Sentences with phrase «of eternal universes»

Not only could this create the future of internet and blockchain based gaming, but by enabling the creation of eternal universes that see multi-game spanning DApps and collectible provably scarce items, Loom Network could be creating what will be an immense financial incentive to both develop and play in these new universes.

In his Physics, he developed a philosophy of nature (which he called second philosophy) that was a combination of metaphysics as well as empirical science, e.g. his geo - centric model of an eternal universe.

Not exact matches

«When we trace the evolution of our universe backwards in time, at some point we arrive at the threshold of eternal inflation, where our familiar notion of time ceases to have any meaning,» Hertog told Cambridge.

«The usual theory of eternal inflation predicts that globally our universe is like an infinite fractal, with a mosaic of different pocket universes, separated by an inflating ocean,» Hawking said in an interview last fall, according to the University of Cambridge.

Hertog told Cambridge that the physics that would account for infinite parallel universes break down when applied to the theory of eternal inflation.

@Chad «the really fascinating aspect of Alexander Vilenkin Kinematic Incompleteness Theorem (the Borde Guth Vilenkin Theorem) is that not only demonstrates that OUR universe had a beginning, but it goes further to demonstrate that ANY universe (Multi-verse, Eternal Inflation, Cyclic Evolution, and Static Seed (Emergent Universe), etc.) that has a Hubble expansion greater than zero had a beginning.»

It takes more faith to believe in a universe evolving from nothing or from eternal matter than to believe in a loving Creator, existing outside the limit of time, who gave us this specially designed & tuned universe to explore and to learn about caring for one another even through the midst of difficult experiences.

Einstein revolutionized our understanding of space and time, but he was shackled to the notion of a static eternal universe, «obvious» to people of that time.

People have shown to be too smart to fall for the ridiculous notion that A. the universe is either eternal or came from nothing B. Morality is a figment of our imagination C. And also, despite the aforementioned, religion is objectively immoral.

The end result in Atheism is either death or eternal mortality, conquering the universe and knowing everything as a part of a hive - mind.

1) nothing in this physical universe is the reason for its own existence 2) A causal chain exists 3) no causal chain is of infinite length 4) Only the supernatural (that which exists outside of physical reality) can be the ultimate cause of all physical reality 5) That supernatural cause could not itself have a cause, because infinite causal chains do not exist 6) This eternal, supernatural enti.ty we call, God.

The scientific evidence in support of God's existence lies in the evidence that the universe is not eternal and that it is unscientific for something with a beginning to be uncaused.

But to believe the universe is eternal is inconsistent with the laws of thermodynamics, namely that disorder tends to increase with time.

Our lives are so short compared to the age of the universe, we need an eternal purpose to give our lives meaning... So, the only way I see to do that is to serve the purpose of something eternal, namely God.

You are right that God is eternal, having had no beginning (this being incomprehensible by us) and is the Creator of the universe and all life.

If God is eternal, then the universe is eternal, even if at some point the universe was composed of only God.

If you were the creator of a universe 100 billion light years in diameter, that probably is also multi-dimensional as well as eternal, would you hang around trying to impress a group of arrogant primates who a milli - second ago were brachiating among the tress of Africa?

(Matt 5:3) The universe and all life is evidence that someone who is surpassingly greater than us exists and we as humans are an essential part of his «eternal purpose».

What religion offers: — The opportunity to avoid eternal punishment for not worshiping / believing in my god (not worried enough to care)-- An explanation for the universe and why we are here (I'll take the knowledge gained from the application of the scientific method, but thanks)-- Living forever in heavenly bliss (I am content with this life)-- The opportunity to divide humanity based upon different belief systems (There is enough dividing us already)-- Purpose, a code of ethics, and fulfillment (I have that already, without religion)-- Develop a personal relationship with god (I've never seen or heard from any gods nor have I seen any independantly verified scientifically collected peer reviewed proof.

As Whitehead says,» «Change» is the description of the adventures of eternal objects in the evolving universe of actual things» (PR 59 / 92).

In the Hebrew - Christian tradition the presupposition is that the universe does contain satisfaction for man's highest desires, that those who hunger and thirst after righteousness are blessed and shall be filled, that there is living bread and water for the spirit, not, in a negative peace of renounced desire but in the positive achievement of triumphant personality, both here and in an eternal kingdom of souls.

The Son is the eternal Logos who holds the patterns of all of life, and these patterns form the rational structure to the universe and the human mind itself.

However, Whitehead rejects the mythical sense of creation in which God is an eternal Being who suddenly starts the time - clocks by an act of creating the material universe, including man.

The order and harmony of the universe indicate that there is a «givenness» of relevant eternal objects for each actual occasion in the temporal process.

It could still be a steady state universe which actually doesn't explode out of nothing and then expand in an accelerated manner into an eternal cold and dark void.

Since the physical universe had a beginning, 1) it is not eternal, and 2) it's origins had to be supernatural (since it was outside of physical reality

This not about denying the existence of other universes, this stating that matter can not be infinite / eternal.

When you examine the nature of that Cause, you see that it must be outside the universe's beginning, realm and time, and is not subject to it, that is non-temporal — without beginning nor end, hence NON-CHANGING, hence Eternal, hence UNCAUSED, hence Metaphysical, hence «First Cause.»

I find it rather comical that one argues that there can not be an eternal being who created our universe, yet there can be an infinite amount of universes created from nothing.

Your ignorance of what cosmology says about the universe and your ignorance of the evil of your bible will not buy you an eternal life.

The ultimate elements of the universe, thus appropriated, are the already - constituted actual entities, and the eternal objects.

The eternal universe may be in an infinite cycle of expansion outward until gravity finally overcomes it and it all compresses back together to a point where it Big Bangs again...

Avoiding infinite regress, there couldn't be an infinite series of causes for our physical universe, so whatever this cause was, it was eternal and un-caused.

The idea that the universe is an eternal cycle of big bangs and big crunches has been discredited for many years now, (much to the chagrin of rejectors of God).

But can we agree on the last statement of the quoted paragraph regarding man — the idea that «in him as a person all the moral ends of the universe and all the movement of God's eternal purpose find meaning»?

«Yet in the whole of the universe there is no force that is either intelligent or eternal, and we must therefore assume that behind this force there is a conscious, intelligent Mind or Spirit.

As for me, I can't believe in an human - like being that designed and jump - started the universe 13.8 billion years ago and set aside a planet for His special favorite creations, so He'd have someone to keep Him company and sing songs praising Him, then gave Bronze Age hermits a book of His orders to mankind that includes «thou shalt not round thy head nor cut thy beard» on penalty of eternal suffering... just CA N'T, any more than I can force myself to believe the world rests on the back of giant turtle.

«Say what you will about God, there is not a shovel big enough to dig yourself out of the whole that you dug for yourself when you said: «Not a single thing in the entire universe can claim eternal life» In that one statement, you are admitting that the universe is not eternal.

My point is that we know so very little about our universe that I can say «at the moment nothing we know of is eternal» while at the same time understanding that the universe could be like that electron and wink in and out of existence in some constant renewal, from singularity to singularity and back again, but because we only see a tiny fragment of the process we can only make sloppy assumptions as to the mechanics involved.

HotAirAce - This is because Energy which is eternal was Converted (transpose) to Matter which is the make up of our universe and the only first cause that we have evidence for, to date.

That is impossible, because it would have to exist before it existed to create itself... (either that, or he's assuming that the universe is eternal — but given that our universe demonstrates countless signs of mutability, then it isn't eternal) Also, we have «something» now, and once you have «something,» it is impossible to have «nothing.»

It is «the eternal activity,» «the underlying energy of realisation,» Nothing escapes it; the universe consists entirely of its creatures, its individualized embodiments.

William James writes in «The Will to Believe»: «The more perfect and more eternal aspect of the universe is represented in our religions as having personal form.

You don't know whether it is real big or real small, whether it even has awareness of its offshoot (the universe), whether it has wants and needs and demands, that it has love and hate, benevolence and wrath, the power to reward eternal happiness.

Unlike the Christian god that wouldn't ever change his mind or doctrine... except for cursing the world for eating an apple... except for telling Abraham to sacrifice his son, but then stopping him... and except for killing nearly all life on Earth and then because of the guilt says I'll never to do that ever again - in exactly that way... and except for deciding that 2 of himself (Father and Spirit) weren't enough any more, and creating / fathering / spiriting as Son... and except for forgiving all sin, when «In the beginning» he had cursed the universe for the eating of an apple, by having his creation torture and kill his only begotten Son... and except for having to repeat himself about the unchanging eternal rules, to Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Saul / Paul, Mohammed, Joseph Smith, Bahá «u «lláh, David Koresh, and a whole host of others... and except for... and except for...

As «the Eternal Object incarnate,» Christ is the «source of all revelation,» the «goal towards which the universe as a developing system of events had previously moved,» and the «starting point from which all its subsequent history flows.»

Personality, the most valuable thing in the universe, revealing the real nature of the Creative Power and the ultimate meaning of creation, the only eternal element in a world of change, the one thing worth investing in, and in terms of service to which all else must be judged — that is the essential Christian creed [As I See Religion (Harper & Brothers, 1932), P. 44].

The solution of the eternal recurrence depends essentially on Nietzsche's conception of the external, independent relation of time to becoming and willing, coupled with his notion of time as infinite and the becoming universe as finite (TSZ 178).

«What we must fight for is to safeguard the existence and the reproduction of our race... so that our people may mature for the fulfillment of the mission allotted it by the creator of the universe... Peoples that bastardize themselves, or let themselves be bastardized, sin against the will of eternal Providence.»

So, from your viewpoint, absolutely nothing can be dismissed as the possible start point of the universe, but if the universe is eternal, it would have no scientific or supernatural start point.