Five years after wildlife biologist Charles Monnett's 2006 observations
of dead polar bears, believed to have drowned because of disappearing Arctic ice, Interior started an investigation of Monnett's science.
A couple
of dead polar bears?
While over at the Bishop's they're talking about another photo
of a dead polar bear.
Not exact matches
We already have a number
of dead zones and fish dependent animals dying off at an alarming rate (whales, sharks,
polar bears to name a few).
John Kuhns dad was a
polar bear and his mom was the corpse
of a
dead seal which makes sense because when it get's cold out side he likes to show off his
bear arms.
In 2004, during an aerial survey
of bowhead whales in the Beaufort Sea north
of Alaska, Monnett and his colleague Jeffrey Gleason observed four
dead polar bears.
Global warming, floods, plagues
of locusts, melting ice caps,
dead polar bears, millions
of climate change refugees.
The «consensus» warm - mongers could have declared it only counts as «peer - reviewed» if it's published in Peer - Reviewed Studies published by Mann & Jones Publishing Inc (Peermate
of the Month: Al Gore, reclining naked, draped in
dead polar -
bear fur, on a melting ice floe), and Ed Begley Jr. and «Andy» Revkin would still have wandered out glassy - eyed into the streets droning «Peer - reviewed studies.
In 2006, Jeffrey Gleason and Charles Monnett, two government scientists working out
of Alaska, published a report that described
dead polar bears floating in the Arctic Ocean.
Mind you, it appears that the chap now admits that his report
of four
dead polar bears was wrong — there were but three.
But then so was the hockey stick, the defenses
of Hansen» 88, the
dead polar bears, the disappearing rain forest, the disappearing glaciers.
Oh, and they also listed
dead scientists as points
of contact and included walrus and
polar bears as animals that could be impacted by a spill (clearly they just cut and pasted from an Alaska plan and no one at MMS read it).