Sentences with phrase «of diaby»

I agree get another holding midfielder with coq, plus we should get rid of diaby Flamini and Arteta.

, GET rid of diaby he, s a walking injury nightmare.

I would take him instead of Diaby playing Bergy role or Eboue / Denilson / Even Toure... playing wide midfield.

I am only afriad of Diaby unnecessarily holding to ball and dribbling.

What was said last year of Song they now say of Diaby.

We played them off the park last year in one of Diaby's greatest games.

We are where we are because of the mediocre signings of Diaby, Chamakh, Squillachi, Koscielny, Almunia, sprinkled with the Bentdners, Velas, Denilsons who should long ago been cast off, the proof is in the pudding now as NOBODY wants to sign these guys, and who can blame them, we will be lucky to give some of them away just to relieve the ridiculous wages we were paying them.

Without doubt, there is a lack of balance in the squad with the absence of defensive midfielders and a few paper swords in the form of Diaby, Rosicky & Squid, but far and large this squad is one that can «compete».

my advice is do nt have him in the squad for blackburn, if we are being realistic here we should not even need him a midfield trio of diaby, arteta and cazorla would be good enough we do nt want to burn him out especially with bayern coming up

The intro of Diaby and Nasri to tired West Ham legs was the difference - Diaby really does look unplayable when he is in this form - the incisiveness was lifted immediately and instantly we looked dangerous.

How Nolan went unpunished for his push of Diaby was baffling.

The one of Diaby is for me truly remarkable; had the shot been planned and posed I doubt very much you could better what we have here.

A good friend of mine, photographer Ryu Voelkel was at the game and captured fantastic image of Diaby during the game, which I have included below.

Nice photographs, the softfocus / outfocus of Diaby's background really give a sense of «moodiness» to the composition.

The absence of Diaby could explain a bit, the rather cautious approach from Song to avoid a yellow card (still had a good game) another bit.

The recovery of Diaby and return of Coquelin also provide options, but relying on Diaby to stay injury free seems unwise and Coquelin's ability seems far off following recent loan spells.

Both the sending off of Diaby and the injury to Djourou affected us badly, coupled with one of the worst refereeing performances I've ever seen in top of a wonder goal from Tiote (a player who just recently has resembled the new Nigel Quashie).

Example of Diaby comes to mind.

Is this a blip (e.g. effect of Diaby's long term care on the overall picture?)

Just look at the likes of Diaby, Wilshere, Walcott, Ramsey, Jenkinson, Sanago, etc..

Any idea why we're keeping hold of Diaby?

Why do we still keep the likes of diaby, monreal etc in the club?

He's referring to the departures of Diaby, Podolski and maybe Walcott.

We should keep one of arteta and flamini they are good players to have in the squad that always suffers injuries we should let go of diaby and podolski to create space in the midfield

If we make all these signs and keep our main stars letting the likes of Diaby, Arteta and Flamini go....

Adelaide reminds me of Diaby.

This is the equivalent of Diaby complaining.

If pundits are right and from the little I have seen he is a more powerful and more dominating type DM than coquellin... I think that is what wanyama adds to shampton and yaya toure to man city and matic to chelski... He would also certainly add aerial strength... U r right there are no guarantees including that coq will maintain last seasons level... But sell flamini and get rid of Diaby for sure and we have a serious upgrade on existing options... And lower wage bill... Seems like common sense to me

Domenech openly admitted to using astrology to select his teams, which is the only plausible explanation for the selection of Diaby.

Many will look to Arsene's sale of Podolski and release of Diaby and feel like he could at least bring in someone.

If there was absolutely no chance of Diaby ever playing again for Arsenal he wouldn't have bothered keeping him, wasting the physio's time, reintegrating him etc.

A goal from a penalty is the fault of diaby and the screamer scored by clyne is also diabys fault!

We need a DM regardless of Diaby's fitness.

I think the release of Diaby has freed up a space for Cech to occupy and Podolski should also soon free up another space for my favoured possible LB Ghoulam Faouzi from Napoli to pick up.

IMO he is the much better, little less injury prone version of Diaby.

We have very different memories of Diaby — He's definitely got the ability to be great but he's never produced it consistently and is not exactly a workhorse for the team.

@Galen You want to get rid of every one except the most injury prone player this side of Diaby... Jack wheelchair... Lmfao

I would sell him without hesitation but don't see that happening... I just hope that wenger doesn't use it as excuse not to strengthen attacking options... That's what he did last summer in DM position with his silly talk of Diaby being like a new signing... it cost us challenging for the title this year and history sadly might well repeat itself with predictable consequences

Apparently it's taking longer due to the fact that they are clearing out the medical room of all Diaby's possessions.

Arsenal have been linked with a whole host of midfield signings, and a deal seems all the more likely now as Wenger gives up on the likes of Diaby and Flamini.

I think the major reason Wenger did not sign a strong DM is because of Diaby, Wenger may think it s his last chance to prove what he is capable of and he is when fit so I expect to see a breaktrough or fail from Diaby.You have to admire the loyalty of Wenger on those kind of point, the team is still short of defender but I do think that a Diaby fit can be a good DM as he is tall, strong and technical.There is 3 new striker, Campbell and Sanchez who can play the wings and a tall, strong Wellbeck who can bully the defenders in the box, all three have pace so it s an upgrade on Giroud and Sanogo.

The point does remain though, IF Arsenal didn't have any injuries at all (including the likes of Diaby, TV5.etc... all immune to injuries) I am very confident Arsenal would have won more or competed better atleast.

On top of that Diaby and Gnabry live in the twighlight zone while Podolsk Sanogo Gnabry and Ryo are banished to never never land.

Getting rid of Diaby, Cambell, podolski, Sonogo, Schez (loan), flamini....

In the case of Diaby, he wasn't meant to be a professional footballer, not every human body can cope with the physicality of professional sports.

The likes of Diaby, and Rosicky, were here for years without playing, and it's been the same with Jack.

I am a bug fan of Diaby but I have to admit I have lost interest in whether he will be fit or not in the following weeks.

I agree with letting go of Flamini (has become poor) I agree with letting go of Diaby (always injured and good to free up wages)

Wenger's reintroduction of Diaby into the Arsenal setup was an understandably cautious one.

also i read talk of diaby getting a new contract!!