Sentences with phrase «of different attachment styles»

Research has shown many cross-cultural differences in proportional ratios of different attachment styles among children and adults (Sprecher et al., 1994).

Overall, the distributions of the different attachment styles in children living in institutions have been shown to have lower rates of secure and higher rates of disorganised attachment than those observed in children living with their biological parents in the general population (Bakermans - Kranenburg et al. 2011; Katsurada 2007; Muadi et al. 2012; Zeanah et al. 2005).

If you want to read in - depth about Ainsworth's «Strange Situation Experiment» and her discovery of the different attachment styles infants may display.

Researchers have also expanded upon Bowlby's original work and have suggested that a number of different attachment styles exist.

Attachment theory, for example, began with the work of John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth and has expanded and grown to include new descriptions of different attachment styles.

They have identified a number of different attachment styles to describe the affectional bond children have with their parents or caregivers.

Not exact matches

I recently read a book called Attached about the three different styles of attachment that people express in relationships.

More recent attachment theory is based on research into different styles of attachment in both children and adult romantic relationships.

On the flipside of secure attachment, there are three different styles which fall on the insecure attachment spectrum.

I wrote a book called Create New Love: How Men and Women can Prepare for a Lasting Relationship, and a main focus of several chapters was how helpful it can be to assess your attachment style, and that of your dates so that you don't try to make a relationship work with someone very different from you.

Author Andrew G. Marshall says that the two main culprits that destroy what he calls «Loving Attachment» are neglecting physical intimacy and not accepting each other's differences — such as different parenting styles or ways of resolving conflicts.

It is the response to these tendencies and the attachment style of the pair that defines different mother - daughter relationship styles.

A number of studies have found evidence that yes, insecure attachment styles are associated with physiological stress responses and lifestyle behaviors that put people at risk for health problems.2, 3,4 The idea is that attachment promotes different ways of perceiving and regulating stress.

In the 25th installment of SAGE's Relationship Matters podcast, hosted by Dr. Bjarne Holmes of Champlain College, Dr. Maryhope Howland (a former PhD student at the University of Minnesota; now at Kent State University) talks about her research on how people with different attachment styles use humor in relationships.

Once an internal working model establishes an attachment style, regardless of environmental variations (different relationships), we keep re-affirming our attachment style.

Bowlby described three different attachment styles based on the level of security in the attachment bond: Secure, anxious / ambivalent, and avoidant.

To account for potential confounders associated with diabetes self - care, we conducted a logistic regression to determine whether the percentage of patients with HbA1c levels ≥ 8 % were different between attachment style categories after adjusting for covariates that were specifically different between attachment groups, such as demographics, medical comorbidity, diabetes complications, diabetes knowledge, and depression.

Let's start with an example of how the different attachment styles might respond to this common scenario in dating.

Development of Attachment in Romantic Relationship of Young Adults with Different Love Styles

The final factor included in our model was attachment style which was measured on the anxious and avoidant dimensions, both of which were independent predictors of different love styles.

This study explored whether cultural orientation, gender, attachment style, and relationship could be combined to predict each of the different love styles, and the results revealed that they did.

Participants of this workshop will learn, discuss and experientially process through different attachment styles and how they directly impact the attachment process between the caregiver and child in the playroom.

Children's development of the cognitive and social skills needed for later success in school may be best supported by a parenting style known as responsive parenting.1 Responsiveness is an aspect of supportive parenting described across different theories and research frameworks (e.g. attachment, socio - cultural) as playing an important role in providing a strong foundation for children to develop optimally.2 - 4 Parenting that provides positive affection and high levels of warmth and is responsive in ways that are contingently linked to a young child's signals («contingent responsiveness») are the affective - emotional aspects of a responsive style.5 These aspects, in combination with behaviours that are cognitively responsive to the child's needs, including the provision of rich verbal input and maintaining and expanding on the child's interests, provide the range of support necessary for multiple aspects of a child's learning.6

Furthermore, an analysis of variance was computed to compare the attachment style within different groups.

Third, in the light of the strong connection between attachment styles and emotion regulation strategies, we are interested in linking the perception of different caregiving styles to a measure of emotion arousal.

Through the construction of self - report questionnaires, they found that the three different styles of attachment, as proposed by Ainsworth et al. [3], help explain personality differences in experiences of romantic relationships.

The link between adult attachment style and the perception of different ways of caregiving can contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the transmission of attachment.

In particular, we investigated if current adult attachment styles make individuals discriminate different ways of caregiving, and if they are associated with a preference for a specific caregiving modality.

Attachment style would be confirmed as crucial in the psychophysiological process of discerning between different caregiving behaviors and the prominence of low - level information processes in forming these attitudes.

In order to explore the association between attachment styles and the perception of different caregiving modalities, we designed a study to elicit a specific caregiving representation in the participants and, then, we assessed the attitude to the semantic category «mother.»

There will be differences between countries and between different types of institutions and foster care programs, regarding rates of attachment styles.

The four - category model of attachment predicts that a secure and insecure attachment style has a different relationship with the perception of both stress and social support in interpersonal relationships toward people.

Wired for Love illustrates different ways of relating (via attachment styles) and how our experience in romantic and intimate partnerships is directly influenced by our personal relationship styles, beliefs, and defensive strategies.

Numerous researchers have noted a range of attachment styles beyond the dichotomony of avoidant / attachment dimensions [40]; for example, a larger sample would have allowed more nuanced examination of participants with different permutations of attachment style (e.g. high anxious and high avoidant tendencies).

The above attachment styles could express the importance of emotions for Malaysian young adults in different social settings and various types of relationships.

Each study used a different scale to classify attachment style, although Donarelli et al. (2012) used an Italian language version of the Revised Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR - R) scale (Picardi et al., 2000), the English language version of which was used by Van den Broek et al. (2010).

All the studies reported results in terms of rates, percentage or number of children classified in the different Attachment Styles (as this was considered an inclusion criteria).

As Malaysian culture is part of Asian traditions, which in turn encompasses multiple subcultures, it is expected to demonstrate a few different and unique attachment styles due to the differences in child rearing, education, socialization and aspirations towards ideal models of social relationships.

The kind of attachment children develop to their parents has been related to different parenting styles, described by dimensions like autonomy support (Skinner et al., 2005), parental sensitivity (Belsky et al., 1991) and parental control (Barber and Harmon, 2002; Kuppens et al., 2013).