Robust appraisals of climate impacts at different levels of global - mean temperature increase are vital to guide assessments
of dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
Not exact matches
The objective
of the treaty is to «stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.»
But Trump's announcement sends a strong message that the US would rather be one
of only two nations in the world that is not interested in preventing «
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system».
This simple analysis shows that the «2 degree target»
of «
dangerous anthropogenic interference» is looming on the horizon, as the climate equilibrates and aerosol pollution is cleaned up.
We are therefore committed to -LSB-...] stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system -LSB-...] we will consider seriously the decisions made by the European Union, Canada and Japan which include at least a halving
of global emissions by 2050.
«stabilization
of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system»
The most encouraging thing for me to come from this paper is not the variance in percieved GHG and related forcing levels that may or may not constitute
Dangerous Anthropogenic Interference, but the acknowledgement
of the rate
of change in emissions due to fuel price increases and the exponential growth
of public awareness.
(3) From the supporting perspective article: «All this would be very bad news if avoiding
dangerous anthropogenic interference in the climate system required us to specify today a stabilization concentration
of carbon dioxide (or equivalent) for which the risk
of dangerous warming is acceptably low.
The UNFCCC, through its Conference
of Parties, tries to negotiate, and make legally binding, pathways towards lower emissions
of greenhouse gases, to avoid «
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.»
The 1992 U.N. treaty [Framework Convention on Climate Change] called for «stabilization
of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.»
It has as an «ultimate objective» the stabilising
of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere «at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic (human - induced)
interference with the climate system.»
Given the increased levels
of certainty regarding human - induced global warming (from 90 to 95 %), more robust projections on sea - level rise and data on melting
of ice sheets, and the «carbon budget» for staying below the 2 °C target, the WGI conclusions together with other AR5 component reports are likely to put more pressure on the UNFCCC parties to deliver by 2015 an ambitious agreement that is capable
of preventing
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
Article 2
of the FCCC states that its ultimate objective is to «achieve stabilization
of greenhouse gas concentration in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic [man - made]
interference with the climate system.»
«The ultimate objective
of this Convention... is to achieve,... stabilization
of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.»
Reports such as those
of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) demonstrate that science is far too immature to know what, if any, GHG concentrations would cause «
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.»
The treaty's principal objective was «stabilization
of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic [i.e., man - made]
interference with the climate system.»
``... to achieve... stabilization
of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.»
Judith: I happen to agree that Article II
of the UNFCCC (stabilization to avoid
dangerous anthropogenic interference) may not have been the most helpful way to phrase the problem.
As the negotiations grow ever more technical and complex, it is good to keep in mind that the ultimate goal
of the convetion is to stabilize the green house gases in the atmosphere to a level that prevents
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
Stabilization
of climate to avoid «
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system», as called for in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, will require significant cutbacks in greenhouse gas emissions during the 21st century; and
This is a central but not exhaustive component
of potentially
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
Hence, avoiding
dangerous levels
of CO2 - induced warming is a necessary, albeit not always sufficient, condition for avoiding potentially
dangerous anthropogenic interference in the climate system.
The criterion, in the words
of Article 2, is «
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system» — a framing that invokes both scientific analysis and human values.
[i] Many believe that a rise
of 2 — 2.5 oC will cause a «
dangerous anthropogenic interference with climate.»
«I am one
of those who believes that ANY REASONABLY COMPREHENSIVE AND UP - TO - DATE LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE MAKES CLEAR THAT CIVILIZATION HAS ALREADY GENERATED
DANGEROUS ANTHROPOGENIC INTERFERENCE IN THE CLIMATE SYSTEM.
The UN protocol requires every nation on earth to reduce their atmospheric emissions
of greenhouse gas to 94.8 %
of 1990 levels to «prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.»
Article 2 The ultimate objective
of this Convention and any related legal instruments that the Conference
of the Parties may adopt is to achieve, in accordance with the relevant provisions
of the Convention, stabilization
of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
Such documents could demonstrate companies» knowledge, for instance, that the use
of their products damages human health and well - being by contributing to «
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.»
As defined by the OECD, mitigation aid «contributes to the objective
of stabilization
of greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system by promoting efforts to reduce or limit GHG emissions or to enhance GHG sequestration.»
The identification
of potential key vulnerabilities is intended to provide guidance to decision - makers for identifying levels and rates
of climate change that may be associated with «
dangerous anthropogenic interference» (DAI) with the climate system, in the terminology
of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Article 2 (see Box 19.1).
A recent international modelling comparison exercise (Edenhofer et al., 2006) has shown that ITC not only has the potential to reduce mitigation costs substantially but that it is also essential to the stabilization
of concentration levels
of CO2, avoiding
dangerous anthropogenic interference.
Both
of these effects, along with changes in natural variables must be examined explicitly by efforts to understand climate change and devise policy that complies with the objective
of Article 2
of the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to stabilize «greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference in the climate system.»
Specifying «increasing sink capacity», or increasing the capacity to remove GHGs (that is, greenhouse gas removal, or «GHGR») as a separate category allows us to distinguish two separate stages in the process
of avoiding
dangerous anthropogenic interference that are usually bundled together under the term «mitigation».
As a result, nations have failed to adopt climate change policies consistent with their equitable obligations despite the fact that all nations who are parties to the UNFCCC agreed, when they became parties, to reduce their emissions to levels required
of them based upon «equity» to prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
The 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change states as an objective the ``... stabilization
of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.»
Concerned about appropriate temperature targets to avoid the impending climate Apocalypse; well, we'll just post an article by Knopf stating «many
of these issues can not be answered solely by science, such as the question
of a temperature level that avoids
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system».
To achieve the ultimate objective
of the Convention to stabilize greenhouse gas concentration in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system, we shall, recognizing the scientific view that the increase in global temperature below 2 degrees, on the basis
of equity and in the context
of sustainable development, enhance our long - term cooperative action to combat climate change.
I picked just one
of these papers at (sort
of) random: Defining
dangerous anthropogenic interference written by Michael E. Mann, PNAS March 09.
Here is a key point made by R&F (I removed the reference numbers for clarify
of reading here — see the original paper for the links to the relevant peer - reviewed literature; GHG = greenhouse gases, CEWGA = committed equilibrium warming from greenhouse gases and aerosols, Wm2 = watts per metre squared, DAI =
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system):
The objective
of Article 2
of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (United Nations, 1992) is to achieve stabilisation
of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
The ultimate objective
of the UNFCCC is to «stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.»
The range
of 1.4 °C to 4.3 °C in the committed warming overlaps and surpasses the currently perceived threshold range
of 1 °C to 3 °C for
dangerous anthropogenic interference with many
of the climate - tipping elements such as the summer arctic sea ice, Himalayan - Tibetan glaciers, and the Greenland Ice Sheet.