They seem to be trying too hard to balance ecclesial magisterium and subjective authority in order to avoid the («pre-Vatican II» again) ultramontanist «attempt to conjure certitude out of doubt by the assertion
of an ecclesial authority» (pp. 43 and 38).
Since he is a Methodist and not a Roman Catholic or Orthodox Christian, he recognizes that this leaves him with some problems
of ecclesial authority.
This failure, he suggests, then paved the way for a modern, hierarchical reconfiguration
of ecclesial authority, in which Church authorities took a more decisive role in the determination of doctrine.
Not exact matches
As Levy has shown, reformers and their opponents both acknowledged the
authority of Scripture within a traditional,
ecclesial framework.
And there is, in fact, very little evidence that champions
of ecclesial pluralism have bent over backwards to insure that their opponents are given a fair hearing on occasions
of public debate, nor are they conspicuously tolerant or open - minded when they happen themselves to be in positions
of extra-
ecclesial authority — as journal editors, perhaps, or as deans
of theology faculties.
I also see areas where the Reformers seem to have needed to challenge
ecclesial authority to refute clerical abuses — sale
of indulgences and offices — without considering the logical consequences
of their justifications.
It is not sufficient, however, to point out that there are innumerable ministries in the several Christian communities that insist on the objectivity
of truth, the
authority of Scripture and Spirit - guided interpretation, the
ecclesial means
of grace, and the reality
of moral good and evil.
It is not sufficient, however, to point out that there are innumerable ministries in the several Christian communities that insist on the objectivity
of truth, the
authority of Scripture and its Spirit - guided interpretation, the
ecclesial means
of grace, and the reality
of moral good and evil.
We have both an
ecclesial and a political crisis
of authority because, for various reasons, our society no longer has widely shared beliefs and forms
of life to which common reference can be made.
The
ecclesial reality
of the Church is intricately interwoven with its life as a moral community — it has to constantly test its
authority to be the moral voice in the world against its ability to respond with courage and conviction to the voices
of the excluded, the voices from the margins.
With respect to church bodies, my premise is that, given our present
ecclesial and social circumstances, the issue
of authority will serve more to unify the churches than to divide them.
Authority has these characteristics in all realms
of its operation — familial,
ecclesial, or overtly «political.»
Within that tradition, both in its political and
ecclesial expression,
authority is a way
of ordering power within a community in such a way that, at one and the same time, it supports and augments common beliefs and ways
of life and is regularly and harmoniously conjoined with a structure
of offices that gives order to the exercise
of authority and power within the particular society in question.
Protestants are less apt to agree, however, that
authority itself serves the positive function
of promoting the plenitude
of gifts and blessings
ecclesial and political life are supposed to encompass.
In the authentically Catholic vision
of the Second Vatican Council, the source
of authority for the transmission
of Revelation is Jesus Christ Himself, the Word
of God made flesh for us, handed down to us in Scripture and
ecclesial Tradition.
Can the bishop
of Hippo, the establisher
of orthodox dogma and
ecclesial authority, really be linked with Machiavelli, Newton, Descartes, Gibbon, Locke, Hume, Voltaire, Kant, Marx and Darwin, to name a few shapers
of the modern spirit?
Its reliance on legislative and judicial procedures to decide a complex theological, moral, and
ecclesial matter has only heightened even more the disagreement while minimizing the possibility
of serious, sustained engagement on basic issues such as theological anthropology, justification and sanctification, the nature
of sin, repentance and forgiveness, Scriptural
authority, and the nature and purpose
of ordained ministry.
The natural law is a body
of unchanging moral principles known not from revelation (though parallel to it) but by reason, principles regarded as a basis for all human conduct: to speak in this way
of «the humanisation
of sexuality» is simply the understanding
of the natural law in particular human circumstances: there is no movement away from natural law - say, to revelation or
ecclesial authority; we are stillwithin its ambit.
The Reformed catholic project attempts to lessen the ambiguity
of the Reformed tradition by emphasizing the
ecclesial context
of theology, and the importance
of «subordinate
authorities» — such as pastoral ministry, councils, creeds, and interpretative traditions — that mediate the Bible's
authority.
It is very hard to see, however, how an
ecclesial tradition could provide «authoritative parameters» for Scripture exposition, if the Church's interpretative
authority has no other basis than the actual correctness
of its interpretative decisions.
This highly ambiguous notion has done a great deal
of harm, and has all too often been used to pour scorn on anything that can be labelled simplistic, overly dependent on
authority, or — that other great bogey
of today's Church — «fundamentalist,» which is usually a code word for anyone who believes the Gospel might actually be worth believing and acting on, especially if they belong to one
of the new
ecclesial movements.
Any teaching that reflects a high level
of representation in the
ecclesial community possesses
authority.
But
ecclesial authority is grounded in love, the love
of God in Christ.