Within the first 2 pages of E. Hoskins» paper, he made a number
of egregious mistakes: ``... a warmer world is probably a better, more productive world, as in the past..»
In reply to Andy Park May 26, 2011 at 8:14 pm who claims Hoskins within the first 2 pages of his paper made a number
of egregious mistakes: eg (1): Hoskins: ``... a warmer world is probably a better, more productive world, as in the past..»
Not exact matches
«No financial institution is immune from bad judgment,» Johnson said, reminding Dimon and lawmakers
of the statements Dimon later made: «We made a terrible
egregious mistake.
But to live thus is to be religious; so I unhesitatingly repudiate the survival - theory
of religion, as being founded on an
egregious mistake.
Replay review confirms the targeting and because
of the «
egregious mistake» clause in the replay rulebook (as in, replay review can change anything that was very wrong), the interception is negated.
As for Annette Bening being shut out — her turn in 20th Century Women was a career high — we'll simply chalk that up to being one
of the Academy's more
egregious, unforgivable
mistakes this year.
Which is the intent, based on the satirical write up accompanying the cover, calling the plethora
of HANDS «
egregious mistakes».
Of all the mistakes, the most egregious was the Phaeton, a V - 8 version of which we evaluated as part of a Four Seasons tes
Of all the
mistakes, the most
egregious was the Phaeton, a V - 8 version
of which we evaluated as part of a Four Seasons tes
of which we evaluated as part
of a Four Seasons tes
of a Four Seasons test.
While a lucky few authors are able to correct
egregious mistakes like wrong character names or missing paragraphs in later print runs, most
of the time, errors remain in the text forever.
In the process making an
egregious mistake by falsely accusing the publisher and, in record setting time, publishes a retraction
of his
mistake.
Being
mistaken, even if the error is due to
egregious ignorance
of or disregard for case law, does not support a perjury conviction.
In other words, if the appellate judges believe the lower court got the law wrong, they will reverse its decision; but they will only reverse a finding
of fact if the lower court made an especially
egregious or obvious
mistake.
He then went further, stating that there was «no reason» to suppose it would do anything other than act as an incentive to avoid
egregious errors and eliminate the making
of grievous
mistakes [71].