Indeed, they were plans that envisaged the Chancellor... standing here in 2014 presenting a spending review that still had years
of cutting public spending ahead of it.»
All three main parties are committed to an agenda
of cutting public spending and reject the case for increasing public investment.
«envisaged the Chancellor of the Exchequer standing here in 2014 and presenting a spending review that still had years
of cutting public spending ahead of it.»
Not exact matches
As would other key players, including former TD Bank chief economist Don Drummond (author
of a detailed report outlining cost -
cutting opportunities in Ontario) and former parliamentary budget officer Kevin Page, who has
spent decades uncovering wasteful
spending in the
public service.
The Bank
of Canada said nothing in
public about the possible merits
of deficit
spending as it twice
cut its benchmark interest rate last year to offset the collapse
of oil prices.
To try and secure the deal, the government announced an austerity plan to raise taxes and slash US$ 20 billion in
public spending — including
cuts to social welfare and
public jobs, and a lowering
of the minimum wage.
Publicly traded oil companies have lost billions in market value, and both
public and private firms are moving aggressively to
cut capital
spending budgets for 2015 — laying off thousands
of workers and shutting down hundreds
of rigs.
Attempts by Monti's government to
cut spending caused widespread
public anger, boosting the support
of populist parties in the election.
As talk about the economy has largely focused on tax
cuts, the U.S. budget deficit and the potential for trade tariffs, one
of the biggest things investors and the general
public seem to be missing is the increased
spending soon to be pumped into the U.S. economy by the government.
Under the Canada Economic Action Plan the deficit will be eliminated by 2015 - 16; although total net
public debt will have increased by $ 150 billion, the debt ratio will have declined to 33.0 per cent in 2015 - 16 and reach the government's target
of 25 percent by 2019 - 20; program
spending will fall to below 13 percent
of GDP and will continue to fall thereafter;
public sector jobs have been eliminated; and income and corporate taxes have been
cut.
The deal will boost Aramco's downstream business ahead
of a planned initial
public offering next year and also bolsters Malaysia's state - controlled Petroliam Nasional Bhd - known as Petronas - after it
cut spending because
of the slump in oil prices.
As Europe's banking crisis deepens, Greece's and Spain's fiscal crisis spreads throughout Europe and the US economy stalls, most discussions
of how to stabilize national finances assume that only two options are available: «internal devaluation» — shrinking the economy by
cutting public spending; or outright devaluation
of the currency (for countries that have not yet joined the euro, such as Eastern Europe).
It also must commit to
cutting back pensions and
public spending by enough to step up its NATO
spending to finance the bombing and destabilization
of Syria and the Near East, and over and above this, to accept the cost
of supporting all the refugees caused by US policy and its foreign legion in the form
of ISIS, Al quaeda and Al Nusra.
In recognizing the catalysts behind the
public's persistence to save and reluctance to
spend, additional analysis by policymakers should focus on the efficacy
of further rate
cuts on
spending and investment, as well as potential «roundabout» benefits
of a more normal rates regime to affirm support toward the
public's saving objectives, with the end goal
of boosting
public's risk sentiment and perceptions
of future economic stability.
J.P. Morgan agrees, saying that together with the RRR
cuts, «the seeming start
of a new cycle
of public spending and consumer stimulus should help to boost loan demand in the economy.»
Cutting government services — either temporarily in a shutdown, or permanently through
spending reductions — can disrupt a broad range
of commerce and hit American workers and businesses tied to the
public sector.
By focusing the attention
of faculty members now accustomed to routine
spending increases,
cuts in funding may have the unintended effect
of improving the situation
of teaching and learning about which a concerned
public is justifiably upset.
This particular blowhardism is a combination
of positions on entitlement
spending, taxation, military engagement, and purely rhetorical
spending cutting radicalism that can't withstand contact with the realities
of either the federal budget or
public opinion.
Results have not gone United's way recently and Mourinho has
cut a frustrated figure with
public criticisms
of not
spending enough on transfers among his complaints.
A modelling exercise for the Resolution Foundation by the Institute for Employment Research and the Institute for Fiscal Studies finds that on the basis
of annual average UK growth
of 2.5 per cent from 2015 - 2020 — an optimistic scenario — and no further
cuts in
public spending, living standards will fall for low and middle income households by between 3 and 15 per cent (Brewer et al., 2012).
It's possible that the
cuts will have taken such a toll on
public services by then that we'll be hollering for more
spending, but I see no sign
of it just yet.
Ninety four per cent
of public spending cuts are yet to hit the UK, and the
public sector is due to come under more pressure in the next few years.
Your doctrine
of so - called «expansionary fiscal contraction» — that the faster you
cut public spending, the greater the boost to private investment and growth — has been exposed as intellectually bankrupt.
The coalition government is conscious
of the fact that such an unpopular tax rise would be highly damaging to
public support in an environment where
public spending is being drastically
cut back.
Of course, it is true that population growth of any kind puts pressure on infrastructure, but in reality falling investment in public services represents a political choice by the current Conservative government, which has opted to spend the tax revenues generated by immigrants and refugees on tax cuts for businesses and reducing the deficit rather than expanding healthcare and education provisio
Of course, it is true that population growth
of any kind puts pressure on infrastructure, but in reality falling investment in public services represents a political choice by the current Conservative government, which has opted to spend the tax revenues generated by immigrants and refugees on tax cuts for businesses and reducing the deficit rather than expanding healthcare and education provisio
of any kind puts pressure on infrastructure, but in reality falling investment in
public services represents a political choice by the current Conservative government, which has opted to
spend the tax revenues generated by immigrants and refugees on tax
cuts for businesses and reducing the deficit rather than expanding healthcare and education provision.
But abolishing the CTF was part
of the Lib Dem manifesto in 2005 - and at the time the money was going to go to
cutting primary school class sizes, not reducing
public spending.
As I have written here before many Conservative MPs and most
of the media support
public spending cuts in theory and then oppose the precise
cuts that follow.
Where the big society is seen by many as a cover for
spending cuts, some
of the provisions
of the Localism Bill aim to make local authorities more accountable for the way
public money is
spent.
The future strategic tanker aircraft has seen a # 336 million increase in cost because
of fuel price inflation, but a failure to take advantage
of opportunities to
cut the overall bill on the Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier was criticised by the
public spending watchdog.
The communities secretary has suggested that although cutbacks are serious, local authorities will still be able to provide a «reasonable level
of services», by
cutting wasteful
spending and allowing them to come up with more innovative ways
of providing
public services.
«
Public sector
spending cuts are now beginning to bite and with the exception
of a steady recovery in the private housing market, where starts are forecast to increase by 5 % this year and 11 % next, the private sector is pretty subdued.
In those more recent fiscal squeezes, year - to - year
cuts in
public spending have been notably less deep than those imposed after both world wars or the «Geddes Axe»
cuts initiated by the Conservative - Liberal coalition
of the early 1920s.
This is despite the catch - all language
of «
cuts» used by political opponents, as well as by governments themselves when it suited to portray themselves as bearing down hard on
public spending.
Both Clegg and Alexander will today outline detailed plans for # 16 billion
of cuts to
public spending and # 8 billion
of tax increases if they form part
of the next government.
I've just written a piece for Comment is free arguing that in, at least, four areas
of public spending the Government has not
cut out the fat:
Changes could be on the way for the traveling
public both in the air and on the ground if the $ 85 billion worth
of spending cuts take effect as planned.
In the first
of these Budgets the main method was
cuts in
public spending.
Take the issue
of public spending cuts to reduce the Budget deficit.
To the extent that conservatives succeed in reducing fiscal woes to a case
of runaway
spending, politicians find it easier to address budget shortfalls with
public sector furlough days, wage freezes, layoffs and benefit
cuts than with progressive tax increases that, many economists conclude, would cause the least harm to the recovery.
Just the latest example was the pre-Budget briefing
of the # 15bn
cuts in
public spending to the Times and the Sun, which then gleefully declared that «thousands
of state jobs will go».
cut international development
spending and Labour activists go completely ballistic
cut ID cards and get attacked as soft on terror, having wasted billions and being weak
cut public sector jobs and have a winter
of discontent pull out
of Afghanistan and really annoy the Americans
«I think we should also have been looking far more at progressive taxation rather than the kinds
of cuts we're talking about here to
public spending.
Critics
of the idea have claimed it is a cover for the coalition's
spending cuts agenda, by transferring responsibility from the state to unprepared members
of the
public.
Therefore Conservative efforts to
cut public spending would have the effect
of reducing tax revenue, without any change to tax rates.
A prolonged period
of austerity would be disastrous for many women, having already borne the brunt
of the recession and the
public spending cuts that followed.
It does sadden me that, excited as he is, under a Conservative government there will be extensive
cuts to
public spending of the Arts.
The
public are remarkably accepting
of the need for
spending cuts.
George Osborne has defended himself against criticism
of his
spending cuts by insisting he will be just as affected as a normal member
of the
public.
Speaking on the Today programme after the letter emerged, Osborne defended his warning
of spending cuts and tax rises, saying Brexit would bring with it «chaos» in the UK's
public finances.
He also partially distanced himself from the policy
of Alistair Darling, the previous Labour Chancellor, to make
public spending cuts sufficient to halve the government deficit in four years, by calling it a starting point.