For a current list
of cyber charter schools and to visit the PA Department of Education website, please click here.
Despite the hope that many parents hold out for this new educational option, the performance
of cyber charter schools has consistently, and often drastically, lagged behind the performance of their brick - and - mortar school counterparts.
The best estimate comes from an internal report of one of the largest national providers
of cyber charter schools: The report found that a small percent — 13.6 percent of cyber school students in those schools — were previously homeschooled.
Our research, along with a body of academic work, suggests that the public should be concerned about an expansion
of the cyber charter schooling model.
This research is consistent with others that examine the academic outcomes
of cyber charter schools.
A much - discussed series that made the list is EdWeek's investigation
of cyber charter schools, called Rewarding Failure.
21CCCS holds the highest score
of any cyber charter on the College Ready Benchmark, which includes the SAT and ACT scores of 12th - grade students.
«Why are our legislators rushing to jump off the cliff
of cyber charter schools when the best available evidence produced by independent analysts show that such schools will be unsuccessful?»
Public school districts, which lose their per - pupil funding each time a student enrolls in one
of the cyber charters, are creating their own programs to compete.
The state already tracks the performance
of cyber charters as part of the annual School Performance Profile report it issues on all public schools.
Not exact matches
The number
of students attending a
cyber charter has steadily increased over the past five years, and this indicated that we needed to do a better job.
Using new powers granted under a trailblazing state law that took effect last July, the Pennsylvania Department
of Education has rejected all five
of its first batch
of applications for new «
cyber»
charter schools.
These «
cyber»
charters must now document their instructional minutes, and their per - pupil funding may be reduced if they offer less than the minimum number
of student course minutes per year — a district - style regulation
of the process
of education without regard for outcomes.
Pennsylvania Auditor General Jack Wagner called last week for a moratorium on new
charter and
cyber charter schools, pending an overhaul
of a funding system that he said has resulted in serious inequities in how taxpayers finance those alternatives to regular public schools.
In addition to school vouchers, REACH advocates and educates the public on the benefits
of tuition tax credits,
charter schools (including
cyber charter schools) and home schooling.
«Reducing the funding formula by 10 percent, for example, would result in
cyber charters having to cut from 10 percent to 20 percent
of their teachers and staff to make up the difference.
Boehm extolls the
charter school system: «Pennsylvania boasts a robust
charter school system that includes
cyber charter schools; the Education Improvement Tax Credit, or EITC, which provides an average scholarship
of $ 1,000 to low - income families who want their children to attend private schools; and rules that allow parents to teach their students at home.»
If you look at just about every independent analysis
of the performance
of students in the full - time
cyber charter schools compared to their traditional brick - and - mortar counterparts, they do quite poorly.
A lot
of cyber schools has state
charters that offer free public education to kids.
When Pennsylvania recalculated
charter schools» AYP using the same formula as traditional public schools, a much lower percentage
of charter schools (both bricks - and - mortar
charters and
cyber charters) reached AYP than traditional public schools.
The Electronic Classroom
of Tomorrow (ECOT), a for - profit
cyber charter, is supposed to pay back $ 60 million to the state
of Ohio because the school was unable to verify the attendance
of 40 percent
of its students.
Thus, high - enrollment
cyber charter schools are inherently void
of some
of the interaction needed to enhance learning for young children.
Again using Pennsylvania as an example, the funding formula for
charter schools in the Commonwealth dictates that a local district has to pay the per - pupil cost for each one
of its students that attends a
cyber charter school.
The argument is especially relevant in the discussions surrounding local versus national control
of schooling, specifically in the growing practice
of replacing local schools with
cyber charter schools.
ECOT (the Electronic Classroom
of Tomorrow) is a for - profit,
cyber charter school, that is underperforming on state report cards and costing taxpayers millions
of dollars.
For example, an eight - year - old student in a
cyber charter program may get the knowledge
of a math concept from afar, but he or she won't get a hug, high - five, or pat on the back from the school's headquarters.
In having a platform not capable
of delivering in - person interaction,
cyber charter schools miss many
of the nuances often overlooked in a well - rounded public education.
A final element that should cause concern about
cyber charter schools is that not only do massive
cyber schools fail to provide effective services found in quality local public schools, but they also cripple efforts
of local public schools to improve.
A 2011 study
of Pennsylvania
cyber schools found that students in online
charter schools performed worse in most measures than their counterparts who spent their days in traditional classrooms.
A specific example
of shortcomings
of a high - enrollment
cyber charter school is shown through many
of the failed schools affiliated with national
cyber charter company K12 Inc..
The lack
of organic services becomes especially alarming as reports begin to show that
cyber charter schools have failed academically, such as in Pennsylvania where not a single
cyber charter school met Annual Yearly Progress standards in 2011 — 2012.
Five
of those six high schools are in Philadelphia, and if you exclude a statewide
cyber charter school, they are the five worst schools in the entire state.
Whether it's
charter schools,
cyber schools or scholarship programs, empowering parents to choose the education that is best for their child is an effective use
of taxpayer dollars.
That total includes 132,860
charter school students, 26 percent
of whom attend
cyber charters.
A number
of alternative school models, including
cyber charters, are beginning to gain traction as a result
of the interest in and availability
of online coursework.
Joseph Roy, superintendent
of Bethlehem Area School District, questions the need for
cyber charter schools.
Brian Hayden, CEO
of Pennsylvania
Cyber Charter School, the state's largest cyber charter school with about 9,170 students, said he finds the proposal conc
Charter School, the state's largest
cyber charter school with about 9,170 students, said he finds the proposal conc
charter school with about 9,170 students, said he finds the proposal concerning.
In 2015 - 16, the latest year available,
cyber charter students in the majority
of the 14
cyber charters fared worse on state math and reading tests than the statewide average
of all public school students.
«Based on the preponderance
of evidence, as well as the fraud and mismanagement associated with
cyber charter schools, we strongly recommend that parents not enroll their children in virtual schools,» the report stated.
The 11
cyber charter schools in Pennsylvania through 2012 have been popular among families seeking alternatives to the traditional public schools, but their quality has been called into question because most
of their students have been unable to reach state benchmarks on math and reading tests.
Among the bundle
of Republican education bills snaking its way through Lansing is a pair
of measures that, at first glance, appears to capitalize on national bipartisan trends in education reform: two bills that would dramatically expand both
charter schools and
cyber schools in Michigan.
Depending on what happens in Lansing,
cyber schools, whose quality is just as mixed as that
of charter schools, could also explode throughout Michigan.
Following such reports
of poor academic outcomes and questionable ethical practices, our research team at Penn State has decided to continue to study the
cyber charter school movement in Pennsylvania to find out more.
Three powerful innovations — home schooling,
charter schools, and, most recently, virtual or
cyber schools — have each had an impact on our society's contempo - rary ways
of educating its young.
In our study
of enrollments in Pennsylvania, we found that the majority
of students in
cyber charter schools are indeed white, but they match the racial demographics
of the state.
What Betsy DeVos, an advocate
of school - choice initiatives and President - elect Donald Trump's nominee for education secretary, as well as the rest
of us need to know about
cyber charter schools.
In the
cyber version
of the
charter school, instruction is typically delivered to the students online wherever they may live, so long as they are residents
of the state in which the
cyber charter school operates.
What is
of further concern as one legal scholar, Susan DeJarnatt, has shown is that
cyber charter schools may not have all the safeguards needed to protect the sector from fraud.
He worked to benefit
cyber charters and K12 specifically when he was Governor
of Florida, and in the ensuing years his Foundation for Excellence in Education has been working with ALEC to make it easier for
cyber charters, including K12 Inc., to expand nationally.
Worth noting: Before the Senate Education Committee passed HB 97, they amended the bill to make it even more favorable to the
charter industry by stripping out $ 27 million in savings that school districts would have received this year and next year as a result
of changes in
cyber charter school tuition payments.