Obama's administration allowed federal funding
of embryonic stem cell research if the following conditions applied:
Not exact matches
If we are against the use
of stem cell research on the basis
of embryonic destruction, shouldn't we also be against in - vitro fertilization clinics because there are always excess embryos that get discarded?
«It's an exciting development, and we await the outcome over the next year to see how well these
cells integrate, and
if there are any potential adverse reactions,» says Mike Cheetham
of the Institute
of Ophthalmology at University College London, one site where
research is under way into a human
embryonic stem -
cell treatment for AMD.
If dealing with the public relations nightmare over its on - off - on funding
of Planned Parenthood wasn't enough, the Susan G. Komen for the Cure cancer charity last week also got entangled, somewhat bizarrely, in the debate over human
embryonic stem (ES)
cell research.
While the potential
of adult
stem cells has been understood for some time, researchers have argued that the pluripotency
of embryonic stem cells — their ability to be transformed into most
if not all
of the various
cell types
of the body — make them more valuable both for
research and potentially someday for treatment.
I think a lot
of people were led to believe — and to what extent scientists were responsible for this is an interesting question — that
if only the regulations were relaxed,
embryonic stem -
cell science would be central to our medical
research and practice going into the future, and that it would massively alleviate suffering and produce cures for dreaded diseases.
Bush sought to honor the spirit,
if not, perhaps, the letter,
of Dickey - Wicker by providing funding for
embryonic stem -
cell research without incentivizing further embryo destruction.
University
of Wisconsin scientist, James A. Thomson, who first derived ESCs from embryos, has said «
if human
embryonic stem cell research does not make you at least a little bit uncomfortable, you have not thought about it enough.»
Wicker, no political naïf, brought out the big rhetorical ammo, reminding the senators that it was Jamie Thomson, the University
of Wisconsin scientist who first reported isolating the
cells in 1998, who said: «
If human
embryonic stem cell research does not make you at least a bit uncomfortable, you have not thought about it enough.»
The Society believes that
research involving the transfer
of a human nucleus into an animal egg will lead to important new knowledge about
cell nuclear replacement (CNR) technology and,
if it were to prove possible to produce
embryonic stem cells by this route, would increase understanding
of how to programme these
cells to develop into different tissue types.