Or has peak oil been a central tenet
of environmental thought?
A searing critique
of environmental thought has emerged from an unlikely source — contemporary French philosophy.
Steven Rubenstein Professor for Environment and Natural Resources / Professor
of Environmental Thought and Culture Environmental Program / Rubenstein School of Environment & Natural Resources
Adrian J. Ivakhiv, a professor
of environmental thought and culture at the University of Vermont, blogged on the name question ahead of a breakfast panel on the response of the arts and humanities to this concept of a human - driven geological epoch.
Bilbro also makes a compelling argument that the presumed pioneers
of environmental thought were not as revolutionary as their modern irreligious readers might assume.
In refusing to make an idol of humanity, some species
of environmental thought make an idol of the universe itself.
A more cheerful note came from Camilla Born,
of the environmental think tank E3G.
Jonathan Porritt, founder
of environmental think - tank Forum for the Future, agreed.
As the influence
of environmental thinking has increased its hold over the political establishment, the failure to win the public support that might create the basis for decisive action to save the planet has also increasingly been blamed on climate sceptics operating on the internet.
The movement to make ecocide a crime against peace under international law, led by UK - based lawyer Polly Higgins, as well as efforts to grant legal rights to Mother Earth, such as Bolivia has done, is exactly where we need to be going in terms of the highest level
of environmental thinking: Recognizing that destroying whole swaths of the planet, with little to no concern for the effect on all the creatures that live upon it, is not just unethical, unacceptable behavior, but is also a crime, a crime against humanity, a crime against life itself.
Not exact matches
And, again, this is the core example
of the evolution
of environmental bullshit: a long history
of industry creation
of lies; conservative funding
of think - tanks, front groups and the echo chamber; the development
of an ideological imperative
of denialism; and then the necessity
of completely groundless bullshit to shore up the lies.
«I
think far less than 1 percent
of the 7.4 billion people on earth are driven by the
environmental benefit
of plant - based food.
One school
of thought says she should just plow ahead with her
environmental agenda; history will be on her side in the end, since no one today (outside
of maybe a few U.S. Republicans) doubts that the question
of phasing out fossil fuels is not a matter
of if but when.
The
environmental impact is potentially huge: Just
think about all
of those FedEx, UPS, and Amazon packages that require labeling.
«I
think it's too early to make any judgments on what I would call the very short opening statement, and we'll see what happens as we go forward,» Gerard told reporters at a conference
of the BlueGreen Alliance, a coalition
of large labor unions and
environmental groups.
The problems facing us, many
of them are global, like rogue nuclear states, like climate change, and other forms
of environmental threats, like terrorists, like maximizing global wealth and prosperity, and none
of these are going to be solved if we
think of the international arena as one
of each nation striving for its individual greatness.
«Larger companies are starting to see the benefit
of thinking about not just profit, but about societal and
environmental value as well,» says Chou.
But for those who are concerned about Keystone pipeline coming through the U.S., some look at what they
think they know about the
environmental performance
of the oilsands and say, «I'm not comfortable with that.»
Verle Sutton, who co-wrote the MediaIdeas report and is a veteran
of the U.S. paper industry,
thinks producers should follow Domtar's lead and be more aggressive in telling the
environmental story, «but the media doesn't take them too seriously.»
In fact, 29 %
of respondents in the recent poll
think that
environmental spending should decrease, which is up from the 9 % who felt that way two years ago.
(In 2011, Cenovus Energy let on that output from two
of its in situ oilsands projects could meet the standard, which mandates that crude oil imported to the state have lower wells - to - wheels emissions than the average
of all crudes sold in the U.S.) «Yes, I
think that's feasible,» says George Hoberg, a political scientist at the University
of British Columbia who specializes in
environmental conflict.
«We would agree that Alberta's historic focus on maximizing oilsands production... rather than optimizing production on the highest quality ore may be having unnecessary
environmental impacts on things like greenhouse gas intensity and tailings production and lowering returns to Albertans as the owners
of the resource,» said Simon Dyer
of the Pembina Institute, a clean energy
think - tank.
Many
of the environmentalists who responded angrily to Steiner beseech readers to, as the Minneapolis non-profit wrote, «
think about «profits» a little more broadly» to include the job creation and
environmental benefits that recycling brings.
The bag - fee movement — driven by
environmental crusaders and corporate group -
think — un-tipped because it conflicted with the primacy
of consumer preferences.
In doing so, he laid the foundation for the new discipline
of enterprise design, successfully applying his design
thinking methodology to economic, cultural, governmental,
environmental, and social change for internationally celebrated designers, leading companies, and countries around the world.
I
think China finally caught on to the fact that it was pricing its rare earth minerals at the uneconomic low - cost margin
of extraction, not taking into account the
environmental clean up costs or the replacement costs for these basically irreplaceable rare metals.
A 2014 Washington Post-ABC News poll found that 85 percent
thought the pipeline would create a significant number
of jobs, while 47 percent
thought it would pose a significant
environmental risk.
Lighthizer is expected to try to nix another transnational court for investment disputes, and he has backing from a wide variety
of constitutional lawyers,
environmental and labor groups, and conservative
think tanks that say the special courts encroach on U.S. sovereignty.
For example, as the
environmental costs
of climate change rack up, planning for the future and
thinking about climate mitigation can genuinely help a company's bottom line.
The government and the oil and gas industry have spent lavishly to promote fossil fuel development, but a poll for the Canadian Association
of Petroleum Producers found that only 51 %
of us
think tar sands / oil sands development is worth the
environmental risk; 49 %
think it isn't.
This was driven in part by the rise
of public interest litigation —
think, for example,
of an
environmental group finding a third - party plaintiff to sue a company to stop an environmentally sensitive development project.
We need to
think about and incorporate this set
of current
environmental variables into planning our ascent / descent well before our current summit attempt is over.
In a Glass Lewis Proxy Talk held April 17, 2014, Anne Simpson
of CalPERS and Michael Garland
of the New York City Comptroller's Office discussed why they
think shareholders should vote against the re-election
of four Duke Energy Corporation directors for what they believe to be a failure
of the directors to fulfill their obligations
of risk oversight as members
of a committee overseeing health, safety, and
environmental compliance at the company.
Although she is not specifically addressing
environmental thought, this is an argument pressed by Caroline Walker Bynum in her recent and remarkable study, The Resurrection
of the Body in Western Christianity.
Nonetheless, the lines
of inquiry connected with the term — combined with fresh study
of biblical, patristic, and Orthodox
thought — hold high promise, I believe, for a constructive response to the concerns raised by today's
environmental philosophers.
On the other hand, the younger set takes their sexual cues from the resurrection (preferring not to
think about the so - called «order
of creation») while using Genesis to highlight their culture - making activities and their
environmental concerns.
To describe strip mines as environmentally devastating reflects a way
of thinking that logically requires one to regard the building
of dykes and reclaiming
of land in Holland as one
of the greatest
environmental crimes
of all time.
It has also had significant
environmental consequences — set aside climate change and, if nothing else,
think of industrial toxicity at the scale
of Lake Michigan's southwest shoreline, New Jersey's Chemical Coast, or the chemical plants and oil refineries immediately north
of Louisiana's State Capitol grounds in Baton Rouge, the long - term effects
of which remain unknown — and has prompted not only environmentalist discontent and backlash, but also a neo-pagan anthropology and cosmology in which nature itself is increasingly understood as sacred.
Hundreds
of people have been camping out and standing against the construction
of the pipeline, according to reports, because they
think the whole project poses a major
environmental threat to the Standing Rock Sioux tribe and its cultural sites.
Reducing the power
of governments to deal with
environmental issues by giving the WTO the power to overrule
environmental legislation
thought to restrain free trade hardly seems to be an expression
of rationality.
Perhaps because we can sometimes recycle it, we
think it's okay — or perhaps the reams
of environmental legislation lead us to
think the situation is taken care
of?
If we could count on corporations to
think of profits over the longrun, such as fifty years, there would be many opportunities to show that their selfinterest coincided with some
of the
environmental needs.
There are many reasons to
think ill
of s.ex, regardless
of virginity, e.g. disease,
environmental impact, social disruption
of promiscuity, etc., however, that was not my point.
An
environmental philosopher who has
thought much about the issue
of value in nature is Holmes Rolston, III (PGW).
«Conceptual Resources for
Environmental Ethics in Asian Traditions
of Thought: A Propaedeutic.»
They believe that
environmental ethics, rightly understood, points to an alternative discipline and an alternative way
of thinking in its own right: one that recognizes without equivocation the radical interconnectedness, and the equal value,
of all beings.
Although many
of those concerned for
environmental protection are
thinking about the natural world simply as it relates to human beings, the leaders
of the
environmental movement have been moved to perception and action by deeper changes.
[10] During the past ten or so years — primarily, I
think, in the wake
of environmental awareness — Western peoples have become newly conscious
of the devastations humanity is capable
of when it
thinks itself accountable to nothing beyond itself.
If you take a biology or
environmental science class, you can see the
thought God put into every aspect
of this world.
It may do itself in, sooner than most
of us
think, by massive
environmental pollution, and / or a nuclear holocaust.