Policymakers have adopted the bovine TB management strategy
of culling badgers, which are thought to act as a reservoir for the disease.
Not exact matches
The
badger cull is a very sensitive and controversial issue with strong views on both sides
of the debate.
Firstly the BBC delayed the publication
of the ruling until after a critical debate on the future
of the
badger cull policy in parliament on March 13th.
Also, during the period the BBC Trust redrafted and delayed the ruling, Owen Paterson gave an interview to Channel 4 News stating that the
culling of badgers had significantly lowered TB in cattle in Ireland.
The
badger cull is one
of the most controversial farming and wildlife policies in the last 40 years.
David Cameron has defended the upcoming
badger cull, saying it takes «political courage» to pursue the policy in the face
of widespread opposition.
Throughout all the twists and turns
of the
badger cull debate, a key argument the government has used to justify the case for
culling has been the apparent success in reducing TB in cattle as a result
of killing
badgers in the Republic
of Ireland.
However, under considerable pressure from farming and landowning interests, the government is clinging to the wreckage
of the policy and plans to continue
badger culling in Somerset and Gloucestershire this summer and possibly extend the
cull into Dorset as well.
If, as Owen Paterson boasted to the Sunday Times in 2013,
badger culling was rolled out to 40 new areas
of England over the next 4 years, the overall cost could exceed # 800 million.
The vast majority
of badgers killed in both pilot
culls were by government employed trap teams, with higher costs than the Welsh government vaccination programme.
This offers David Cameron the chance
of a much needed U-turn on
badger culling ahead
of the next general election.
This was the key reason why Defra would not test any
of the
badgers killed during the pilot
culls for TB, as they knew the results would show a very low level
of disease.
It's now widely anticipated that the independent expert panel reviewing the
badger cull pilots will deliver a report which is very critical
of the policy on cost and effectiveness grounds.
In terms
of effectiveness, we have now learned from Freedom
of Information requests that in the initial six weeks
of the pilot
culls, only 24 %
of the estimated
badger population in Gloucestershire and Somerset were killed by free shooting.
It is now a fair assessment that a four year
badger cull in Gloucester and Somerset would cost in the region
of # 20 million, but would only deliver around # 2.5 million benefit to the tax payer in terms
of reducing the spread
of bovine TB.
Queen guitarist Brian May has declared his willingness to end the «polarisation»
of debate over the
badger cull, following the appointment
of Liz Truss to Defra.
This brings us to the key issue
of the overall costs
of the pilot
culls and a national rollout programme for
badger culling.
He added: «I believe the most positive first step
of a new minister
of the environment would be to end the squandering
of the taxpayer's money on the current hopeless botch
of a
badger cull, and invest instead in the BACVI - the first real positive step towards eradication
of the disease.»
This is why environmentalists will lament her appointment - and worry that when it comes to this autumn's
badger cull, the most controversial issue awaiting her on her desk at Defra, she is unlikely to spend much time resisting the demands
of the National Farmers» Union that the
culls should continue apace.
Badger culling to control the spread
of bovine tuberculosis is one
of the main controversies.
Her comments could disappoint Queen guitarist Brian May, who had declared his willingness to end the «polarisation»
of the debate over the
badger cull following Truss» appointment.
The deaths
of all but 120
of the
badgers being
culled will be checked by the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs via a phone call to the marksmen - a move animal welfare groups has responded to with disbelief.
«Not only is the
badger cull a disastrous failure on scientific and animal welfare grounds, it is also becoming an unacceptable burden on the taxpayer,» Dominic Dyer, CEO of the Badger Trust,
badger cull a disastrous failure on scientific and animal welfare grounds, it is also becoming an unacceptable burden on the taxpayer,» Dominic Dyer, CEO
of the
Badger Trust,
Badger Trust, said.
May is spending some
of his earnings - recently boosted by a Queen tour
of the United States - on funding a
badger and cattle vaccination scheme, which it is hoped could end the need for
culling altogether.
«If the Tories» claims about animal welfare were true, they would have ruled out the return
of foxhunting months ago, rethought their poorly regulated
badger cull, and not tried to water down existing EU standards on animal welfare.»
The RSPCA supported The
Badger Trust's legal challenge of a badger cull in England and we are bitterly disappointed it was not succe
Badger Trust's legal challenge
of a
badger cull in England and we are bitterly disappointed it was not succe
badger cull in England and we are bitterly disappointed it was not successful.
They confirmed that following the collapse
of the pilot
cull last year, many farmers lost confidence in the government's ability to deliver a legal
culling programme against strong public opposition and decided to take the law into their own hands and illegally gas
badgers on their farms.
Opponents
of the
badger cull were jubilant yesterday after MPs were given the go - ahead to officially debate the policy.
The media had some fun last week following the statement from the environment secretary Owen Paterson that the
badgers had «moved the goal posts», triggering an extension
of the pilot
culls in Somerset and Gloucestershire.
I challenged David Cameron to stop the
badger cull not only due to rising costs, animal welfare concerns and public anger, but also because
of widespread criminal activity, which threatens the future
of a species which is protected by law and has lived on this land for 300,000 years.
If we continue to
cull badgers when we can no longer be certain
of the population numbers due to widespread illegal killing, we are running a serious risk
of eradication
of the species from large areas
of the UK.
What is more worrying is that despite growing evidence
of these illegal
badger gassing networks and an investigation by Avon and Somerset Police, the government is now pushing ahead with researching gassing as an option for
culling badgers, which gives an effective green light to these criminal activities.
Yet he said recently that it takes «political courage» to pursue the policy
of culling of badgers in the face
of widespread opposition.
Its website states: «BVZS does not believe there is currently scientific evidence to suggest that a targeted
cull of badgers can contribute positively to the overall control
of bTB in cattle, can be employed in a way that protects animal welfare or is economically viable».
The British Veterinary Zoological Society has added its voice to the massive weight
of scientific and public opposition to the Coalition's proposed
badger cull.
He said: «Now that the
cull company is seeing fewer
badgers on the ground I agree with the decision to stop the pilot
cull for this year and I pay tribute to all those who in the face
of provocation have worked so hard.
Farming minister George Eustice insisted the
cull had been «worthwhile» because, by removing a significant number
of badgers, it would «make a difference to disease control in the area».
Foster was also unable to abstain on the
badger cull vote, due to his ministerial position, but that didn't stop him voicing his regret at Carmichael's disciplining
of him on this issue.
«We don't need any more trials or pilots — the belief that
badger culling represents an effective solution to the problem
of TB in cattle has already been disproven.»
The other involved a large group
of scientists pointing out the flaws in the government's current
badger cull plan.
But, the lesson from the Republic
of Ireland is that a
badger cull, along with other measures, can help control the disease until then.
But despite the use
of snares, the
badger cull in the Republic
of Ireland remains uncontroversial, something that «beggars belief» according to Fintan Kelly from the Irish Wildlife Trust.
In March 2012, the Bow Group released a report opposing the Government's plans to trial
badger culling in England, stating that the findings
of Labour's major
badger culling trials several years earlier were that
culling does not work.
She said she sat «head in hands» when Mr Corbyn wrongly accused the Government
of «gassing»
badgers during the
badger cull - a practice which has been outlawed for decades.
Badgers are ultimately responsible for roughly half
of tuberculosis (TB) in cattle in areas with high TB prevalence, according to new estimates based on data from a previous
badger culling trial.
Such factors included the movement and life - cycles
of badgers and cattle; how cattle are moved and housed; how frequently cattle are tested, different types
of badger culling; and the infection rates between animals.
The model showed that regular and frequent testing
of cattle could eventually lead to the eradication
of the disease, whether or not
badgers were
culled and despite the current test being at most 80 % accurate.
The modelling found that in a region containing about 1.5 m cows
of which 3000 to 15,000 might have TB,
badger culling could account for a reduction
of 12 in the number
of infected cattle.
«Our modelling provides compelling evidence, for those charged with controlling Bovine TB, that investment in increasing the frequency
of cattle testing is a far more effective strategy than
badger culling.»
Modelling produced by researchers at Queen Mary University
of London (QMUL) has found that the only effective potential Bovine Tuberculosis (TB) control strategies are
badger culling, cattle testing, controlling cattle movement, and ceasing the practice
of housing farm cattle together during winter.