The Court's opinion in SCA Hygiene did note that an accused infringer can still defend against a claim of infringement based on the defense
of equitable estoppel.
For example, the Court noted that the «doctrine
of equitable estoppel provides protection against some of the problems that First Quality highlights, namely, unscrupulous patentees inducing potential targets of infringement suits to invest in the production of arguably infringing products.»
Not exact matches
While the jurisprudence tells us that proprietary
estoppel is no longer a «Procrustean bed constructed from some unalterable criteria» (see Idle - O Apartments Inc. at para. 23), the Court in Crabb nonetheless insisted the exercise
of equitable jurisdiction be rooted in identifiable principles.
This case does not involve any factors, such as inadvertent mistake or newly discovered evidence, that might, on
equitable grounds, relieve Otis from the application
of judicial
estoppel.
Edward has wide experience in litigation concerning trusts
of land, proprietary
estoppel,
equitable accounting, conveyancing disputes, boundary disputes, adverse possession claims, litigation over easements and restrictive covenants, legal and
equitable charges and mortgages, landlord and tenant disputes and possession actions.
Common law is still going strong in New Jersey: I can sue for the tort
of negligence, trespass and deceit, I can seek
equitable remedies like an injunction and
estoppel and I can also sue for breach
of contract.
Otherwise, you may be entitled to
equitable compensation and indemnification in respect
of the costs you have incurred if a claim
of promissory
estoppel is upheld, though the requirement for that is that the prospective defendant must have at least been able to reasonably foresee that you were to rely on their clear and unambiguous promise and that they unconscionably departed from their promise.
Other than the doctrine
of constructive trust, it is possible in certain circumstances to apply other
equitable principles such as proprietary
estoppel.
In its discussion, the Court also held that the
equitable tenet
of judicial
estoppel prevented Auday from pursuing the claim in her own name.
Equitable concepts such as proprietary
estoppel sit more comfortably within the realm
of domestic situations and for a claim
of an
equitable nature to succeed in a commercial context there would need to be very specific, exceptional and noteworthy circumstances to warrant such a decision.
1.29 Historically, the
equitable concern manifested through the use
of estoppel was characterized as being about «fraud», but today
estoppel is usually not thought to be based on such... [more]
1.29 Historically, the
equitable concern manifested through the use
of estoppel was characterized as being about «fraud», but today
estoppel is usually not thought to be based on such an extreme misleading
of one person by another.
1.30 Two
estoppel elements in particular are affected by such
equitable considerations: the requirement for detrimental reliance in establishing the need for
estoppel and the limited effect
of the
estoppel.
While the court agreed that it is possible the Purchaser could claim that the Seller was estopped from claiming title defects which would have prevented the closing when it had misrepresented the status
of the title in the purchase agreement, the court ruled that the bankruptcy court had failed to make sufficient findings
of fact in support
of this ruling and so reversed the
equitable estoppel ruling, sending the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.
Texas requires that a party claiming
equitable estoppel to prove that the other party knowingly made a false statement or concealed facts to a party who did not and could not know the falsity
of the statement and the statement was made with the knowledge that the party would rely on the statement to its detriment.