Sentences with phrase «of driver dummies»

They noticed that force limiters allowed more movement of driver dummies during the tests.

The movement of the driver dummy was reasonably well controlled during the frontal test.

In the full width frontal test, the Touran scored maximum points for its protection of the driver dummy, with good protection of all critical body areas.

In the full - width rigid barrier test, the pelvis of the driver dummy slipped beneath the lap section of the seatbelt and protection of this area was rated as poor.

Protection of the driver dummy in the same test was good or adequate.

In the full - width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver dummy was good for all critical parts of the body and that of the rear passenger was good apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate.

Chest protection for the rear passenger dummy was adequate and that of the driver dummy was again marginal.

Another restraint and kinematics issue Institute engineers flagged was excessive forward movement of the driver dummy caused by too much shoulder belt webbing spooling out of the retractor.

In the full width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver dummy was good for all critical body areas while, for the rear passenger, protection of the neck was adequate and that of the chest was marginal.

The head of the driver dummy in the Saturn brushed past the standard side curtain airbag and was struck by the intruding barrier.

Compression of the driver dummy's chest indicated weak protection of this part of the body and injury parameters for the lower legs revealed marginal protection.

In the full - width rigid - barrier test, protection of the driver dummy was good but readings indicated that the force in the lap section of the seatbelt had dropped during the impact.

Protection of the neck of the driver dummy was also rated as weak.

In the full - width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver dummy was good for all critical body areas and, for the rear passenger dummy, it was good apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate.

In the full - width rigid barrier test, the head of the driver dummy exceeded critical limits for deceleration.

In the full width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver dummy was good for all body areas apart from the chest, which was adequately protected.

During the crash, the lap portion of the driver dummy's lap / shoulder belt detached from its anchorage near the door and moved into the passenger's seat.

Not exact matches

At the press of a button, a canister of compressed gas inflates the hidden dummy, which rises to fill the seat alongside the driver.

During this stringent front - overlap test, the IIHS found that the 2016 Kia Sorento had minimal intrusion into the driver's space, and significantly improved control of the dummy's motion compared with the 2014 - 2015 Kia Sorento, which received «Poor» ratings for the small overlap front crash test.

The 2008 model of the Scirocco received a five star safety rating from EuroNCAP even after the driver test dummy's head hit the steering wheel when the airbag bottomed out.

Driver — In both tests, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Intrusion into the driver's space was reasonably well controlled, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Likewise, in the side barrier test, the head of the dummy representing a 10 - year - old child, seated behind the driver, struck the roof frame in the Mercedes - Benz C - Class Cabriolet as the side airbag did not fully cover the impact area.

Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both driver and passenger.

Protection of the driver's chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of chest compression.

Intrusion into the driver's space was maintained reasonably well, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Except for door hinge pillar deformation and parking brake pedal movement (pedal not visible), intrusion into the driver's space was reasonably well controlled, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Driver dummy injury and head protection ratings for the 2009 model are assigned by the Institute as part of side crash test verification.

The driver's space was maintained well in both tests, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

The driver knee airbag deployed to protect the dummy's knees and lower legs, but forces on the right foot were just high enough to indicate the possibility of injuries.

Driver — In the test of the 2009 model, measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

After the dummy moved forward into the airbag, it rebounded toward the driver door, and its head hit the inside of the door above the armrest.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that serious skull fracture and / or brain injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity, as well as rib fractures and / or internal organ injuries.

In the side impact test for both models, measures taken from both the driver dummy and the passenger dummy seated in the rear seat indicated low risk of significant injuries in a real - world crash like this one.

Injury measures obtained from the two dummies, one in the driver seat and the other in the back seat behind the driver, are used to determine the likelihood that a driver and / or passenger in a real - world crash would have sustained serious injury to various parts of the body.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummies in the two tests indicate that rib fractures would be possible in a crash of this severity.

However, injury measures recorded on the driver dummy indicate the possibility of rib fractures and internal organ injuries in real - world crashes of similar severity.

Driver — The dummy's head was hit by the window sill of the driverDriver — The dummy's head was hit by the window sill of the driverdriver door.

«In the side test of the Neon, the barrier hit the heads of both the driver and rear passenger dummies,» Lund points out.

Except for door hinge pillar deformation and intrusion of the parking brake pedal (not visible), the driver's space was maintained reasonably well, and risk of injuries to the dummy's legs and feet was low.

Injury measures obtained from the 2 dummies, one in the driver seat and the other in the back seat behind the driver, are used to determine the likelihood that a driver and / or passenger in a similar real - world crash would sustain serious injury to various parts of the body.

In the test without the head protection airbag, the heads of the driver and rear passenger dummies were struck by the hood of the pickup truck.

Twenty - five percent of the pickup's total width struck the barrier on the driver side, where a Hybrid III dummy representing an average - size man was positioned at the steering wheel.

A vehicle's overall evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures recorded on a Hybrid III dummy in the driver seat, and analysis of slow - motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.

During rebound, the dummy moved toward the driver door, and its head went part of the way out the open window and hit the B - pillar.

The structure of the older Elantra allowed a lot of intrusion into the occupant compartment, and driver dummy injury measures indicated that rib fractures, internal organ injuries, and a broken left leg would be possible in a real - world crash.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and a fracture of the pelvis would be possible in a crash of this severity.

Although the overall side crash protection still would have been rated good, with low risk of injuries to both driver and rear passenger dummies, Nissan engineers were concerned about the interference with the deployment of the side curtain airbag.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that head injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity.