How do you know someone is believing in the «right» Jesus by simply telling the He's the guarantor
of eternal life if you believe on him?
What are our images
of eternal life if not ways of picturing a wider sphere of existence, a more generous personal life, less closed in upon ourselves, less fearful and grasping, more real in every respect?
Yeah, so you're an average American «feeling» the presence of a middle - eastern sky god giving you love and the promise
of eternal life if you blindly belief he «sacrificed» his son so he could resurrect himself to save his creation from an eternal damnation he created.
Doesn't that run counter to the religious «promise»
of eternal life if only you humble yourself to the service of god «X»?
So based on this idea about being able to give up the gift
of eternal life if we want to, is there a Scripture reference for that?
How can one consider a christian of another denomination is not recognized or brought to the fullness
of the eternal life if they are not in total union with the Catholic Faith.
Not exact matches
Are you really happy with your head in the sand,
living in a myth
of fear that
if you look elsewhere you risk
eternal flames?
But
if we dare to say «we found Him» — then, our «religion» should be enriching all people, giving to all people, open to all people, speaking
of eternal life, and not condemning any.
Sure, the fairy tale
of eternal life would be desirable
if it were even remotely possible.
If eternal life is the main reason you've accepted Christ into your
life, then, as so many others have, you have missed the point
of Christianity.
What makes this especially puzzling is the realization that the discussion is usually within the context
of the Christian construct
of heaven and
eternal life, concepts that would be desired by most, even
if only hypothetically.
If that is true
of the gospel's most counterintuitive claim — that it is through the unjust death
of a just man that the world is redeemed — it is also true
of his claim to be the truth that is the way to authentic human
life, and to
eternal life.
You sound like a very selfish child, and I doubt you would even be a christian
if not for the promise
of eternal life.
If the gospel is not preached with conviction — the convictions that humanity is in need
of salvation and that Jesus is the Savior who liberates us into the fullness
of our humanity and gives us
eternal life — then the gospel will not be believed.
Wherefore,
if ye shall press forward, feasting upon the word
of Christ, and endure to the end, behold, thus saith the Father: Ye shall have
eternal life... there is none other way nor name given under heaven whereby man can be saved in the kingdom
of God.»
And
if He comes and your not ready, you will be left too endure the wrath
of the
Living God, and in the world to come
eternal separation from God.
And
if we believe the promise,
if we believe what God has said,
if we believe in Jesus for
eternal life, then we have received the free gift
of grace.
Of course,
if you have not yet believed in Jesus for
eternal life, why put it off any longer?
Craig that was exactly my understanding however
if we believe that in that traditional sense a person could lose there
eternal life by there actions by not walking in the Lord which i do nt think is right as
eternal life is a free gift from God not based on works.Jeremys definition is that we are saved by faith in Jesus Christ to
eternal life.I believe the term salvation has the meaning to be saved not necesarily to
eternal life but saved from ourselves Christ gives us the power to be transformed into his likeness or to be Christ like.In the
eternal picture our actions determine how we are rewarded from God although its not the motivation
of the reward but because we love the Lord.regards brent
If you confuse purification gospel truths with the presentation truth, then you might think it is necessary for a person to repent
of their sin or believe in the future judgments in order to receive
eternal life.
They teach that
if you have patterns
of habitual sin in your
life, you have good reason to question whether or not you actually have
eternal life.
The fourth Gospel reports Jesus» saying, «
If you love me, you will keep my commandments,» and «He who believes in the Son has
eternal life; he who does not obey the Son shall not see
life, but the wrath
of God rests upon him.»
Yet what
if the ultimate goal
of all things is redemption and
eternal life?
But
if this is true, then how is
eternal life by faith alone and not
of works?
The death
of Christ is
of no value to you
if you don't believe in Jesus for
eternal life.
So often, it seems that such is the presentation
of the Good News —
if you will conform outwardly to this shape, this liturgy, this behavior... then... you will have
eternal life.
Since it is about the election and rejection
of Israel for God's purposes, many believe that Romans 9 teaches that even after we receive
eternal life,
if we fail to
live according to God's purposes, we either lose our
eternal life or we prove we never had it in the first place.
I don't disagree (
if I am understanding you correctly), but we must make sure we understand the difference between how to receive
eternal life (believe in Jesus Christ alone for it), and the logical and theological foundations for that truth (deity
of Jesus, death and resurrection
of Jesus, sinfulness
of humanity, etc., etc., etc.).
To the best
of my understanding, the deposit
of faith clearly affirms the following: that God desires the salvation
of all and offers the real possibility
of salvation to all; the offer can be accepted or rejected and,
if accepted by faith, such faith is recognized as the gift
of God;
if the offer is knowingly, freely, and definitively rejected, even at the very last moment
of life, one goes to hell, which is
eternal; but the deposit
of faith does not tell us clearly that anyone is in fact eternally damned.
Every knee shall bow to him in the end but
if you use your free will to accept him now, you can receive the gift
of eternal life.
(E.g., They say things like «Jesus did his 99 %, but I must do my 1 %» or «I'm saved now, but
if I sin later, I won't be saved any more» or «I accepted the gift
of eternal life, but I can give it back
if I don't abide.»)
If I am to be convinced that belief in the death and resurrection
of Jesus are necessary today to receive
eternal life, those are the questions I need answered.
If a person must believe in the death and resurrection
of Jesus, must they believe that Jesus rose in a glorified,
eternal, incorruptible body, and that He went on to ascend into heaven, or can they believe that He went on to
live, grow old, and die again
of old age like the others who were resurrected in Scripture?
If they believe that Jesus Christ died on the cross for the sins of all mankind, and if they believe that three days after his death, Jesus Christ rose from the dead and if they believe all of these things, but don't believe in Jesus for eternal life, that person is not save
If they believe that Jesus Christ died on the cross for the sins
of all mankind, and
if they believe that three days after his death, Jesus Christ rose from the dead and if they believe all of these things, but don't believe in Jesus for eternal life, that person is not save
if they believe that three days after his death, Jesus Christ rose from the dead and
if they believe all of these things, but don't believe in Jesus for eternal life, that person is not save
if they believe all
of these things, but don't believe in Jesus for
eternal life, that person is not saved.
All people have the ability to respond to the light
of revelation that they have received, and
if people respond, God has obligated Himself to make sure that they receive more light so that they too may believe in Jesus for
eternal life.
If we can understand how Jewish people were saved prior to the death and resurrection
of Jesus, then we can begin to answer how other people around the world may be able to receive
eternal life before they have heard about Jesus.
Also, I should say that it seemingly puts Jesus is the company
of other great philosophical and religious teachers who essentially say the same sorts
of things, in their own contexts and in their own times as to how to find «
eternal life» a phrase I think speaks
of a qualitative type
of life, a flourishing,
if you will, both now and after death.
You can believe all
of those things about Jesus and God, which are good things to believe, but
if you don't believe in Jesus for
eternal life, none
of it matters.
No, it is the serious question,
of what each man really is according to his
eternal vocation, so that he himself shall be conscious that he is following it; and what is even more serious, to ask it as
if he were considering his
life before God.
But
if the Book
of Life contains the names of people who have eternal life, then when Revelation 3:5 talks about blotting someone's name out of the book of life, does this mean it is possible to lose eternal l
Life contains the names
of people who have
eternal life, then when Revelation 3:5 talks about blotting someone's name out of the book of life, does this mean it is possible to lose eternal l
life, then when Revelation 3:5 talks about blotting someone's name out
of the book
of life, does this mean it is possible to lose eternal l
life, does this mean it is possible to lose
eternal lifelife?
If you do not live in some out - of - the - way place in the world, if you live in a populous city, and you direct your attention outwards, sympathetically engrossing yourself in the people and in what is going on, do you remember each time you throw yourself in this way into the world around you, that in this relation, you relate yourself to yourself as an individual with eternal responsibilit
If you do not
live in some out -
of - the - way place in the world,
if you live in a populous city, and you direct your attention outwards, sympathetically engrossing yourself in the people and in what is going on, do you remember each time you throw yourself in this way into the world around you, that in this relation, you relate yourself to yourself as an individual with eternal responsibilit
if you
live in a populous city, and you direct your attention outwards, sympathetically engrossing yourself in the people and in what is going on, do you remember each time you throw yourself in this way into the world around you, that in this relation, you relate yourself to yourself as an individual with
eternal responsibility?
If they are true believers and not riding some particular hobby horse they must surely say that everything has remained the same that is really necessary for
life as well as for death: the crucified and risen Christ, his grace, baptism, the true body and blood
of the Lord in the Eucharist, the forgiveness
of sins, the expectation
of eternal life, the ancient dogma binding on all, the one commandment
of the love
of God and our neighbour.
So
if one person is thinking only about the parts
of the gospel that tell a person how to go to heaven when they die or receive
eternal life (faith alone in Christ alone), while another person is thinking about the parts
of the gospel which tell followers
of Jesus how to
live on this earth (discipleship, obedience, faithful
living), but both persons keep using the term «gospel,» the argument quickly becomes quite messy.
But we can really do this only
if we slowly begin to believe from the very centre
of our heart in God, in Jesus Christ, in his grace, and in
eternal life.
But
if we unreservedly believe in God, accepting our responsibility to him and hoping in
eternal life, this faith will also help us to bear the narrowness and boredom
of our
life, which has today become worse rather than better.
If you have received this grace through repentance
of sin, you have an
eternal faith relationship with The Lord Christ Jesus, He dwells in you, you die to self, and it is Christ that
lives in you, therefore your works are
of Christ, and this is an ongoing, daily process.
If he believes that God is at the beginning as well as at the end, the Alpha as well as the Omega; if his hope for the future arises out of his faith in God's eternal presence; it is because he discerns the manner of God's presence and the way of his working in the strange person of Jesus of Nazareth, in his life and teaching, and not least in the bitter and apparently senseless tragedy of his deat
If he believes that God is at the beginning as well as at the end, the Alpha as well as the Omega;
if his hope for the future arises out of his faith in God's eternal presence; it is because he discerns the manner of God's presence and the way of his working in the strange person of Jesus of Nazareth, in his life and teaching, and not least in the bitter and apparently senseless tragedy of his deat
if his hope for the future arises out
of his faith in God's
eternal presence; it is because he discerns the manner
of God's presence and the way
of his working in the strange person
of Jesus
of Nazareth, in his
life and teaching, and not least in the bitter and apparently senseless tragedy
of his death.
We will look at this verse in more detail when we discuss the Calvinistic idea
of Limited Atonement, but for now, it is enough to note that even
if the whole world lies under the control
of the wicked one, Jesus has done what is necessary to liberate the whole world from the evil one so that they can respond to the gospel and believe in Jesus for
eternal life (cf. 1 John 5:7 - 13).
So now, the author
of Hebrews says,
if these Hebrew Christians return to the sacrificial system, then there is not sacrifice there which can offer forgiveness
of sins or
eternal life.
The ten people who already have
eternal life and who know the basics
of the faith so they can read the Bible and learn to follow Jesus on their own, or the ten people who are standing with one foot in hell, are wrapped in the chains
of the devil, and are pleading and praying to God,
if He is out there, to send help in their time
of need?