[7] The possible conflict between the policy objectives of choice (or «self - determination») and
of equality of outcomes can lead to significant difficulty in interpreting statistics on program outcomes.
Not exact matches
To be clear — I am in favour
of equality of opportunity not
equality of outcome (sometimes called equity.
With
equality of outcome you are on your way to communism or an ideology that imitates communism.
«That the world may believe» is the
outcome of the manifestation
of holiness,
equality and unity modeled on the Holy Triunitarian structure,» the Metropolitan said.
In contrast, progressives seek to ensure «
equality and justice,» by guaranteeing these
outcomes through the enactment
of a series
of ««positive» rights like housing, food, and health care» that someone must provide — be it government or the private sector.
In return my 2 cents worth: I suspect Christ would have supported
equality of opportunity and not today's SJW's demands for
equality of outcome — teach a man to fish....
Because we know that
equality for women requires fathers to play an equal part in childrearing — indeed one
of the key policy
outcomes desired by many governments including in the UK (and central to the government's current proposals) is increased take - up
of parenting leave and pay by fathers.
I am * not * a proponent
of «
equality of outcomes».
The second question is related to the above: a «free market» baseline
of justice is about procedure - how
outcomes are arrived at, who is involved in making decisions, has rights over their own actions, how actions are agreed by parties etc. (or something like that) whereas
equality is an
outcome, that may or may not be achieved under various procedural arrangements, and may or may not be viewed as desirable by people who hold different views about what forms
of society - specifications over who has what rights to do what to who.
Miller 2.0 I think the important point on which it would be worth trying to build agreement is that almost all social democratic and liberal socialist conceptions
of equality and fairness do have scope for legitimate or merited differences
of outcome.
Almost no socialist theorist has argued for the straw man option
of absolute
equality of outcome.
Social mobility is actually a left - safe way
of talking about opportunity whereas in its heart the left wants
equality of outcome If there is opportunity the argument for state control becomes weaker and the role
of the left disappears and that is why it is commuited to maintaining poverty by rewarding idleness and creating an underclass
Those
of us who reject meritocracy do not necessarily demand total
equality of outcome, he said.
He's referring to a high court ruling which found Eric Pickles had been illegally discriminating against Traveller communities, breaching both human rights and
equality laws when deciding the
outcome of planning appeals.
Flanagan was more open to poking at Democrats, saying «we believe in
equality of opportunity, and I think that a lot
of our Democratic colleagues believe in the
equality of outcome.»
Because these are all
equality of outcome entities and not directly to do with equal oppurtunity, and are vitally important for the foundations
of a fair society.
The most fundamental difference between the two parties is that Republicans believe that
equality should mean
equality of opportunity, and Democrats believe that
equality should mean
equality of outcomes.
While NOM insists Democratic Assemblyman David Weprin's «yes» vote on gay marriage could cost him the race, HRC stresses that no matter who wins tonight (assuming it's not too close to immediately call, which is a distinct possibility, given the history
of past NY House specials) marriage
equality «did not play an influential, even modest, role in the
outcome.»
With echoes
of Tony Blair, he spoke
of «our belief in
equality of opportunity, as opposed to
equality of outcome» and he called Britain a «beacon in an uncertain world».
«Marriage
equality did not play an influential, even modest, role in the
outcome of this special election,» said Brian Ellner, a senior strategist for the Human Rights Campaign, which seeks
equality.
Socialists want to improve
equality of outcome for example by redistribution.
The
outcome of this case should spur Nigerians to always insist on the rule
of law, no matter the short term inconveniences, as it plays a crucial role in ensuring that political rights and civil liberties are safe and that the
equality and dignity
of all citizens are not at risk.»
Remember that
equality of outcome is never guaranteed because each individual will handle an opportunity differently.
17 The devastating
outcome of the traditional
equality rule is that
equality means that only people that are similar should be treated similarly.
As discussed above, tertiary education will empower refugees or asylum - seekers to achieve other dynamic development
outcomes, including poverty, development
of human dignity and personality, understanding tolerance and friendship, maintenance
of peace, effective participation in a free society, promotion
of gender
equality and respect
of environment.
With the study on
equality of opportunity, an
outcome of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Coleman developed his «first draft»
of those norms.
As the first words
of this book remind us, «Sweden has long been known for its pursuit
of equality — both
equality of opportunity and
equality of outcome.»
It also broadened public understanding
of the types
of interventions that will elevate the academic, social, and economic
outcomes of disadvantaged students in a manner that will give meaning to the notion
of equality of opportunity.
It focuses on
equality of outcomes rather than
equality of opportunity.
«It is easy to talk about
equality of opportunity, but the conversation is harder when we talk about
equality of outcomes.
There comes a time when we have to say it doesn't matter if people aren't ready for conversations about
equality of outcomes.»
Researchers» goal in 2018 is still to figure out educational interventions that would produce «
equality of outcomes» even if they can't point to one large - scale educational intervention that has done so.
They teach
equality of outcomes NOT
equality of opportunity — as a result, Ferguson, Baltimore, Detroit, blah, blah, blah.
This analytical report aims to demonstrate and illustrate how integrating gender
equality principles into REDD + (reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and the role
of conservation, sustainable management
of forests and enhancement
of forest carbon stocks in developing countries) results in improved sustainability
of climate and development
outcomes.
This lack
of modern energy acts as a major brake on efforts to reduce poverty, improve health, education, gender
equality and a range
of other positive economic and social
outcomes.
To me, accessibility is not just about which test is cheaper or whether the majority
of people who wish to take the test can afford it, but is about inclusiveness and whether everyone who wishes to take an admissions test will be treated in a manner that leads to an
equality of outcome.
The court stressed, however, that
equality of division was different to «greater
equality in the overall
outcome», the latter being the court's true goal.
The
Equality Impact Statements analyze provincial legislation using gender as a focal point to compare the intentions
of law - makers to meet standards
of fairness and
equality with the actual
outcomes of legislative and policy choice; the ultimate goal was to ensure that provincial legislation was having a positive impact on British Columbians.
Its goal is to achieve an
equality of outcome that prefers racialized persons and other minorities in gaining entrance into the profession and being promoted within it.
The report concludes that these figures, when compared to the level
of disadvantage faced, indicate that programs are insufficient to create
equality of outcome for Indigenous people.
When examining the micro and macro aspect
of early childhood educators, investing in early learning and gender
equality, the
outcome sometimes results in distinguishing amendments in policies and systems that better serve educators, children, families and society as a whole.
The Australian Psychological Society welcomes the
outcome of the Marriage Law postal survey and looks forward to prompt legislation establishing marriage
equality in Australia.
The conclusion
of the
equality of effects
of psychological therapies, however, showed a trend for a spin, which means that for the primary
outcome of interest the review more often states
equality despite inequality
of treatment effects (OR = 2.69 (0.86 to 8.41).
These reports highlight the need for all Australian governments, led by the federal government, to have clearly targeted, long - term plans which identify redressing Indigenous disadvantage as a national priority and which measure progress within an
equality framework; to be transparent about the
outcomes sought, with adequate performance indicators and benchmarks; and to ensure ongoing and independent monitoring and evaluation
of outcomes.
The most hurtful debate about marriage
equality critiques the ability
of same - sex couples to parent, claiming their children have poor psychological
outcomes.
Improving
outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people includes moving from a goal
of equality to equity; teaching about racism and unconscious bias, not just culture; and making explicit the deeper transformational work
of institutional decolonisation.
Alternatively, treating everyone differently, according to their needs and humanity is more likely to produce
equality of outcomes where everyone can access the game.
A more wide - ranging definition
of equality, which focuses on
outcomes (such as in terms
of equality of protection
of culture) rather than on inputs (such as by purely guaranteeing
equality of opportunities, as if there were a level playing field) is needed.
I call on all Australian governments to implement these recommendations in full, with all possible urgency, so that all Australians can enjoy
equality of opportunity and equal socioeconomic
outcomes, and we can all reach our full potential.
The first 5 years
of life are critical for the development
of language and cognitive skills.1 By kindergarten entry, steep social gradients in reading and math ability, with successively poorer
outcomes for children in families
of lower social class, are already apparent.2 — 4 Early cognitive ability is, in turn, predictive
of later school performance, educational attainment, and health in adulthood5 — 7 and may serve as a marker for the quality
of early brain development and a mechanism for the transmission
of future health inequalities.8 Early life represents a time period
of most
equality and yet, beginning with in utero conditions and extending through early childhood, a wide range
of socially stratified risk and protective factors may begin to place children on different trajectories
of cognitive development.9, 10