to contact you; (v) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; and (vi) a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the information in your report is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner'copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (iv) your address, telephone number, and email address so that Non-GMO Project is able to contact you; (v) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; and (vi) a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the information in your report is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner'copyright interest; and (vi) a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the information in your report is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner'copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner'copyright owner's behalf.

Without limiting the generality of any terms or conditions set forth herein, in using the Site, you may not transmit or solicit: (a) any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane or indecent information of any kind, including images and language; (b) any message that constitutes, or encourages or incites conduct that would constitute, a criminal offense or gives rise to civil liability; or (c) any information, software or other material which violates or infringes upon the rights of others, including material which is an invasion of privacy or publicity rights or which is protected by copyright, trademark or other proprietary right, or derivative works with respect thereto, without first obtaining permission from the owner or right holder.

If you believe that your work has been copied and is accessible on this Site in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, you may notify the Action Network Group by providing the following information (as required by the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. scopyright infringement, you may notify the Action Network Group by providing the following information (as required by the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. sCopyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. sCopyright Act, 17 U.S.C. sec. 512):

Nothing stated or implied in this site is designed to grant any licence or right under any copyright or other intellectual property rights of World Rugby or any third party or to use any names, logos, pictures, trade marks or other works or content featured on the site.

Except as expressly authorized by us, you agree not to modify, rent, distribute, lease, loan, sell or exploit for any commercial purpose any portion of the Service, use of the Service, or access to the Service, and not to create derivative works based on the Service, in whole or in part for your personal, non-commercial use only, provided you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices.

If you believe that your work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please provide MomsTeam's Agent for Notice of claims of copyright or other intellectual property infringement («Agent») the written information specified below: (1) An electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; (2) A description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed upon, or if multiple copyright works at a single online site are covered by a single notification, a representative list of such works at that site; (3) A description of where the material that you claim is infringing is located on the Web site; (4) Your address, telephone number, and e-mail address; (5) A statement by you that you have a good - faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (6) A statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf.

By submitting content to this Mead Johnson Nutrition website, you automatically grant Mead Johnson Nutrition, or warrant that the owner of such content has expressly granted Mead Johnson Nutrition, the royalty - free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, and distribute the content (in whole or in part) worldwide and / or to incorporate it into other works in any form, media or technology now known or hereafter developed, for the full term of any copyright that may exist in such content.

In 2012, ORG won Liberty's Human Rights Campaigner of Year award alongside 38 Degrees, for work on issues from copyright to the Snooper's Charter.

As one response, some corporate copyright owners have attempted to use digital rights management software to control how owners of copies of individual works can use them, sparking in turn what is essentially a worldwide citizen revolt.

First, it's a piece of music intended to make a political point about a modern conflict, one inherent in the nature of networked digital communications — authors and copyright holders have long profited from creative works by charging to distribute them, but in a digital world, books, music and movies can be made in unlimited copies and shared essentially for free.

Thus the difficult point was to weigh the interests of copyright owners, who occasionally spend hundreds of millions (as in the case of Hollywood movies) to create their works, and who have a right for setting the price of the products of these investments as well as a legal right that that right is enforced by the state.

In addition, by submitting any entry to the Contest, Participants hereby represent and warrant that the submitted work or information does not and shall not infringe on any copyright or other right of any third party, and Participant has the right to grant any and all rights and licenses granted to Sponsor herein, including but not limited to all necessary rights under copyright, free and clear of any claims or encumbrances.

4.2.9 Practice Inter Library Loan (ILL) of articles or components of the Licensed Materials for noncommercial use in compliance with Section 108 of the United States Copyright Law (17 USC 108, «limitations on exclusive rights: Reproduction by libraries and archives») and clause 3 for the Guidelines for Proviso of Subsection 108 (g)(2) prepared by the National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted works.

Copyright The materials on this Website are protected by United States copyright law except that no copyright is claimed in any work of the US goCopyright The materials on this Website are protected by United States copyright law except that no copyright is claimed in any work of the US gocopyright law except that no copyright is claimed in any work of the US gocopyright is claimed in any work of the US government.

Copyright The materials on the Science Website are protected by United States copyright law except that no copyright is claimed in any work of the US goCopyright The materials on the Science Website are protected by United States copyright law except that no copyright is claimed in any work of the US gocopyright law except that no copyright is claimed in any work of the US gocopyright is claimed in any work of the US government.

The complaint claims that Mallon co-owns the copyright to the Neuron submission, along with his co-authors, and that, by using the work in the PLOS Biology paper and signing a Creative Commons Attribution License, Marshall and Goebel have «destroyed the value of Dr. Mallon's copyrighted Neuron Paper.»

Therefore, the motion states, «[u] nder basic copyright law, as joint owners of the copyright in the original work, the Defendants had carte blanche to use as much or as little of the original work in subsequent works.»

As defined by Brown University in its copyright policy, however, «[c] opyrightable works of scholarly research, course materials or artistic works made by faculty members would not be considered Works Made for Hire and are the property of the author or authors.&rworks of scholarly research, course materials or artistic works made by faculty members would not be considered Works Made for Hire and are the property of the author or authors.&rworks made by faculty members would not be considered Works Made for Hire and are the property of the author or authors.&rWorks Made for Hire and are the property of the author or authors.»

The 186 member states of the World Intellectual Property Organization came to a historic agreement to remove copyright obstacles that have hampered the global availability of textbooks and other published works in accessible formats such as braille, large print and audio.

Everyone could enforce their copyright in the collection of their words and other «works», or in their own life as art.

The new ruling also states that internet search engines, web hosting sites, internet service providers (ISPs), domain name registrars and domain name registries cease facilitating «any or all domain names and websites through which Defendant Sci - Hub engages in unlawful access to, use, reproduction, and distribution of the ACS Marks or ACS's Copyrighted Works.»