We POINT men SPECIFICALLY to FAITH in Christ in His PROMISE, which is a guarantee
of eternal security to all who merely take Him at His word for it.
If we were to take the time to study the entire book, as I hope to do someday, we would discover that the book of Hebrews teaches the doctrine
of eternal security more than many other books of the Bible!
Quite to the contrary, there are numerous reasons to believe and teach the biblical truth
of eternal security, all of which I cover in my online course.
But I noticed they take the Free Grace view
of eternal security, and so I was quite impressed with them.
And I understand why they want to do this — for the sake of the unity of the church — but I think that if we lose or sidestep the truths
of eternal security and assurance of salvation, then we have pretty much lost most of the gospel — we have pretty much lost the battle for the truth of the Gospel.
Pentecostals, being rooted or influenced from a Wesleyan / Holiness background, also tend to reject the doctrine
of eternal security, a doctrine central to many Mainline and Evangelical denominations.
It is a tragic paradox, and indeed a travesty, of Christianity that it has so often been proclaimed to men as a way to save themselves and to reach a haven
of eternal security.
They are far too late to the party to play the role of an onramp to the chain
of eternal security given that foreknowledge and predestination long precede it, being before the foundation of the world.
The logical extension
of eternal security is that people who give themselves over to evil must be accepted into heaven.
Because of all of this, it has been argued, and I would agree, that the issue
of eternal security may well be the most hotly debated and theologically divisive issue in the church today.
In other words, a lack
of eternal security leads to legalism.
Music styles might possibly be in first place, but if so, the issue
of eternal security is not far behind.
The foundation
of eternal security is an understanding of the matchless grace of God.
Read my responses to Craig above and I hope you will at least caution yourself and others to not place blind faith in the doctrine
of eternal security.
Not exact matches
I do believe in
eternal security, so I would say that although we are citizens
of the Kingdom
of God through faith in Jesus, we can still live according to some
of the rules (and consequences)
of the Kingdom
of Darkness.
We can hold to
eternal security while still affirming that most verses that talk about «salvation» affirm a conditional deliverance from some sort
of temporal and physical calamity.
When you are offered the choice
of either being Arminian (Lose your salvation) or Calvinist (Sovereignty
of God and
Eternal Security) it is a no - brainer.
But a strong, Biblical understanding
of God's grace, a grace that gives us everything for free, a grace that is not earned, not worked for, and can not be lost or destroyed, a grace that covers over all our sins, this kind
of grace leads to one thing —
eternal security.
Quite the contrary, I am convinced that when Scripture is studied in its various contexts,
eternal security is the clear teaching
of the Bible.
One
of the basic things we must understand is that
eternal security does not depend on us, but on God.
Many don't really care what kind
of preaching a pastor does, they only care whether he teaches
eternal security or not.
God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Acts 16:31,
eternal life,
eternal security, everlasting life, rewards, salvation, saved, Theology
of Salvation
And it is my conviction, it is my observation that those who believe in
eternal security move a lot faster down the road
of discipleship than those who are constantly afraid
of making mistakes.
I think that much
of the confusion about the
security of eternal life comes from this simple misunderstanding.
After I tell some Christians that I believe that God foreknows those whom He can convince / persuade to make a free will decision to accept Christ as their savior and that I believe in
eternal security of the believer, they say that God can only eternally secure a believer if God removes the person's free will capacity to accept or reject Christ after the person accepts Christ as his savior.
Much
of what the west has long taken for granted is now disappearing: the
security provided by Christendom; the Christian way
of interpreting reality; the confidence that the Christian path leads to
eternal salvation; and the belief that Christian doctrine embodies the essential and unchangeable truths by which to live.
Eternal security (the belief that a person can not lose his or her salvation) is rejected, since Mormon salvation is based in large part on acts
of obedience after an initial faith experience.
Some
of you will hit me with a bunch
of scripture later about apostasy and scripture that is against
eternal security.
He saved me from my sins... gave me peace, joy and
security of Eternal life.
I divorced and remarried then both me and my husband became Christians, I was fine with this as we were not Christians before we got remarried, but i commited adultery with my exhusband and although i know God has forgiven me and my husband has forgiven me it has has an effect on my spirit, i don't feel the same since i commted adultery, i feel unclean and my 100 %
security of eternal salvation isn't there now.
You need to understand the fact that the fear
of having committed the unpardonable sin is the manifestation
of your concern about your salvation, about your
eternal security, about
eternal life.
1) that
eternal life given on the basis
of faith alone, in Christ alone, apart from works; 2) that
eternal security is part
of the gift
of eternal life; 3) that assurance
of salvation is through faith in Christ's promise
of eternal life, and not by looking at one's own works 4) Christians can apostatize in this life, and are still eternally secure 5)
eternal rewards are earned by faithful works, and lost by unfaithfulness 6) unlimited atonement 7) free - will to respond to God's drawing or not
God is One Verse, Redeeming Scripture, Redeeming Theology, z Bible & Theology Topics: book
of life, book
of the living,
eternal life,
eternal security, gospel, gospel dictionary, Lambs book
of life, revelation 3:5
A fervently religious child, with a pension for impromptu lectures to classmates about substitutionary atonement and
eternal security, this news came as a bit
of blow, but I supposed I could find my calling elsewhere.
God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: Books by Jeremy Myers, Calvinism,
eternal security, James 2, Once Saved Always Saved, salvation, saved, Theology
of Salvation
God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: assurance, Bible and Theology Questions,
eternal life,
eternal security, kingdom
of god, lose salvation, Theology
of Salvation
«
Eternal security,» the claim «once saved, always saved,» does not involve the loss
of ability to sin.
Eternal security is the confidence that, no matter how much the waves
of earthly temptation toss our bark, we shall reach the harbor.
... love places the
eternal security and permanent welfare
of the object
of love above any transitory or temporary comfort or present pleasure down her upon this earth.
Being complete with historically accurate facts, a fundamentalist friendly framework, tongue - in - cheek humor, and many twists
of irony, this small set
of condensed Biblically faith - based narratives is sure to warm your heart and give you the
eternal security for which you have always longed but did not know it yet because you are blinded by Satan.
Yet
of two things the Christian can be confident: that the way
of brotherhood and mutual understanding is God's way, which if followed leads to justice,
security, and peace; and that if man does end his collective life upon earth, God will still reign in his
eternal Kingdom.
God is Uncategorized Bible & Theology Topics: assurance, Bible Study, book
of life, book
of the living,
eternal security, revelation 3:5, Theology
of Salvation, Theology
of the End Times
This sort
of oversight is present in the chapters on the providence
of God, salvation,
eternal security, and hell, just to name a few.
In our day and age, the question about
eternal security and the assurance
of salvation is sometimes seen as a divisive issue.
Just because I believe in the
eternal security of the believer doesn't make me a Calvinist and just because I don't believe God chose or elected who would be saved doesn't make me an Arminian or any combo
of the two.
I am absolutely confident in my
eternal security because
of what Jesus did for me on the cross.
Since many Christians think that these two terms are synonymous, they don't really see much
of a difference between
eternal security and «once saved, always saved.»
One's
eternal security is tied to caring for «the least
of these,» whoever they are.
I've read books on
eternal security, I'm not talking about that, but rather, I'm talking about your definition
of «saved» as deliverance.
I have my own thoughts about the subject which I believe is the only way to conjoin the free Gift
of God,
eternal security, works, obedience, faith, etc..