Sentences with phrase «of divine creator»

has led us to the conclusion, so far, that art is not a free, autonomous activity of a super-endowed individual, «influenced» by previous artists, and, more vaguely and superficially, by «social forces,» but rather, that the total situation of art making, both in terms of the development of the art maker and in the nature and quality of the work of art itself, occur in a social situation, are integral elements of this social structure, and are mediated and determined by specific and definable social institutions, be they art academies, systems of patronage, mythologies of the divine creator, artist as he - man or social outcast.

Anyway, Primordia is an old - school point and click adventure game that imagines such a scenario, wherein robots of various levels of technological sophistication exist in a post-human society where man takes the role of divine creator whose existence is disputed.

Tell you what, you provide a single shred of positive evidence of some divine creator, let alone a divine creator that follows the contradictory and judgemental christian doctrine, and we can talk.

All too naturally a religious Christianity has known the most awesome and terrifying form of the divine Creator and Judge, for a religious reversal of the Incarnation must resurrect the deity in the form of an absolutely majestic and sovereign power, a power that has now lost its ground in the kenotic movement of the divine process.

The world becomes a revelation of the divine wisdom, and Nature is a unity in the sense that it exhibits the wisdom of its divine Creator and Upholder.

Indeed, in the image of the divine Creator, we add to the natural hierarchy of unities through our intelligent engagement with our environment — not least by our creation of artefacts.

Not exact matches

I really get a good laugh from people like this who try to discredit the faith of those who CHOOSE to believe in God and in a divine creator.

That is your first mistake because you can not provide me with a reasonable explanation for a divine creators existence) and the fact that we exist is not anymore a reason for the proof of the existence of an anthropomorphic god than it proves the existence of, in Richard Dawkins terms, the flying spaghetti monste.

[16] It may seem as if we are now relying on divine Revelation, but in speaking of God as the creator of human persons, we remain within the purview of the natural law.

Rather, the two would come together in a cosmocentric, immanental model of transcendence: God the creator of the evolving, incredibly vast and complex universe understood as the divine «body.»

Wonder and awe before the majesty of the Creator, answering a high call to service, being transformed by a Power greater than our own, being aware of a Presence in whose fellowship we find our strength, being reinforced by the divine help so that we triumph over trouble, opening our lives to inspired hours when the best seems the most real — all these are responses to revelations of reality above and beyond ourselves, but nowhere is such revelation so compelling as when it comes incarnate in a person.

From this beginning came all that followed, so everything that is is related, woven into a seamless network, with life gradually emerging after billions of years on this planet (and perhaps on others) and resulting in the incredibly complex, intricate universe we see today.32 To think of God as the creator and continuing creator / sustainer of this massive, breathtaking cosmic fact dwarfs all our traditional images of divine transcendence — whether political or metaphysical.

In God, the Creator - Father, and in Christ, the revelation of the divine character, the first Christians fervently believed, but all this became inward and empowering only when the Spirit entered and possessed them.

Discussing at length three biological structures that ID supporters cite as evidence of «irreducible complexity» (and therefore the need, they say, for divine intervention), Collins shows how ID remains no more than a modern version of a «god of the gaps» hypothesis, which posits a «clumsy Creator, having to intervene at regular intervals to fix the inadequacies of His own initial plan for generating the complexity of life» and therefore completely unsatisfactory.

In order to let the world come into existence, and then to continue to be itself and not just an emanation of God's own being, an omnipotent Creator would somehow have to restrain or «rein in» the divine presence and power.

These words are addressed to Jesus, and we must not fail to notice that the transcendent Creator and Judge can be identified as the ultimate ground of selfhood only at the moment when an immanent and totally human Jesus can be named as the divine Creator and Redeemer!

Odd's that said carpenter was the divine seed of the creator of the universe magicly implanted in a human?

In a commingling of Creator and creation, he says that God is actually «immanent» and it is thus correct to say that the earth is «divine.»

This is where we gain our knowledge of God as Creator and Ruler of the world; our concept of him as loving Judge and Redeemer of men; our belief that Jesus Christ is his Son and our Lord and Savior; and the idea that the Holy Spirit is our ever - present Guide and divine Companion.

But on occasion he uses much stronger language: the property he is describing «requires a divine foundation» (emphasis added); it «provides new strength for the arguments that point to a Creator»; it «clearly suggests the existence of a divine source of power and perfection.»

Not what u see on CNN, not what your mum said nor your pastor or priest said and not what u see some Muslims neighbors of yours do... noooo nay,,, what have u searched your self... i dare u do... find the true, i swear nothing makes any sense as Islam does, those guys know the whole truth... even if it will hurt, just like Santa - clause when u 12 year or the rats that gives money to the de toothing kid in our Ugandan myth, u deserve to know the truth... and if no scientist has come out and disproved the divine origin of this universe logically then there must be a mighty some one behind it and that Creator or whatever it is, HE has a way, a straight path to Him and we are obliged to know it... so my adverse to u is look hard for the true coz it is clear from false, even if u may hate it!!

Hence, let us return to the great love of our Creator and his divine Son Jesus Christ.

Satan is a creature of God who exists only because of God's creative activity, and yet, now that Satan exists, he is not simply under the divine thumb but is engaged in mortal combat with the creator for the devotion of human beings.

As (I think) your christological article in the «Call to Covenant Community» assumes, gospel has more to do with the humanity of God than with the divinity of Christ; that is, it posits the divine origins of Jesus of Nazareth as the necessary theological presupposition of its primary testimony to the ultimacy of the Creator's world - orientation (John 3:16!).

An actually creating, loving creator is the only unqualified necessity; all else more specific or particular than this abstract essence is contingent, the play of divine - creaturely freedom.

Since this divine individuality can not be gradually introduced into the creative process, that process can not be allowed to progressively culminate in the Christ, but must be seen merely as the material basis for the sudden irruption of the Logos - Creator from beyond.

This God was indeed creator and sovereign ruler, but also the God who would and did communicate the divine self to humankind, so that they could know God as the loving parent of those children.

The symbol of the divine Son is a way of pointing to those places, times, and events in which the nature and character of the transcendent Creator are disclosed and discovered.

This approach to transcendence is indeed one of the biggest theological gulfs between Islam and a religion which speaks of divine self - revelation and of a creaturely destiny in the life of the Creator.

That God the Creator is disclosed in the divine drama of the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Many Gnostic Christians believed that, because of his divine origins, Jesus did not suffer on the cross, that the heavens were populated by all sorts of entities including a lower Creator God and a superior God of Light — and that knowledge of one's ultimate origins from the latter was the key to salvation.

We do not deny or circumscribe the Creator, because we hold he has created the self - acting originating human mind, which has almost a creative gift; much less then do we deny or circumscribe His power, if we hold that He gave matter such laws as by their blind instrumentality moulded and constructed through innumerable ages the world as we see it... Mr Darwin's theory need not then be atheistical, be it true or not; it may simply be suggesting a larger idea of Divine Prescience and Skill... At first sight I do not see that «the accidental evolution or organic beings» is inconsistent with divine design - It is accidental to us, not to God.»

Because such existence is intrinsically intelligible to man and dependent upon human intelligence, by analogy we are enabled to affirm the divine mind and Creator of the whole cosmos.

To speak so does, I think, demand a high measure of participation in its story, and an effort to understand it first in its own terms — to grasp the Old Testament's own fundamental assertion that its story from beginning to end is the account of the historical action of God seeking the reconciliation of man and God, the human and the divine, the creature and the Creator.

Thus I should say that if the story of Jesus» life had been told just as it seemed — and in a sense was — at the time it was occurring, that story would not have been adequately or truly told or that life was a part of a supremely significant, a divine event, the event through which God, the Creator and the Ruler of all nature as well as the Lord of history, was entering into man's life with new redemptive power; but that fact was not grasped clearly, if at all, till the event had reached its culmination in the resurrection, the coming of the Spirit, and the creation of the community.

The gift of faith, ordered to divine truth, moves through hope in divine omnipotence and compassion, and finds its active rest in the participation in the life of the Creator.

The life and ministry of Christ had been divine; their own interior experience of spiritual renewal and sustentation was divine; their God was no longer a cosmic creator, father, and king only, but, as well, a revelatory character, «full of grace and truth,» and an indwelling spiritual presence.

Others said matter was really eternal and the Creator was only an Artificer, a divine Shaper of things which already existed.

Insofar as the word creator means the source of determination, it corresponds to the level of the intelligible, not of the divine, of the one - multiple, not of the one.

In view of all that inheres in the first four «words» and in the light of what is there already affirmed both explicitly and by inference; in consideration of ancient Eastern modes of thought and the characteristic psychological identification one always made of his own life with the life of immediate and also more distant progenitors; in recognition of the meaning of Covenant, together with Israel's faith in God's creation and his continuing exercise of the powers and prerogatives of Creator and Sustainer - in acknowledgment of all this it is apparent that the intention of the fifth commandment is to establish and perpetuate not merely the parental but by and through the parental the divine claim upon every life in Israel.

That a divine being created the world — is not faith in the Creator, but a theory of the origin of the world, which signifies nothing.

Just because a divine creator isn't entirely out of the realm of possibilities doesn't make it likely.

Clearly, there are no real gods, or if there are, they don't really care what people believe — they're fine with holy wars and millions of people with conflicting supernatural beliefs all certain that their beliefs are the really true magical divine truth of the real invisible universe creator In any case, I'm sure we can both trust that real gods can manage peoples beliefs on their own and don't need you to manipulate others on their behalf.

These words written in this text are filled with the light and love of creator... if you have read this blog, you have been filled with divine light.

The importance of belief in a divine Creator - Judge lay in the pressure it placed on individuals to conform to what they knew to be right.

Lowe's emphasis on the horror of the First World War is certainly right also in the case of Russell, and the difference between him and Whitehead is that Russell was most reluctant to take the further step toward «a God of love who was not a personal creator but a divine factor in the universe, a Harmony that is always present, not overruling but beckoning and preserving» (144).

The Freesh - maker, raw food rapper, and divine recipe creator, Jonny Freesh, is letting me giveaway 2 copies of his new ebook Raw Food Made Fun, Easy & Beautiful!!

But few have noted that the idea at the core of the book, M - theory, is the subject of an ongoing scientific debate — specifically over the very aspect of the theory that might scrap the need for a divine creator.

Such a system, Behe argues, could not have evolved step by step, so it must be the result of intentional design (presumably, but not explicitly, by a divine creator).

I first made these divine energy bites with Mickey, the creator of the AutoImmune Protocol.