The Crown Prosecution Service is considering reports from 12 police forces on alleged breaches
of election spending limits by up to 20 Tory MPs.
One thing, however, is very different about this season's presidential campaign: an explosion
of election spending by groups known as super PACs.
Not exact matches
One is Joe Ricketts, the billionaire founder
of TD Ameritrade, who
spent $ 1.3 million in the 2010
elections to publicly shame earmarking «hooligans» in Congress and honor the «heroes» fighting to zero them out.
If it sounds like Edwards still needed to apply FEC rules and limits, consider this: Scott Thomas, a former commissioner
of the Federal
Election Commission testified that he did not consider that the payments would have come under his agency's auspices — in part because they were not used directly for the campaign and did not free up any
of Edwards» own money to be
spent on the campaign.
In her announcement, Gillibrand criticized the 2010 Supreme Court case, Citizens United vs. Federal
Election Commission, which ruled that the government should not regulate the amount
of money corporations and unions can
spend on campaigns.
The
election of Donald Trump as president sparked an exodus from the US Treasury market in the final months
of 2016 and early 2017 as investors prepared for the possibility that Trump's plans for a protectionist trade policy, tax cuts, deregulation, and massive infrastructure
spending would bring inflation back to the US.
A longer
election period has the effect
of allowing political parties to
spend more on their campaigns — the
spending maximum is pro-rated, so that as the official
election period grows, the
spending limit rises proportionally.
In the 2016
election cycle, the average winning Senate candidate had
spent $ 10.4 million through October 19
of that year, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
Instead, the analysis showed that while liberal or pro-Clinton users linked primarily to articles from mainstream news outlets, pro-Trump audiences
spent almost all
of their time linking to alternative sites like Breitbart, many
of which didn't even exist during the previous
election.
The
election of Donald Trump as president sparked an exodus from the Treasury market in the final months
of 2016 as investors began to price in the possibility that Trump's plans for a protectionist trade policy, tax cuts, and massive infrastructure
spending would bring back inflation to the US.
Not only did President Trump defeat sixteen skilled and experienced primary opponents and win the presidency; he did so
spending a fraction
of what his opponent
spent in the general
election.
Jamie Dimon
of JPMorgan told CNBC that «some people are starting to
spend in anticipation»
of tax reform and repatriation resulting from Trump's
election.
«And when a consumer is a little uncertain around their future and really trying to figure out what this
election cycle really means to them, they're not as apt to
spend as freely as they might have even just a couple
of quarters ago,» said Penegor.
Premier Clark
spent the
election campaign expounding her dream
of a debt - free B.C. fueled by resource - driven economic growth.
WA Labor says it will
spend $ 45.5 million to bring new services to Royal Perth Hospital if it wins the March state
election, while the Liberals say they will use about $ 83 million from the partial sale
of Western Power to build three new Tafe facilities.
Expanding on its allegations, WSJ said on Tuesday that hundreds
of millions worth
of unreported political
spending flowed from public sources or programs intended for other purposes, including at least $ 140 million that was
spent on charity projects to boost the party's
election chances.
Secretary
of State Rex Tillerson was offered $ 60 million by Congress from Defense Department funds last year to fight Russian
election interference efforts — but after Tillerson waited for seven months trying to decide whether he wanted to
spend it or not, the offer was withdrawn, and none
of the money was used, according to The New York Times.
The Federal
Election Commission has previously ruled that candidates and federal office holders may
spend campaign funds on legal fees that are part
of legal actions that would not have been necessary if they were not a candidate.
TORONTO — Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne went into a 40 - day
election campaign facing a Red Sea
of troubles: a massive $ 12.5 - billion deficit, several
spending scandals and a police investigation that reached all the way to the premier's office.
Federal
Election Commission records show that these groups, as well as five other grant recipients of Crossroads GPS, spent money on political ads, directly or indirectly, in the 2010 electio
Election Commission records show that these groups, as well as five other grant recipients
of Crossroads GPS,
spent money on political ads, directly or indirectly, in the 2010
electionelection cycle.
Although similar nonprofits engaged in politics in past
elections, their use exploded in 2010, particularly in tandem with super PACs, taking advantage
of federal court rulings that paved the way for a new role for outside -
spending groups in
elections.
The top 10 lists for both parties reveal that in the 2012
election season, Democrats
spent a total
of $ 3.1 million at their favorite spots.
The parent company
of Clear Channel Communications, one
of the nation's biggest radio station and outdoor advertising firms, saw its 2013 loss widen as political
spending dropped without a presidential
election to drive results.
Abzug's push for Women's Equality Day was, in fact, far more symbolic than many
of the more concrete policies she made a reality in her six years in Congress, not to mention in the two decades prior to her
election, which she
spent as a lawyer fighting for human rights and civil rights.
Morgan is a close friend
of Trump's — Trump
spent more time talking to Morgan on the phone after the
election than he did with British Prime Minister Theresa May.
Within hours
of the presidential
election, Washington politicians turned to the most urgent issue facing them: the fiscal cliff looming on Jan. 1, when more than $ 100 billion in automatic
spending cuts and $ 500 billion
of tax increases will be triggered.
As
of last week, SuperPACs had
spent $ 228,363,178 on the 2012
elections.
He added: «Crooked Hillary Clinton
spent hundreds
of millions
of dollars more on Presidential
Election than I did.
Not too long after that, Cuban turned on the Republican candidate and
spent the rest
of the
election cycle as one
of his most outspoken critics.
The court struck down a Montana law that limited the ability
of corporations to
spend money influencing state
elections.
Attempts by Monti's government to cut
spending caused widespread public anger, boosting the support
of populist parties in the
election.
And,
of the approximately $ 1 billion
spent on the
election by both parties, around $ 54 million has been
spent on digital advertising, including mobile.
This decision probably shouldn't have been a surprise, because it basically said that the court's 2010 decision in the Citizens United case, upholding the right
of corporations to
spend money in federal
elections, applies to the states as well.
Spokesman James Davis said the network would
spend between $ 300 million and $ 400 million ahead
of the 2018
elections, much
of it devoted to the organization's nationwide grassroots organization to help educate voters and hold elected officials accountable.
The Liberals have introduced changes as they try to fulfil their 2015
election promise to improve Parliament's financial processes by bringing more consistency and clarity when it comes to government accounting
of how it
spends public money.
A version
of this article appears in print on November 28, 2009, on Page A14
of the New York edition with the headline: With Late Rush, Mayor
Spent $ 102 Million on
Election.
«The group knows that it can do some candidate
election work, but that such work can't be its primary activity — i.e., it has to
spend more than half
of its budget on non-candidate-
election work,» Ryan told The Daily Beast when provided documentation about the organization.
«By contrast, federal tax law permits 501 (c)(4) organizations to
spend money advocating the
election or defeat
of candidates, so long as such activity isn't the 501 (c)(4) organization's «primary» activity.
Further, according to BofA - Merrill's analyst team at a midyear press conference on Wednesday in New York, any positive budgetary effect
of the tax increases would be overshadowed by the growing burden
of the U.S. debt ceiling as
spending and hiring decisions are put on hold and the
election heightens partisanship.
Apart from the occasional sound - bite on military
spending, the Iraq war, and missile defence, Canada's role in the world was not part
of the mainstream
election debate.
Collins pointed out that a big part
of UK (and indeed US)
election law relates to «declaration
of spent», before making the conjoined point that if someone is «hiding that
spend» — i.e. by placing dark ads that only the recipient sees, and which can be taken offline immediately after the campaign — it smells like a major risk to the democratic process.
For sure, Mr. Moore would be on surer footing here if the Conservative Party
of Canada hadn't pleaded guilty to violating
election spending limits in 2008 and if the Harper government wasn't the only government in this country's history to have been found in contempt
of Parliament and if the RCMP wasn't said to be presently investigating Mr. Harper's former chief
of staff and and if two Conservative MPs weren't presently in court with
Elections Canada and if the Prime Minister hadn't left for Peru without facing the House on the first day that Parliament was in session after the deal between Mr. Wright and Mr. Duffy was revealed and if the Prime Minister hadn't fail to show up in the House on the following Monday and if Mr. Duffy hadn't remained a Conservative senator for awhile despite having apparently claimed a housing allowance he shouldn't have.
The Trump campaign
spent nearly $ 700,000 in legal consulting fees — or about 15.5 %
of its total expenses between April 1 and June 30, according to the latest Federal
Election Commission report.
However in another exchange the Facebook exec appeared not to be aware
of a basic tenet
of UK
election law — which prohibits campaign
spending by foreign entities.
Going into the 2014 civic
elections, the last until 2018, how open are local governments around southwestern British Columbia when it comes to the
spending and meetings
of their mayors?
Trump's charity, the Donald J. Trump Foundation, faced intense scrutiny during the
election for
spending money on items like a $ 20,000 portrait
of Trump.
on his ability to push through other items on his agenda, such as tax reform, infrastructure
spending and deregulation — the promise
of which has helped propel stocks upward since his
election.
The report argues that the current lack
of rules around third parties creates a huge loophole in financing limits — essentially, anyone who wants to
spend a ton
of money to influence an
election can simply channel it away from parties, corporations and unions and instead pour it into an interest group.
The ruling, Citizens United v. Federal
Election Commission, No. 08 - 205, overruled two precedents: Austin v. Michigan Chamber
of Commerce, a 1990 decision that upheld restrictions on corporate
spending to support or oppose political candidates, and McConnell v. Federal
Election Commission, a 2003 decision that upheld the part
of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act
of 2002 that restricted campaign
spending by corporations and unions.
«Today's budget delivered on the government's
election promise to boost
spending for social programs and stimulate growth in key sectors
of our economy.