Sentences with phrase «of custodial arrangements»

Couples fighting over the custody of their children need psychologists to support their version of a custodial arrangement serving the best interests of the children.

We have been serving the Rochester Region since 1975 What we believe: That maintaining meaningful parent / child relationship should be the primary goal of any custodial arrangement.

Not exact matches

(6) Is there any indication that the psychological and emotional needs and development of the child will suffer due to a particular joint custodial arrangement?

It is always better, in case of couples who are going in for a divorce, to decide upon a custodial arrangement that is agreeable to both parties.

The courts in these cases noted that, under certain custody arrangements, non-custodial parents may have visitation schedules that rival those of the custodial parents and at a similar cost.

Under the terms of the arrangement, Hartford Public Schools provided a physical plant, utilities, custodial and other support services, while Achievement First provided the instruction and operated the school according to its successful model.

ML Wealth does not participate, at this time, in wrap fee programs, which are arrangements between broker - dealers, investment advisers, banks and other financial institutions and affiliated and unaffiliated investment advisers through which the clients of such firms receive discretionary investment advisory, execution, clearing and custodial services in a «bundled» form.

(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary.

A «move - away «case arises when a parent that has joint or sole custody of the child decides to move to a location that is far enough away to disrupt the current custodial arrangement.

The rules say that shared physical custody, regardless of «legal custodial arrangements,» is an appropriate reason for deviation.

However, this case aside, the «bird's nest» custodial arrangement will not be accepted by the judiciary as a co-parenting option to be ordered without the agreement of the parties as a standard practice.

The factors to be considered include: each parent's reasons for seeking or opposing the move, the quality of the relationships between the child and the custodial and noncustodial parents, the impact of the move on the quantity and quality of the child's future contact with the noncustodial parent, the degree to which the custodial parent's and child's life may be enhanced economically, emotionally and educationally by the move, and the feasibility of preserving the relationship between the noncustodial parent and child through suitable visitation arrangements.

Two of the most important factors family lawyers in Leesburg work on are establishing custodial arrangements for children when the parents are separating or have an insufficient agreement in place and are establishing child support.

(4) The court shall attempt to minimize impairment to a parent - child relationship caused by a parent's relocation through alternative arrangements for the exercise of custodial responsibility appropriate to the parents» resources and circumstances and the developmental level of the child.

The custodial arrangement for the child or children is the determination of which parent the child or children will primarily live with.

Father cross-appealed the provision of the order that provided the custodial arrangement would resume if she moved back to South Carolina after moving to Florida.

The custodial arrangement ends when the minor reaches the age of 18 or 21, depending on the state.

However, where the parents have a shared custodial arrangement, the trial court was required to make a full redetermination of what custody order was in the best interests of the children.

While in most cases Arizona families are able to work around the parameters of the custodial plans they are bound to follow, in some situations following a child custody arrangement can be downright frustrating.

Parents who foster cooperative shared custodial arrangements after a divorce can minimize some of the anxiety and adjustment that comes with divorce, explains psychologist Lesley Foulkes - Jamison, a former therapist of Clinical Psychology Associates of North Central Florida who now works in private practice in South Carolina.

According to research, about half of all children in joint physical custody see both parents at least weekly, compared to one in 10 children in traditional custody arrangements (custodial mother, noncustodial father).

The rights of a custodial parent can vary by jurisdiction as well as the terms set forth in a parenting plan established in a divorce settlement or legal custody arrangement.

This article will examine recent decisions concerning the relocation of the custodial parent in sole or primary physical custody arrangements as well as the proposed relocation of a parent in cases involving a joint custodial arrangement, including both joint legal custody and joint physical custody.

When the parents can not agree and end up litigating, the judge determines the custodial arrangement and it becomes part of the custody order.

For every rare couple (usually unremarried) who professes satisfaction with a shared custodial arrangement, many more honestly will admit that «Yeah, we tried that for X number of years while we still lived in the same town, and it was a nightmare... now we get along pretty good.»

Even if the custodial parent is otherwise «fit,» such bad faith conduct may be relevant to a determination of what permanent custody arrangement is in the minor children's best interest.

The court will only modify a custody order upon a demonstration of a material change of circumstances, which means that the existing custodial arrangement is no longer in the best interests of the child, such as when a serious health problem prevents a parent from taking care of a child.

This kind of arrangement usually gives the primary custodial parent the right to make major decisions concerning the child and allows the child to have a stable home environment.

When parents do not agree about the custodial arrangement for their children, a Mississippi court will examine the best interests of the children in determining custody.

Typically, the non-custodial parent pays child support to the custodial parent in order to help with the financial responsibilities of raising the children, but there can be other family arrangements, such as child support paid to a non-spouse or a third party.

The court stated that this concern with the nature of the parties» custodial arrangement was not dependent on the terms used by the parties to describe their arrangement as the terms of their agreement and the divorce judgment indicated that the parties only had joint legal custody.

Provided they focus on the best interests of the child, parents can modify custodial arrangement between themselves.

For this reason the concept of joint custody developed in the 1970s and 1980s as an alternative to the traditional single parent custodial arrangement.

In order to determine if such a shared custody arrangement existed, the court stated that the critical factor in making such a determination is the division of time regarding «each party's responsibility for the custodial functions, responsibilities and duties» normally performed by the child's primary caretaker.

For other cases holding that proposed relocation requests which would result in the effective termination of a shared physical custodial arrangement should be treated as a modification of custody, see, e.g., Lewellyn v. Lewellyn, 351 Ark. 346, 93 S.W. 3d 681 (2002)(both mother and father petitioned for sole custody of children after mother's proposed relocation would make parties» shared physical custodial arrangement unworkable; court found that mother's relocation constituted material change of circumstances warranting award of sole custody to father, even though such a relocation would not be considered a material change in circumstances in a case that did not involve shared physical custody), and In re Marriage of Garst, 955 P. 2d 1056 (Colo..

It is well documented through years of scientific research that actual custodial arrangements are secondary to other issues.

The custodial parent has an obligation to provide disclosure: Similar obligations to disclose financial information prior to commencement of court action are placed upon recipients of child support where a child support order has provided for special or extraordinary expenses, where undue hardship was invoked, where unusual debt loads were considered, where special custodial arrangements were in place, or where incomes are over $ 150,000.00.

With the failure to take into account the individual needs of the family, the above arrangement, very often, placed a huge burden for the custodial parent who would have to the day to day parenting responsibility, while at the same time the non-custodial parent became the fun parent whose time with the children was weekend play.

While the amount of child support paid depends in part on the custody and visitation arrangement, the two issues are separate and the custodial parent can not withhold visitation if the noncustodial parent refuses to pay child support or falls behind.

The terms custodial parent and primary physical custody usually describe the same type of custody arrangement.

Although a guardianship includes many of the same legal rights as the rights held by a custodial parent, guardianship and custody are distinctly different arrangements.

Terminology: In order to reaffirm our commitment of raising our child (ren) in a dual - household status, we choose to use the terms «live with mother» and «live with father» in describing our arrangement, rather than in terms of custody / primary and non - custodial / access as may be defined in other legal documents.

Document agreed - upon changes to the custodial arrangements, providing objective evidence and an audit trail in the event of future disputes.

In the absence of abuse, equal parenting will be the default custodial arrangement.

If a non-custodial parent sets up an informal arrangement with the custodial parent, the non-custodial parent should retain proof... MORE of all payments made such as check stubs or receipts for purchased items.

In this proceeding, a court will either alter the child custody arrangement, in favor of the non-custodial parent or a court may leave the current custodial agreement intact.

, a series of peer - reviewed articles have pointed to success in changing custodial or residential arrangements in favour of the targeted parent.

These factors include how dependant the child's sense of stability is upon the current custodial / time sharing arrangement, how far away the relocation destination is from the non-custodial parent, the age of the child or children, the relationship between the child and both parents, the relationship between the parents and whether they are capable of facilitating a continued relationship between the child and the non-custodial parent from a distance, the child's wishes if she is appropriately mature, and the reason for the relocation.

In other words, when a court issues a custody order, it typically will not order a change to the arrangement unless there's been a significant change of circumstances — a change so significant that the best interests of a child are no longer served by the existing custodial arrangement.

These factors are: (1) the potential advantages of the proposed move and likelihood the relocation will substantially improve the life of the custodial parent and child as well as whether the move is the result of a momentary whim by the custodial parent; (2) the integrity of both parents» motives - for the move and opposing the move; and (3) whether there are alternative custody or visitation arrangements that can be made that will foster an ongoing relationship between the child and noncustodial parent.