Sentences with phrase «of cross talk»

Map kinases are involved in different signaling chains responding to a wide range of environmental stimuli and stresses, and a detailed understanding of the cross talk between them is a prerequisite for accurate manipulation of plant traits.

Volatile release stimulated by volicitin may also depend on the octadecanoid pathway, raising the possibility of cross talk between this molecule and the wound - induced expression of defense genes.

Not exact matches

Kiely then glanced over his shoulder before Lakos — the economist doing the talking — crossed through the trading floor to the studio at the end of his 90 - second interview.

The state government has talked up the benefits of its transport plan for the new Perth Stadium, with up to 23,000 patrons expected to take one of the two bridges crossing the Swan River as they exit the stadium after an event.

The life - hacker, entrepreneur and author of «The 4 - Hour Chef» talks about his biggest fear, how to tackle them and how to cross items off a bucket list.

And thanks, in part, to those cross sell numbers that you talked about on every one of those calls.

Instead of driving from one office to another to get their paperwork in order, residents simply cross the gleaming corridors to talk to officials seated at desks in the open - space area.

If you are not talking to the dying about the sacrifice of Jesus Christ and His redemptive work on the cross, if you can not confess that you are a sinner and that you NEED Jesus, you WILL BE CAST INTO THE OUTER DARKNESS loved ones.

Not supporting the ones who want to remove the cross here, but I think you need to leave america too with the rest of the ones you talk of, since the original owners of this land were the Native Americans.

Also thanks for talking about your art on your blog, I recieved a print of yours for my birthday (the one of Jesus coming through the cross)-- I doubt my husband would go ploughing through etsy (except for the rare occasion).

Song has always been a central worship practice for the people of God: The Israelites celebrated in song after crossing the Red Sea, and Paul talks about hymns, psalms and spiritual songs in Ephesians 5.

I happened to be sitting across from and talking to my daughter in law when I noticed a deer crossing the wide expanse of a lawn, I exclaimed, «Look, there's a deer!»

I happened to be sitting across from and talking to my daughter in law when I noticed a unicorn crossing the wide expanse of a lawn, I exclaimed, «Look, there's a unicorn!»

My racist relatives in Mississippi used to talk about the moral decay brought by integrating black people into white society... of cours, e they didn't complain about the cross burnings or lynchings being moral decay..

The Church of England carried on discussions over sexuality at its General Synod (when is it not talking about sexuality) but it was its advice to its schools which hit the front pages that encouraged teachers to let pupils cross dress.

I don't beleive that this the old way of «cross» talk helps people change.

You talk as if you reverence Jesus, yet you continually tell us that what Jesus did on the cross was not enough to insure us of a completed salvation.

And yet most of the time, loving the person in front of me doesn't mean taking up my cross; it just means taking 15 more minutes to talk.

Ask me about resurrection and now I'd be likely to talk to you about the last warm gold light of the afternoon and fresh tea leaves and Cheerios on the floor and Van Gogh's brushstrokes and the way women clap their hands together and cross their legs when they laugh properly.

As we look at Genesis 2:16 - 17, we will be talking about Jesus Christ and Him crucified and how His death on the cross reveals something about the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.

While I struggle with the brutality of the cross, I find that this is the time and place to talk about the cross.

If the fashion in which the basic New Testament proclamation has been interpreted in the preceding chapter has validity, then talk of the resurrection of Christ is a way of affirming that God has received into his own life all that the historical event, designated when we say «Jesus Christ», has included: his human existence as teacher and prophet, as crucified man upon his cross, in continuing relationship of others with him after that death, and along with this what has happened in consequence of his presence and activity in the world.

And @Ashrakay, I do not which Bible you are talking about, Every single thing Bible state is valid and no - nonsence «For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God» It promotes unconditional love even towards the enemies.

She went on to talk about the gap of sin that separates us from God and how the cross of Jesus can bridge that gap if we just believe that Jesus died on the cross.

But the main stress in the sacrament is found not so much in that kind of talk (which may be appropriate enough for an adult) but in the simple words with which the minister of baptism signs the baptized person with the sign of the cross as he or she is «received into the congregation of Christ's flock»: that «hereafter he [or she] shall not be ashamed to confess the faith of Christ crucified, and manfully to fight under his banner, against sin, the world, and the devil, and to continue Christ's faithful soldier and servant unto his [her] life's end.»

Unless you're talking about the guy who was sticking crosses on the graves of the Aurora victims, without thought or care of what those peoples religious affiliation might be.

Any talk of business plans and marketing money, gimmicks and light shows, make my eyes cross.

We don't talk about the devil in our sermons or make a big deal out of Jesus suffering on the cross, Easter is mainly about Rabbits, Chocolate Eggs, Spring flowers, new life, how lovely.

Because of the financial demands of commercial broadcasting, the electronic church can not afford to talk much about suffering, shared need, or requirements of the cross, about justice and humility, and giving one «s self (not just one «s checkbook) in love to one «s neighbor.

Wasp you are right in away It did all come from the point of a spear, stuck into a man on a cross to ensure his death, this scenario set up a scene where within 3 days many folks were talking about this same dude raising from the dead healed of all wounds.

We should talk about what he does for us daily not just him dieing on the cross but the riseing of him three days later.

Much of the church has heeded its clear warning that Christianity can not continue (in Jon Sobrino's words) to talk about cross and resurrection while ignoring the world's crucified peoples and their need for resurrection.

Each interpretation presupposed a particular pattern of eschatological outlook; and it is clear that the earliest Christology was really, as the term suggests, an eschatology, in which the central figure was the same — the risen, glorified Christ who had lived and talked and done mighty works in Galilee but had died on a cross outside Jerusalem, who was now at the right hand of God, and was soon to come in glory to inaugurate the New Age.

That might not have the polish of television talk - show theme music, but that's the sound of bloody cross gospel.»

Theology Ways of talking about Jesus and the cross that were useful in a previous age may not be useful in our time.

After prayer with the disciples at the conclusion of his table talk in the upper room, Jesus descended with them from Mount Zion, crossed the Kidron (Cedron) Valley, and entered a garden on the lower slopes of the Mount of Olives.

We say, «The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing» (1 Cor 1:18), and then head off to our Bible studies and Sunday services where we continue to talk and sing about the blood of Jesus while avoiding or ignoring the hard questions that the watching world is asking.

Furthermore, there is a kind of embarrassment in talking about sacrifice in catechesis, not only because it is seen as something negative in itself but also because it can conjure up what is often seen as the Protestant view of the angry God who seeks blood to be appeased and is only fully appeased when Jesus dies on the cross, shedding His blood in our stead.

We talked for a while about the colors, the graphics, the menus and submenus, and then one of the group members said, «Nowhere on these pages is there a cross,» She was right.

American cheese for me please The way you talk about this stew is cross between romantic poetry and new age smut; which is the best kind of food writing.

A 92nd minute corner gave us the chance to steal all three points, and that we did, although there will be talk of Laurent Koscielny's final touch being with his hand... An Alexis Sanchez cross was whipped in, for Theo to knock toward the back - post, where Oxlade - Chamberlain and Laurent managed to scuffle the ball into the net, and with no time for Burnley to try and level proceedings.

Great for Maureen to talk about giving chance to youth players, then go and sign a expensive big name at 29 years old For Ospina, I know he divided opinion but some statistics does not lie, we conceeded large number of goals from crosses in the 2nd half of the season — he is a consistent goalkeeper and fine shot stopper but never a commanding one.

With Arsenal supposedly one of the main contenders to sign the young striker this summer, Gooners should be crossing our fingers and hoping that these talks between player and club go well for us and it is certainly possible.

The Frenchman's team talk did not seem to have worked though as things were even worse after the restart and but for a great piece of work from Petr Cech to deny Wijnaldum and then a failure from Mitrovic to make proper contact on a cross, Arsenal would have been in big trouble.

so let us pray and keep our fingers crossed we sail through this tough test and come out on the other side unscath before we start talking of people coming back from injuries... as far as am concerned they might all be as useful as drainer trying to scoop water if we are not in ccontention for the title

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

ronny theres another great player we had at arsenal that had a similar problem, the great pires,, i saw in an interview he was talking about when he first came to arsenal how hard he found it to find his game because of the fast fierce nature of the bpl,, but he settled in eventually and the rest is history maybe our ozil could do the same,, fingers crossed

Talking Points Debuchy's attacking prowess is definitely captivating; he can shuttle up and down the flanks all day and, more importantly, put productive crosses into the box, for the lanky strikers in Giroud and Sanogo to make the most of.

Mate move on... Walcott had a couple of decent crosses all game rest of time just a waste of a player... What makes me laugh is the talk of defences fearing his pace... They don't as he doesn't actually pose a goal threat which is what defenders really worry about....

What he was very poor.Bolasie was using him for some skills i do nt know if i watched him clearly or i was blind but Bolasie had a good game against Monreal and Zaha too even all dangerous crosses were from his side.I do nt know what i watched.He was caught out a lot of times and the player you are talking about is koscielny he was at left back several times defending for him.I do nt know how to convince you because i watched him a lot of time and he was beaten easily against Bolasie.