When enough of these carbonate deposits build up, they form carbonate rocks, such as limestone, which are composed of the skeletons of trillions
of dead plankton.
Now the flood is supposed to have happened about 4361 years ago (2013)[1] so that means that if we go down that number of layers we should find on or about that layer evidence of the flood in the form
of dead plankton, salt, and other ocean detritus.
Not exact matches
The
plankton that feed on the dust's minerals can bloom significantly, providing food for other ocean creatures, but an overgrown bloom can consume much
of the dissolved oxygen in an area and create an anoxic
dead zone.
That muck, researcher Henry Ruhl says, is actually food — a nourishing blend
of feces and
dead plankton that fall from surface waters.
At the same time, this
dead plankton can become a source
of carbon that is not otherwise readily available to other sea life.
a) Satellite image showing fast disintegration
of sea ice over a polar continental shelf; b) Zoobenthos on an Antarctic continental shelf; c) Examples
of sea mosses (specimens on the left are from an open - water location and hence have had more
plankton to feed on); and d)
Dead bryozoan and other benthic skeletons covering the seabed, most likely to be buried, sequestering their blue carbon in the seabed.
CaCO3 tends to dissolve in the deep ocean, both because
of the high pressure and because the waters have been acidified by CO2 from rotting
dead plankton.
It is now well accepted and verified that many biological organisms (e.g., trees, corals,
plankton, animals) alter their growth and / or population dynamics in response to changing climate, and that these climate - induced changes are well recorded in past growth in living and
dead (fossil) specimens or assemblages
of organisms.
Of far greater concern than corals in particular is the ocean food chain in general, because while acidification will probably result in more oceanic dead zones as the amount of CO2 goes up and the amount of oxygen falls, if you kill off the plankton and pteropods that use carbonate to make their shells, then you kill off the food supply for the vast majority of higher organisms (like mollusks, fish, and even marine mammals
Of far greater concern than corals in particular is the ocean food chain in general, because while acidification will probably result in more oceanic
dead zones as the amount
of CO2 goes up and the amount of oxygen falls, if you kill off the plankton and pteropods that use carbonate to make their shells, then you kill off the food supply for the vast majority of higher organisms (like mollusks, fish, and even marine mammals
of CO2 goes up and the amount
of oxygen falls, if you kill off the plankton and pteropods that use carbonate to make their shells, then you kill off the food supply for the vast majority of higher organisms (like mollusks, fish, and even marine mammals
of oxygen falls, if you kill off the
plankton and pteropods that use carbonate to make their shells, then you kill off the food supply for the vast majority
of higher organisms (like mollusks, fish, and even marine mammals
of higher organisms (like mollusks, fish, and even marine mammals).
Hundreds
of meters below the sea floor, bacteria produce methane from the
dead plankton.
But some algae and
plankton blooms can turn dangerous, either through the production
of chemical toxins or by severely depleting the oxygen supply in the ocean and creating «
dead zones» that suffocate marine creatures.