You will release patterns that hinder positive movement, self - expression and fulfillment
of your divine purpose.
The sense of imperfection leads to a concept
of divine purpose.
This is because the Bible contemplates man as morally responsible within the framework
of the divine purpose.
If God's action is identified in terms of his intentions, the cosmic drama can be interpreted as an expression
of the divine purpose.
What is at stake, in my own conviction, is the seeing that it is not so much beyond, as it is in and through, «the flaming ramparts of space and time» that redemption, re-integration, and the fulfillment
of the divine purpose of love takes place.
It is too bad that some zealous theologians have tried to argue that this self - realization has been made (by those who talk in fairly secular terms) a substitute for the fulfillment
of the divine purpose.
Once that response has been made, it establishes a new situation permitting the intensification
of divine purpose.
This destiny is seen as the consummation of the creation and as the realization
of the divine purpose for the world.
Yet in the absence of any comparable witness to the intensification
of divine purpose for man this historical recital is indispensable.
The intention
of divine purpose and meaning was frustrated by pride, by the rejection of given order.
Our discipleship, which often has tended to be moralistic in a legal sense, also needs to be reconceived so that love has the preeminence, rather than the coldly moralistic interpretations
of the divine purpose so often taught the past and even today hanging on in many supposedly Christian circles.
What he presupposed was (a) the truth of the ancient revelation, (b) the final arrival of that stage in the accomplishment of the divine will which the prophets had predicted as coming to pass in «the latter days,» and (c) the validity of his own insight into and declaration
of the divine purpose and commandment.
A note which permeates biblical thinking, in contrast with the cyclical or static views often found in other faiths, is that all history moves toward the fulfillment
of a divine purpose — toward an end in the double sense of both finish and fulfillment.
So soon as only a few years had passed, say three or four, this division in the originally indivisible experience must have insensibly taken place in their minds, for they were intercalary years, so to speak, not provided for in their first calendar
of the divine purpose.
These impel them into full and busy lives in the light
of a divine purpose whose extent remains finally unknowable.
Therefore the tradition has spoken insistently of judgment — or to use perhaps a better word, appraisal — both moment by moment and at the conclusion of every human life, with a further appraisal made when the entire created order is evaluated in its contribution or failure to contribute to the advancement
of the divine purpose in the world.
The preacher can now use the story to make plain to his hearers that the event of Jesus Christ is indeed on a genuinely human level; like all the rest of us, Jesus had to grow and develop in his awareness
of the divine purpose in the world.
Obviously my prayers for the departed will not be effectual in persuading God to do what already God must be doing — remembering them once they have been received into the divine life and employing their human accomplishments for the furthering
of the divine purpose.
To postulate the truth of the second alternative — that is to say, to accept that in terms
of the divine purpose the two impulses are one — is to define in its essentials, and in all its splendour, the attitude of Christian humanism.
Thus a sense
of divine purpose along with a religious experience growing out of hope is generated.
For Jesus» language in all its vigorous overstatement still reflects a sense of divine fury over the failure
of the divine purpose to work itself out in the actions of human beings that does not compute with our urbane, 20th - century middle - class liberal Christianity.
Jesus» language in all its vigorous overstatement still reflects a sense of divine fury over the failure
of the divine purpose to work itself out in the actions of human beings that does not compute with our urbane, 20th - century middle - class liberal Christianity.
For they are expressions
of the divine purpose as well as the means of developing the human spirit.
The structure
of the divine purposings can be analyzed apart from any presumptive claim to private knowledge of what God's purposes in fact are.
The history of Israel assumes such religious importance because it proved to be the arena of a very dramatic intensification
of divine purposes, generating both the expectation of the Lord's anointed and the awareness of God's involvement in the suffering of the world.
Once, however, God is conceived as exerting his power directly, or by means of heavenly creatures wholly subservient to his will, the actual deployment of historical forces becomes irrelevant to the realization
of divine purposes.
Not exact matches
yo the thing is not about believing or not, is the fact that if we don't believe then we are worthless living garbage who occupy a space in the universe only to create crap and pollution, in that kind
of case we would better be recycled into some industrial material for a better use than eating and living like cattle, but if there is a god we acquire a
divine status and a
purpose to continue to exist beyond afterlife or at least the idea
of it, which would give life a sense right?
We are confident that the Lord is watching over His gospel and over those who have been called by the gospel, and we are sure that the forces
of hell will not be able to thwart His
divine purpose.
No, according to Christian theology God determines and acts by the counsel
of his own will, independent
of human thought or input, and for the sole reason
of accomplishing His
divine purpose.
In the Whiteheadian interpretation
of reality, these initial aims proposed by God are not capricious nor due to inscrutable
divine purposes for his creatures, but are relevant aims toward maximizing the intensity
of experience which is possible from the particular perspective
of each concrescing occasion.
I now wish to argue that conformity with the
divine telos may, for
purposes of ethical deliberation, be translated into what I call the maximal happiness principle: so act as to maximize happiness — and, by implication, in the long run.
The emphasis has characteristically been on «a theology
of the infinite» — an inquiry into the identity and existence
of divine beings,
divine activity in history and nature, the
purpose and destiny
of human life as these are revealed by a being called «God» to others called «persons.»
Further, it is this intensity
of the
divine propositional feelings which most contributes to their effectiveness in achieving the
divine purpose in the world.
The very stated
purpose of this blog
of Jeremy Myers is to present the redemption
of God as the
divine plan.
In this way, women would first be given an empowering script about
divine grace that secures their personal identity, affirms the goodness
of their embodiment and sends them forth into the world with renewed agency and
purpose.
If there is an eternal torment, it would have to be created by God for the express
purpose of punishment, and only by His
divine omnipotence would anyone ever be contained within.
If Christians believe that there is a
divine plan for everyone and that everything has a
purpose in that plan, then all
of them should believe that every move
of every player in every game is part
of that plan.
There can be no doubt that what he takes over in his letter from a great philosophical tradition and from other pagan sources is included by him in this comprehensive concept
of divine paideia, for if it were not so, he could not have used it for his
purpose in order to convince the people
of Corinth
of the truth
of his teachings.»
How can Christians speak
of about the
purposes of God — hence, in some way, God's nature — when we have no knowledge
of the
divine timetable.
(Jeremiah 7:31; 19:5; 32:35) In the next generation Ezekiel tried another apologetic: granting both that the command to sacrifice children was in the Law, as it obviously was, and that Yahweh was responsible for its presence there, he asserted none the less that; Yahweh had given «statutes that were not good, and ordinances wherein they should not live,» for the ultimate
purpose of punishing them with such desolation that they might recognize the
divine hand in their tragedy.
How can Christians speak about the
purpose of God — hence, in some way, God's nature — when we have no knowledge
of the
divine timetable?
For
purposes of brevity, let us simply take up the problem
of medieval painting and sculpture, and ask if God - images here play a significant role, and, more particularly, ask if we can here discover a significant relation between God - images and Christ - images, a relation reflecting a uniquely Christian apprehension
of the evolutionary movement and transformation
of the
divine process.
The Christian approach would ideally include the desire to uncover and probe the goodness, beauty and
divine purpose of creation, as well as an emphasis upon the pre-eminence
of love among men and the dire effects
of sin on creation in general (see Romans 8.22) and on men in particular.
Doubtless the Bible tells
of many miracles, but the basic point
of each story is that God is the living God who works to accomplish the
divine purposes.
Yet the basic certainties stand sure; they concern the dynamic reality who is God, God's pervasive action in the world, God's self - manifestation through the whole range
of creation, God's focal self - expression in Jesus Christ, the effecting
of God's
purpose through loving activity in the world and in human existence, and the assurance that our human life is not an end in itself but finds its fulfillment through reception into the
divine life.
Perhaps pursuit
of the maximal human creativity should be constrained by the following principle
of environmental respect: A
purpose that reduces natural creativity relative to some alternative for the decision in question is a violation
of the maximal
divine good unless the
purpose is required in order to maximize human creativity in the long run.8 All implications considered, I expect that maximizing human creativity itself includes adherence to this principle.
Virtually all previous representatives
of the modern natural law tradition, including Grotius and even Hobbes, had in some way or other related natural rights to
divine power or command, which served as the source for the directives
of natural law notwithstanding that these did not derive from a
divine telos or comprehensive
purpose.
But again, and even with the possible implication
of divine judgment in the death
of Rachel, we see the repeated motif
of the Jacob cycle: the tension between sin and
divine grace, the expression
of faith that Jacob - Israel is saved and redeemed only by the will and
purpose of God (35:5), and finally the repetition
of the promise and the blessing, and the second account
of the changing
of Jacob's name to Israel.
The story
of Jacob is supported only by
divine grace, only by
divine intention and
purpose.
Accordingly, the first precept
of practical reason is that «good is to be done and promoted, and evil is to be avoided» (637, emphasis deleted), which means that the natural law is somehow derived from the comprehensive good defined by the final end or
divine purpose.