As we enter the first year of ESSA's implementation, it's worthwhile to take the temperature of two aspects
of educational accountability in New York City, the largest school district in the nation.
It is a travesty and an outrage that the few rotten apples in this study may be used by
opponents of educational accountability, like the reforms of the No Child Left Behind Act, to charge that testing should be eliminated because the pressure it brings causes cheating.
In a
time of educational accountability and revenue shortfalls, the first question on the minds of policymakers seeking to trim already - lean school budgets often is: How does this program improve student achievement?
While it is too early to know how the implementation of the Common Core State Standards will play out over the next several years, the authors point out that most states are already using CCSS - aligned assessments for the
purposes of educational accountability.
«In this age
of educational accountability through standards and assessments with only one right answer and success measured by test scores, we need to keep young minds open for alternative ways of thinking... teach students not to get a job, but create one.»
Third, today's focus on results - based education, combined with plenty more data on school performance in an
era of educational accountability, means that reform - minded education leaders are getting bolder about closing bad schools — and sometimes (but not always) opening new ones in the same building.
The data currently being gathered by CORE provide a unique opportunity for researchers to study this question and others related to the role of schools in developing student skills and the
design of educational accountability systems.
You see, because the
heart of an educational accountability approach is the use of test results to gauge instructional quality — and because instructional quality should be determined by what students learn — the emphasis of a defensible alignment study must be on the issue of whether instruction was successful.
As there is no software to install on school computers with Bookstream accounts, the time it takes for a teacher to create an account and begin uploading material takes about thirty minutes, an unheard of time span in the
world of educational accountability for technology use.
It is hoped that MPs» findings will do something to provide clarity in the increasingly muddy and obfuscating system
of educational accountability in England today.