Sentences with phrase «of education debate»

In the wake of a report earlier this year which found students at online schools lost out on a full year's worth of learning, both sides of the education debate openly criticized the schools.

Some of the Democratic candidates address school facility needs in their policy statements, but the majority of education debate has focused on the merits of NCLB.

The point of all education debate in my mind should center on student achievement.

For starters, we point out the fundamental truth of the education debate.

Andy Rotherham admonished that the lack of education debate this time around doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the absence of a campaign to promote education issues.

Where I come out — you can read more in «The End of the Education Debate» — is that America needs not less education reform but far more fundamental and radical reform.

In September he will leave NAHT in a strong position at the centre of the education debate.»

These diaries read very well, although there are occasions when the reader is overwhelmed by the details of the education debates and the munitae of Lib Dem policy making.

Local control of public education has become the rallying cry for many folks on all sides of education debates, from Tea Party libertarians to Bernie Sanders progressives, but local control isn't an end in itself.

Not exact matches

And, as the mother of daughters, I now see the merit in carving out all - female spaces for education, debate, and building relationships.

His bid for the presidency was marred by a seemingly inadequate knowledge of national affairs, which was most pronounced during a televised debate that showed Perry unable to remember the name of a third federal department he'd said he planned to cut, along with the Departments of Commerce and Education.

Carving out all - female spaces for education, debate, and building relationships is more powerful than many of us realize.

While the cost of higher education continues to rise and politicians debate the idea of making it free, a majority of Americans are feeling stressed about student loans.

His questioning of the presumed superiority of prestigious schools — students may fare better at less - elite institutions where their self - esteem takes less of a beating — adds a provocative wrinkle to the hot debate over education.

That thought, on display during Wednesday's presidential debates, is also at the heart of a battle raging between Democrats and Republicans, whose views about governement involvment in everything from health care and education to business are diametrically opposed.

The debate over the value of higher education for aspiring entrepreneurs rages.

He has repeatedly name checked countries like Denmark and Sweden in interviews and debates, arguing that we should copy policies like mandatory paid leave for new parents and free healthcare and college education to improve the economic lives of ordinary Americans.

The debate over the age of consent for access to digital services distracts from the fact that we all need a balanced education on technology, argues John Kennedy.

April 6: Facebook says it will require admins of popular pages and advertisers buying political or «issue» ads on «debated topics of national legislative importance» like education or abortion to verify their identity and location — in an effort to fight disinformation on its platform.

After more than seven hours of emotional debate that hit the sensitive political subjects of gun control, education and race, the House voted 67 - 50 in favor of the bill, sending it to Gov. Rick Scott.

Produced by The Idea Village in partnership with Solomon Group, NOEW engages a dynamic locally relevant, globally significant network of entrepreneurs, investors, corporations, non-profits, students, and professionals to support growing companies and elevate entrepreneurial successes through six days of discussion, debate, education, competition, and celebration in a city like no other.

The hour - and - a-half long debate saw Notley outline her vision of a province where health care and education are protected by asking corporations to pay their fair share.

I pray to whichever holy name (God, Allah, Jehovah, Krishna, Jesus, etc.) suits the ONE Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent being that ignorance is wiped away from our species and we become a closer, more loving, peaceful creature and that we realize how much time we waste and how much further we push our fellow neighbor and brother under God, regardless of creed, away debating over who's God is better and discover the error of our ways before we destroy each other... before it's too late, because The End is Nigh!!!!! LOL!!!!! Really though, isn't the world full of enough tragedy, and aren't their so many more important things that need our energy and attention like the innocent children in Pakistan dying from diseases from the flood or the homeless children in our own country, or the lack of education, which is exactly what leads to this kind of debate?

In a tour de force that will likely be debated for decades to come, Souter focused on two cases: the Brown v. Board of Education desegregation case of 1954, and the New York Times Co. v. United States Pentagon Papers case of 1971.

The Pope Center for Higher Education Policy debates the question, «Should colleges be required to pay out a percentage of their endowments?»

Most of the contentiousness in this debate is largely born of no education or miseducation as to what the various scientific positions are.

Today this overlaps with debates about the actual content of religious education and about the freedom to offer children what the Church really teaches.

Insistence on the importance of that point for theological education is one of the major contributions of the Mud Flower Collective to the agenda of the debate about what makes theological education theological.

Thus Wood's proposal adds an important new issue to the agenda: In what conceptuality do we most fruitfully formulate the basic issues confronting theological education today, propose resolutions of those issues, and debate our disagreements?

Do not say there is not a right and wrong in this debate; there's a right, and an ignorance of the right, whether that ignorance is because of lack of education in biology / chemistry / theoretical physics or a choice to ignore facts so that a person can comfortably keep their faith intact or both.

Both sides in this debate argue away from the assumption that a rather rich education, and a pretty fair amount of experience in the world, would be required of anyone who might plausibly be designated author of the Shakespeare corpus.

That, if they would only listen to themselves more carefully, is what some advocates of academic freedom are asserting in current debates about Christian higher education.

In an eerie foreshadowing of today's debates over character education, journalists warned that the family could not do it alone: the schools had to help.

Conservatives and liberals alike have debated the use of faith - development theory in Christian education.1

Atheism and IQ A faith — science debate has also emerged in the pages of the Times Higher Education.

Nor has the debate focused on questions about the future integrity of the enterprise of theological education: for example, «How can we strengthen and preserve its financial resources?»

Clearly, then, it is important for anyone concerned about the health of theological education, or, more broadly, for anyone concerned about the health of theology, to be aware, not simply of one or another of the voices in the debate, but of the overall structure and movement of the debate as a whole.

Almost thirty years had passed since the last major, comprehensive, and theologically self - conscious study of Protestant theological education.1 It is also remarkable, indeed unprecedented, that such a sustained debate emerged, not in response to one large study of theological education, but as a conversation among several quite different theological points of view.

Rather, the central question in the recent debate has been this: «What is the nature and purpose of specifically theological education?

The debate has not focused on pedagogical questions, on variations of the question, «What is the most effective way to teach in theological education?»

I identify five voices in this debate that I take to be the most completely developed and importantly contrasting «positions» in the conversation: Edward Farley's Theologia: The Fragmentation and Unity of Theological Education and his The Fragility of Knowledge: Theological Education in the Church and the University; 2 the Mud Flower Collective's God s Fierce Whimsy; 3 Joseph C. Hough, Jr., and John B. Cobb, Jr.'s Christian Identity and Theological Education; 4 Max L. Stackhouse's Apologia: Contextualization, Globalization, and Mission in Theological Education; 5 and Charles M. Wood's Vision and Discernment.6 Although each of these voices makes important claims in its own right, which I hope to summarize as briefly as clarity and fairness permit, what is most important, I think, is the largely implicit interplay among them of contrasting insights and themes.

Video of apparent affair surfaces as Christian higher education leaders are debating sexual ethics standards.

AN ATTEMPTED SUMMARY OF CATHOLICISM ON EVOLUTION On October 4th the Council of Europe was scheduled to have debated «The Dangers of Creationism in Education.&raquOF CATHOLICISM ON EVOLUTION On October 4th the Council of Europe was scheduled to have debated «The Dangers of Creationism in Education.&raquof Europe was scheduled to have debated «The Dangers of Creationism in Education.&raquof Creationism in Education.»

Tauhidi takes his place in a long historical debate on parochial education in the U.S. when he says, «Muslims have to wake up and realize that they have to take care of their children.

In view of the current educational debate, we should consider the role of religious education in society and the arguments being put forward by the present - day followers of Sir Robert Peel.

The trigger warning debates have not been a noticeable presence in my part of the world of theological education.

Since the emergence of the religious education movement a half century ago, a debate has gone on, sometimes openly and sometimes covertly, between the advocates of Christian nurture and evangelism.

Those outside the Catholic community in England and Wales who work in this area have begun to take cognisance of the Church's contribution to the current debate on sex and relationship education.

And I completely agree that while the mean - spirited aspects of the debate were disheartening, the * education * and political consciousness - raising were fantastic — and probably more likely to succeed in effecting political - social change than the other forms of debate seen yesterday (and today).

In recent years there has been much debate about the positive outcomes of fathers involvement in their children's education and upbringing and the barriers men face in accessing parental support services (see Ghate et al 2000, Ryan 2000).