I used to be something of a skeptic when it came to claims of «filter bubbles» — the sort
of epistemic closure that comes from only seeing material you agree with on social platforms.
Not exact matches
It's the context in which one can begin to make sense
of what has been called agnotology or
epistemic closure.
This sort
of cranky
epistemic closure is something to behold.
But denying the mechanism and origin
of the greenhouse effect itself is frivolous, representing
epistemic closure on a Dickmorrisian level.