Sentences with phrase «of debate on»

The essence of the debate on whether wholesaling is illegal revolves around the term «brokering.»

There has been a lot of debate on BP about this topic, so just do a search for more information.

There is a lot of debate on two points — operating expenses and lease options.

The issue also offers an array of helpful answers to frequently asked questions answered by local divorce lawyers and other divorce professionals, a financial health check - up quiz, and an overview of the debate on whether 50/50 joint custody by parents should be the starting point in any divorce settlement.

Without doubt the most controversial aspect of the debate on reconciliation has been over the implications of the right to self - determination.

Most of the debate on Section 18C of the Act has been around the question of freedom of expression — «the right to be a bigot» as Attorney General George Brandis put it.

And now, time for eight hours of debate on this Stoneman Douglas bill before we see how this vote pans out.

After years of debate on the best path forward, a new code proposal called Segwit2x is set to put the cryptocurrency - the world's largest by value - to the test.

Ireland, 26 October The mandate of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and its Protocols is at the heart of our debate on how to control and regulate the use of conventional weapons.

Long a controversial figure at the center of the debate on how best to scale the public bitcoin blockchain, Garzik's company is today announcing what it believes will be a solution to the infighting he perceives as keeping money out of the established cryptocurrency market.

This vote will send the bill along to the next stage of approval, which consists of a debate on the House floor.

The caliber of debate on issues of importance to not only the legal profession but of importance to society is the finest that I've ever run across.

His position in considering the state of knowledge of such an intermediary at the forefront of any debate on publication and defamation was endorsed by the Court of Appeal in Tamiz v Google in 2012.

Bill C - 300, An Act respecting Corporate Accountability for the Activities of Mining, Oil or Gas in Developing Countries, goes into its Third Reading this Fall Session, and is scheduled for its first hour of debate on the very first day that MPs return to session, September 20, 2010.

There will be about eight more hours of debate on the Bill to allow newly elected members of the assembly to provide their opinions.

The Dano case goes right to the heart of the debate on social tourism.

In passing, regarding your allusion to ignorance or lack of knowledge as being a basis for dismissing arguments / opinions, i find this to be particularly problematic in the context of a debate on corporate personhood.

Overall, the book gives an excellent account of the debate on the legitimacy of government and governance of the Eurozone and ultimately the EU that took place in the aftermath of the Eurocrisis and contains interesting ideas on how more democratic legitimacy could be achieved, which is why it is definitively worth reading and discussing.

Charles Foster reflects on the disappointing nature of the debate on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill

See a description of the debate on Slaw.ca.

Exploring this added territory should, in my view, be part of the debate on allowing ABSs.

I'm wondering why there isn't more of a debate on Barristers and the Solicitors Examinations.

There has been a good amount of debate on Lawyerist and elsewhere about the law school bubble, and I think some of the arguments about its damage to our industry are well - founded.

There are many public intellectual debates occurring over scientific and skeptical issues — the place of creationism vs evolution in public science classes, the including of alternative medicine in academic curricula, the validity of debate on global warming, etc..

The policy options that have been put forward by both sides of the debate on AGW have little to commend them.

I really don't understand why realclimate is bothering to engage a few rabid denialists in any kind of debate on these issues.

But there is a lot of debate on the «mitigation» and «consequences» fronts, too.

It's now frightening how little climate science is known by both sides of the debate on human causation of global warming.

It's valuable to have contributions that raise the quality of the debate on CE,

The event, endorsed by the COP23 Presidency and presided by World Water Council Honorary President Loïc Fauchon and H.E. Charafat Afilal, Secretary of State for Water and Environment of Morocco, brought high level participants, such as international experts and political leaders at the forefront of the debate on climate change and water, as well as several environmental ministers, including, Istiaque Ahmad, Secretary of the Ministry of Environment and Forests of Bangladesh and Sindra Sharma - Khushal, from the UNFCCC COP23 Presidency Team for Fiji.

I think much of the debate on either side is actually being carried on between people who are doing this kind of mapping.

I will add that MM is no hero of mine (his shoddy work is the cause of much of the debate on CC), whereas the Apollo astronauts definitely are heros.

And he has spoken there; for example, here is my account of a debate on the motion `' «This House Believes Global Warming is a Global Crisis» where he and I (with Niils Axel Morner) were on the same side St Andrews Uni.

Much of the debate on reducing international carbon emissions has focused on the extra cost of making the necessary cuts to slow the onset of climate change.

Also just read an interesting article at MINDING THE CAMPUS on the lack of debate on Global Warming at University campuses.

It's very clear (thanks to Steve M, Willis etc) that there are issues with both but given the current hyped claim by the «warmers» that the past effects of man - caused global warming have largely been masked by the warming of the oceans and that unless we reduce CO2 emissions now that we won't be able to mitigate future global warming when this «stored heat» eventually comes back out of the oceans and leads to catastrophic effects, I'm very interested in getting to the punchline of this debate on SSTs.

Peter Lang has written at length on this subject and on the push toward the use of renewables instead of coal for the future generation of electricity in Western economies, which has often been the subject of debate on Judith's blog.

Lets just say that I sense that both sides of the debate on climate change have biased POV's on any evidence that is placed before them and that a lot more work needs to be done before anyone can claim that the science is settled.

Our hostess seemed to think she could have a forum where both sides of the debate on CAGW could discuss the issue on a scientific basis.

This may be true (there is still plenty of debate on that point) but since there are no good explanations of past natural variability, that merely points out our ignorance of all the factors influencing the climate system.

«Regardless of the debate on the science of climate change, the facts are that we still need to reduce pollution, increase renewable energy sources and shift to a clean energy future,» she said.

The content of debate on this is disappointing and I think mostly off - topic.

As you can see there is plenty of debate on the critical points underpinning the AGW hypothesis (assuming it is accepted as such at this point), so I don't see how you can state there is a general agreement about the science.

In the first three days of the debate on the bill, according to my rough calculation, about 246 million more tons of carbon dioxide flowed into the atmosphere from human activities worldwide.

[Response: There is a lot of debate on this issue, and definitive statements one way or the other are (at present) unsupportable.

I have served my time in the «trenches of the climate war» in the context of the debate on hurricanes and global warming.

Numerous additional aspects of the debate on climate change raise serious doubts in my mind.

The intrusion of civil society into the rarefied gallery world sparked a wave of debate on arterimalaysia.com, a Web site begun in February this year that's devoted entirely to Malaysian contemporary art.

With the appointment of the New York artist collective DIS, whose online magazine offers articles on climate change alongside faux - commercials, the Biennale has transformed itself into the locus of the debate on post-digital worlds.»

From «social to speculative; technical to theoretical,» the participating teams lead intellectual and architectural practices that not only situate the US as a leading center of critical research at the heart of the debate on citizenship, social conscience, and a just society, but also as a place at the intersection of political action, public policy, and changing notions of nationality.