Sentences with phrase «of crash testing did»

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's latest round of crash testing didn't go well for one of America's most popular SUVs.

Not exact matches

Well, what didn't they like about the Impreza: Consumer Reports praised the Subaru for its ride, handling, interior space, intuitive controls, safety tech, great crash - test results, its all - wheel - drive system, and the cargo - hauling ability of its hatchback variant.

Neither does it survive a basic common - sense test: Buying insurance against a market crash from other market participants is no different than buying a policy against a crash of the insurance industry from an insurance company.

Cherilus did his best impression of a crash - test dummy and went flying onto his side.

During that time, the prevalence of testing drivers for marijuana use did not change appreciably, federal fatal - crash data show.

We did crash tests and we'll do a filming day with the new car before the start of the winter test at Barcelona.»

Also, a standard «sled bench» used for crash tests does not simulate the effects of having a front seat.

This car seat if engineered and crash tested to meet or exceed the US standard FMVSS 213, so you don't have to worry about safety of your child.

They crash test the seats with what you buy them with and so if it doesn't have it that means it hasn't been crash tested and I don't think that any of us wants our babies to be crash test dummies so it's just best to avoid them.

So what I did was I recruited 28 test subjects and had them complete three laps on the game Gran Turismo 3 for PlayStation 2; and they had a steering wheel, an acceleration [and] brake pad to simulate a real driving experience, and I counted the number of crashes they made during each lap, which was the number of times they hit the wall and also the number of times that they deviated from the course.

Date Out Of Your League is more than a crash course on how to do it — it's a tried and tested formula for dating success that tells you how to get the women you've wanted, but never thought you could have — until now., and sex in no time.

I got to the end of chapter eight, «This Is Not a Test,» and could discern only three reform ideas from Friedman: embark on an «all - hands - on - deck, no - holds - barred, no - budget - too - large crash program for science and engineering education»; make community college affordable for everyone; and scold parents into doing a better job.

Although $ 25 million is, well, $ 25 million... most of the costs associated with purchasing the Common Core compliant computers and expanding Internet Bandwidth so the new test doesn't crash the school's Internet will fall on local property taxpayers.

The 2017 model year QX60 did quite well in crash tests, with top scores from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety across the board (with the exception of headlight performance, judged to be poor).

(We don't test for crash safety, just for fit and ease of installation in all our test cars.)

Safety, Features & Pricing The Beetle convertible has not been crash - tested; because of its structural differences, ratings for the coupe do not carry over.

Although buyers will be saving at the pump, the Prius didn't do too hot in an Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crash test, and we've found recent versions offer all the driving enjoyment of an empty cardboard box.

The IIHS annually recognizes vehicles that do the best job of protecting people in front, side, rollover and rear crashes based on good rating in a series of tests conducted by the Institute.

The two - door Wrangler earned a Marginal rating in the Institute's newer, small - overlap frontal - offset test (which concentrates crash forces on a smaller section of the front bumper), but in fairness, most compact SUVs have done poorly in this test.

On Youtube there is a 23 min long CR video talking about the latest CR reliability report that is pretty interesting # 18 I believe it has to do with the poor results of the crash tests, ditto for the new Corolla.

Detroit: Only three of seven midsize SUVs from the 2015 model year performed well in front - end crash tests done by an insurance industry group.

Originally, when they were called Venture, they did poorly in most of the crash tests, but they changed it enough before renaming it Uplander, that it did much better in the crash tests.

The 2017 Dodge Journey did well in government crash testing, and received the top score of «Good» in several categories of Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crash testing.

The Challenger doesn't perform well in small overlap crash testing, scoring «Marginal» results from the IIHS, but scored best results of Good for the moderate front overlap and side impact test.

Adam Frost, Ford Chief Engineer, said that the company did a lot of simulations and crash tests in order to make the pickup model such a safe model.

The old term «They sure don't build»em like they used to» should always be followed up with a «Good,» because modern cars perform better in crash tests than any of the land yachts of the 1970s.

However, none of these three vehicles could even score Good on all its crash tests, something mainstream cars in all categories now do with ease.

Not only does it post superb crash test ratings and evaluations, but also its large suite of standard and available safety technologies makes it the top pick if staying safe in a collision (or avoiding a collision altogether) is your number one priority.

Consumer Reports compiled a list of new and used vehicles that provide balanced performance in CR tests, have had average or better reliability, come with standard ESC, and did well in independent crash tests.

Although the tests IIHS conducts are good predictors of the results of a crash, how do older vehicles compare in the real world as safety progresses?

The upshot of this situation is that now cars without the most advanced safety systems and which do not score a «Good» rating on all crash tests are still called a Top Safety Pick.

Unlike the moderate overlap frontal crash the IIHS had been performing for years, in which 40 percent of the front of the car contacts a deformable (crushable) barrier, in this new test only 25 percent of the car's frontal crash area — the driver's corner — hits a barrier and this one does not squish.

Only two of nine midsize SUVs got the highest rating in crash tests done by an insurance industry group.

The basic idea behind such crash tests is to make consumers aware of such safety features and how much difference do they make in real world conditions.

When you think that most crashes happend at 80km / h you would really reconsider these tests, because with that kind of speed, it won't do much good.

As of this writing, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has not yet done a full crash test of a WRX.

Audi has done well to retain the TT's compact dimensions in the face of ever increasing pressures to succumb to crash test regulations and safety requirements.

«Manufacturers are paying attention to our tests, and the result is that consumers have a wider choice of vehicles that do a good job of protecting them in the two most common kinds of serious crashes, front and side,» Lund says.

WE»LL BUY YOUR VEHICLE EVEN IF YOU DO N'T BUY OURS.Reviews: * Respectable passenger space for its size; plenty of storage slots; lots of standard equipment for the money; excellent crash test scores.

Top Safety Pick recognizes vehicles that do the best job of protecting people in front, side, and rear crashes based on good ratings in Institute tests.

We decided to do these tests to see how the 2 - doors stack up in protecting people in the 3 most common kinds of crashes.»

Mitsubishi doesn't always score highly in our annual Driver Power owner satisfaction survey, but the Eclipse Cross was awarded five stars for safety by independent crash - testing experts Euro NCAP, who took into account the car's autonomous emergency braking, lane - departure warning and other sophisticated systems that work together to reduce the risk of collision.

Consumers are paying attention to results of the Institute's newest crash test, and two brands that did well in it have reaped higher sales, dealer surveys show.

Sure, they did just fine in NHTSA's physical testing, with a 4 - star ranking for rollover protection and 5 stars for overall safety, frontal - crash protection and side - crash protection, but they also tout a long list of standard and available safety enhancers such as:

They offer a higher degree of biofidelity — in that they perform like bodies do in real life — compared to conventional crash test dummies.

When crash testing a vehicle the IIHS doesn't just hurl hunks of metal at vehicles and they say,» looks good».

Two full - scale crash tests are done: a full - width frontal impact at 50km / h against a deformable element; and a side impact test, also at 50km / h, in which a deformable barrier is driven into the side of the vehicle.

ARLINGTON, Va. — Drivers of vehicles that perform well in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's side - impact crash test are much less likely to die in a real - world left - side crash than drivers of vehicles that do poorly, a new analysis finds.

Side crash dummies do a better job of this but can't record much of the frontal action in these tests.

Two tests of the A4 were conducted because, in the first test, the vehicle's electrical system did not deploy the airbags due to a crash test preparation error.