Since the Portuguese suspected the presence
of errors in the books, they all became casualties in the auto - da - fe programme launched by the Portuguese padroado authorities at the close of the 16th century and later.
Not exact matches
Ryanair was forced to cancel thousands
of bookings in September after what the airline said at the time was a pilot rostering
error.
He says 200,000 free downloads
of the
book (which was roundly criticized for plagiarism; a footnote transcription
error, Anderson says)
in two weeks prove the validity
of pricelessness.
People have been trying since the
books of the Bible were first written to find
errors or contradictions
in them.
Third, the
Book of Mormon abounds
in textual
errors, factual
errors, and outright plagiarisms from other works.
and bart shouldn't even be included because
of his disingenuous
book about the variants
of the BIble... (he never really gets down to the explicit details
of what they are... thus misleading people into thinking the Bible is full
of errors - for example... a verse may say «Jesus said to give all your possessions» whereas a VARIANT says «And HE says, give all your possesssions») an extremely low number
of variants
in the Bibel even change a thing...
Most
of the 350 - plus
books written by «creation scientists» consist
in large part
of discussions
of the supposed
errors of evolutionary teaching, reviewing vast amounts
of technical scientific data and theory, challenging this or that piece
of evidence, method
of dating or use
of data, while producing evidences and counterarguments
of their own
in favor
of a young earth, recent humanity, worldwide flood, etc..
He corrects an
error which he says «can be found
in every text
book of physics» (He is writing
in 1958: I wonder if it still appears.)
We do see God - inspired
error in the Bible, such as
in the
book of Job, so is it possible there might be other such inspired and inerrant
errors in Scripture?
Every writer
of every
book in the Bible was divinely inspired and guided
in what he wrote, so every statement on every subject
in the entire Bible is literally true, without
error.
They could point to differences
in terminology and word usage, «
errors»
of the text which «pre date» or «post date» the author, and why certain elements
of his
book show clear evidence
of redaction and editing.
And regardless
of what you believe about the violence
of God
in Scripture, these
books will present you with a new way
of looking at things so that you no longer have to choose between accepting that God is violent or writing off the Bible as hopelessly full
of error.
According to the Barna study, the percent
of engagement people have with the Bible — from being engaged (reading the Bible at least four times a week), friendly (engaged with the Bible less than four times a week), neutral (read the Bible once a month or less and see the Bible as the inspired word
of God, but acknowledge it can have some
errors) and skeptical (see the Bible as «just another
book of teachings written by men)-- has started to stabilize and return to its normal rates after the rate
of skepticism increased by 4 percent to 14 percent and the rate
of friendliness dropped 8 percent to 37 percent
in 2011.
They read the
book, found typographical
errors, and suggested hundreds
of changes to help clarify the argument and ideas (If you are interested
in joining a future Beta Reader team, I will announce openings through the email newsletter).
You have pointed out one
of the scientific
errors in your old
book - there are many, as well as purported moments
of: «Aw, Gee, how'd he know that?»
The entire
book of 1 John is engaged
in this idea about good and evil, light and darkness, truth and
error, and John is intent on showing his readers that based on who God is and what Jesus has done for all people, we can choose to live
in love, light, and righteousness, rather than abide
in hatred, darkness, and evil.
In a 2009 essay in the Chronicle of Higher Education on the fiftieth anniversary of Strunk and White's Elements of Style, Edinburgh professor Geoffrey Pullum isn't content to point out errors in that celebrated boo
In a 2009 essay
in the Chronicle of Higher Education on the fiftieth anniversary of Strunk and White's Elements of Style, Edinburgh professor Geoffrey Pullum isn't content to point out errors in that celebrated boo
in the Chronicle
of Higher Education on the fiftieth anniversary
of Strunk and White's Elements
of Style, Edinburgh professor Geoffrey Pullum isn't content to point out
errors in that celebrated boo
in that celebrated
book.
To say that the claims that are based off
of a
book were created after the
book was first written is just stupid (maybe your argument isn't what you typed and you made an
error in trying to convey your thoughts).
Repeatedly he argued that the introduction
of women priests, the new prayer
book and other changes
in the Episcopal Church had taken it out
of the mainstream
of Episcopalianism; that
in fact the schismatic group, by separating itself from all that «
error,» is the faithful remnant.
The first chapter
of that
book has too many
errors in it.
In February the Jesuit theologian Roger Haight, former professor at Weston Jesuit School of Theology in Cambridge, Massachusetts, received notification that the Vatican had found «serious doctrinal errors» in his 1999 book Jesus: Symbol of God (Orbis) and that he was forbidden to teach as a Catholic theologia
In February the Jesuit theologian Roger Haight, former professor at Weston Jesuit School
of Theology
in Cambridge, Massachusetts, received notification that the Vatican had found «serious doctrinal errors» in his 1999 book Jesus: Symbol of God (Orbis) and that he was forbidden to teach as a Catholic theologia
in Cambridge, Massachusetts, received notification that the Vatican had found «serious doctrinal
errors»
in his 1999 book Jesus: Symbol of God (Orbis) and that he was forbidden to teach as a Catholic theologia
in his 1999
book Jesus: Symbol
of God (Orbis) and that he was forbidden to teach as a Catholic theologian.
In a review of Sherwood Wirt's influential book The Social Conscience of an Evangelical in The Reformed Journal 18 (May - June 1968): 19, Daane argues that churches can make specific social and political announcements for three reasons: (1) Protestants are not committed to belief in an infallible church and therefore can risk erro
In a review
of Sherwood Wirt's influential
book The Social Conscience
of an Evangelical
in The Reformed Journal 18 (May - June 1968): 19, Daane argues that churches can make specific social and political announcements for three reasons: (1) Protestants are not committed to belief in an infallible church and therefore can risk erro
in The Reformed Journal 18 (May - June 1968): 19, Daane argues that churches can make specific social and political announcements for three reasons: (1) Protestants are not committed to belief
in an infallible church and therefore can risk erro
in an infallible church and therefore can risk
error.
I do like the progressive Christian stance as you describe it — that there may be
error in many
of the
books of the bible — but that people, even with our limited minds, can strive to see a more perfect vision than what was written.
You should have learned about what eth haa Adam means
in Genesis 1:27 which seems to me, that is what you perceive to be
in error, but then again, you need to cross reference the
books of the Bible.
John Cobb, Jr.
in his
book, A Christian Natural Theology, 1 makes this same
error in his discussion
of life after death as a part
of a chapter on the human soul.
But there were some major flaws
in the
book, not only with some logical
errors, but also with some misunderstandings
of Scripture, and a misunderstanding
of how and why the early church began to meet on Sunday rather than on Saturday as had been the custom among Jesus and His disciples.
But if, on the other hand, our theory should allow that a
book may well be a revelation
in spite
of errors and passions and deliberate human composition, if only it be a true record
of the inner experiences
of great - souled persons wrestling with the crises
of their fate, then the verdict would be much more favorable.
As I contend
in a forthcoming
book, Death on a Friday Afternoon, this falls far short
of an encounter with the God
of Israel who accepts defeat by our definition
of the game
in order to expose the
error of our definition.
No other subject on the curriculum would be allowed to get away with this inexcusable
error which insults children, not just since there is a basic mistake
of mathematics, but because no actual verifiable figures are provided — anything will do
in a
book about RE.
...
in the said
book you try by means
of various subterfuges to give the impression
of leaving it [Copernicanism] undecided and labeled as probable; this is still a very serious
error since there is no way an opinion declared and defined contrary to divine Scripture may be probable.
It is not possible to correct the countless
errors in Berke's review
of these two
books in a letter, but one thing must be said: Holocaust revisionism would not have grown as it has over the last decade if not for the fact that our position can withstand the scrutiny
of any fair - minded person.
The Quran and the
Book of Mormon are riddled with
error and
in cases fasle according to arcaeology and anthropoligy.
However, since we don't have any autographs
of Scripture, the hand
of man is involved, and there is not a copy
of any
book in the Bible without
errors, especially translations.
In the Bible
book of Numbers, for instance, the writer Moses admits his own serious
error for which he was severely reproved.
Later,
in his
book Radical Imperative: From Social Ethics to Theology, Bennett confessed his mistakes, and came to see that his view
of American foreign policy
in the 1940s and 1950s, a view that took American policies as manifestations and realizations
of the kingdom
of God, was gravely
in error.
Yes, its true — Christians can give «harmonizations» for every alleged
error and contradiction, but so can the Muslims for
errors in the Koran, and Mormons for
errors in the
Book of Mormon.
Al - Ghazali, the great mystical philosopher,
in his
book The Rescuer from
Error gives a vivid account
of the spiritual crisis he endured until, by the mercy
of God, his way was enlightened and he regained the power to guide himself to the truth.
Don't take off, leave a magic
book of violence, science
errors and sillyness threatening to kill everyone who does not have faith
in you, like that is true morality..
In The Stand, King's magnum opus — or at least his best book, since he would probably give the magnum - opus nod to his bloated, interminable seven - volume Dark Tower saga — the survivors of a global superflu face off in an apocalyptic battle royale, but the superflu itself is an entirely human creation, a dark thing conjured up by the just - doing - our - job good men in the U.S. military and released into the world by simple human erro
In The Stand, King's magnum opus — or at least his best
book, since he would probably give the magnum - opus nod to his bloated, interminable seven - volume Dark Tower saga — the survivors
of a global superflu face off
in an apocalyptic battle royale, but the superflu itself is an entirely human creation, a dark thing conjured up by the just - doing - our - job good men in the U.S. military and released into the world by simple human erro
in an apocalyptic battle royale, but the superflu itself is an entirely human creation, a dark thing conjured up by the just - doing - our - job good men
in the U.S. military and released into the world by simple human erro
in the U.S. military and released into the world by simple human
error.
I have some minor moans about
errors, which just aren't quite forgiveable
in what is not a first edition
of the
book.
For those not familiar with academic debates, the impression could be given that West's work contains serious
errors, when,
in fact, his
books have received imprimaturs and the endorsement
of trusted figures.
At the same time, it is to be borne
in mind that «[since] everything asserted by the inspired authors or sacred writers must be held to be asserted by the Holy Spirit, it follows that the
books of Scripture must be acknowledged as teaching solidly, faithfully and without
error that truth which God wanted put into sacred writings for the sake
of salvation» (DV, 11).
God inspired inerrant
error because at the end
of the
book, or at least,
in the Gospels, He wants to show us Who He really is and how He works
in this world.
Then Joseph quickly learned this ancient script written on this gold tablets while the angel patiently waits, translating everything directly to American English the
Book of Mormon
in the 1800's without a single
error)
Even though the early press runs
of the first
book, Top Secret Recipes, excluded buttermilk
in this recipe — a very important ingredient if you really want pourable batter — many figured out the missing ingredient on their own and the
error was quickly corrected
in later copies.
But it was already
in its 3rd moments after the
book came out and we became aware
of the
error.
Of course, as they say
in books — all
errors are my responsibility.
King and Crewe are distinguished political scientists whose aim
in writing this
book was not just to produce a «laundry list»
of recent government project
errors, but to analyse why they happened, commonality
of the blunders and what, if anything, can be done to prevent or ameliorate them.
I have also developed the amazing skill
of being able to detect the
errors of fact, clerical
errors, omissions and unlawful entries
in any assessment roll
book in the State
of New York.
To pass the time
in his Jerusalem hotel room, he picked up a copy
of Descartes»
Error, neuroscientist Antonio Damasio's pioneering
book about emotion
in the brain.