Hundreds
of evangelical scholars are completing specialized doctorates to prepare for teaching careers.
Just as the nature of Christ as God and man challenged the full faculties of the faith and reason of Augustine and the Church Fathers, so the nature of Scripture as the Word of God and the word of human authors challenges the full faculties of the faith and reason
of evangelical scholars and missionaries today.
Not exact matches
Should add most that you accept since there are tons
of orthodox and catholic and
evangelical Christian
scholars that you clearly have not read or considered.
But in recent years I have come to appreciate the fact that many promising younger
evangelical scholars got their start in a serious commitment to the life
of the mind by responding positively to the LaHaye - type call to intellectual warfare.
Ross offers a defense
of evangelical liturgical practices (perhaps better described as «norms,» actually) by putting Catholic
scholar Aidan Kavanagh into conversation with Anglican theologian John Webster.
In recent decades pundits and some
scholars have made much
of the post-WWII
evangelical resurgence, coupled with a precipitous post-1965 mainline decline.
The Methodist
scholar Cyril Eastwood rightly lamented the distortion
of this
evangelical imperative: «The common error that the phrase «priesthood
of believers» is synonymous with «private judgment» is most unfortunate and is certainly a misrepresentation.
The
scholar I have found most associated with the claim in more recent
Evangelical literature is Anthony Hoekema, an irenic Reformed
scholar to be sure, but one who nevertheless has said that «it has been the almost unanimous conviction
of the mainline Protestant churches that these miraculous gifts ceased at the close
of the Apostolic Age.»
For some years now, a raft
of distinguished
scholars (Heiko Oberman, David Yeago in this journal, Bruce Marshall, Christine Helmer, and Paul Hinlicky) have been showing how Catholic the real Luther was» contrary to the portrait
of Luther used for polemical purposes by too many
evangelicals and even Lutherans.
Olson knows very well how difficult it is to maintain the coherence
of the movement when
evangelical pastors and
scholars so love a good debate.
More than ever,
evangelical scholars should not abandon the identity as hopelessly marred by Trumpism, but, in the words
of an
evangelical theologian who did this well, revision evangelicalism and renew the center.
The first is relatively uncontroversial to most believers except, perhaps, to
evangelical philosophers and fundamentalists
of various types — namely, that laypeople are in no position to adjudicate disputes among experts in New Testament scholarship because the
scholars have an expertise in languages and ancient history that laypeople lack.
Agnostic
scholar Katharine Wilkinson looks at the legacy
of the
Evangelical Climate Initiative.
I've heard powerful, encouraging things from stay - at - home moms, from conservative
evangelicals, from biblical
scholars, from plenty
of guys, even from People Magazine.
A second lesson that Lindbeck offers
evangelicals is a model for understanding how the biblical virtues should manifest themselves in one's vocation, especially in the vocation
of theologians and biblical
scholars.
David Johnston, author
of Earth, Empire and Sacred Text, Christine Schirrmacher, a
scholar with the Institute
of Islamic Studies
of the
Evangelical Alliance in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, and Joseph Cumming, director
of the reconciliation program at Yale Divinity School, discuss whether Christians should support laws that ban Muslim women from wearing the face veil in public.
Everyone who is anyone was there:
Evangelicals and Catholics; Jews and Muslims; Sunni and Shia; the «Dharmic» religions
of Asia; and
scholars from different disciplines.
Even though the two
scholars represent opposite ends
of the
evangelical spectrum on salvation, both made essentially the same allegation: the wording seems, at best, theologically careless and, at worst, represents a heretical understanding
of sin, human nature, and the human will.
Malone, an independent
scholar, has years
of experience in student affairs work, including a doctoral study focused on students» relational practices on
evangelical campuses and how they differ from broader patterns
of campus life in America.
How can N.T. Wright, an
evangelical New Testament
scholar, co-write a book with his friend Marcus Borg, a progressive, panentheist, and fellow
of The Jesus Seminar?
The evidence for this phenomenon is incontestable: the influx
of non «SBC
evangelical scholars into Baptist seminaries; the changing
of the name
of the Baptist Sunday School Board to the more generic LifeWay Christian Resources; the presence and high profile
of non «Baptist leaders on SBC platforms, e.g., the closing message at the 1998 SBC delivered by Dr. James Dobson, a Nazarene; the aggressive participation
of the SBC's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission as an advocate for the conservative side
of the culture wars conflict; new patterns
of cooperation between SBC mission boards and
evangelical ministries such as Promise Keepers, Campus Crusade for Christ, the National Association
of Evangelicals, Prison Fellowship, and World Vision.
Studies by Protestant and Catholic
scholars show that one reason for the
evangelicals» success is the lack
of sufficient Catholic priests to serve the burgeoning population.
One recent paper read at a meeting
of the
Evangelical Theological Society (again, by a
scholar from one
of Lindsell's «safe» schools) vigorously defended the inerrancy doctrine but then rushed on to the hermeneutical level to distinguish between the timebound Weltbild
of Scripture which may be discarded and the eternal Weltanschauung
of Scripture which must be preserved.
Thirdly, although Steve gave no examples in his article
of any discrepancies, errors or contradictions in the Bible, those he gave in his February 2011 article on the subject have been refuted numerous times by
evangelical scholars.
Though it is impossible to know how many Pentecostals are in Latin America, there is a consensus among
scholars that they make up between 70 % and 80 %
of the
evangelicals, which number in the tens
of millions.
I have a hunch that one explanation accounts for the silence
of evangelical biblical
scholars more than any other: the basic fear that their findings, as they deal with the text
of Scripture, will conflict with the popular understanding
of what inerrancy entails.
Introduction
Scholars such as John B. Cobb and David R. Griffin have developed the Christological implications
of Whiteheadian process - relational thought in a number
of widely read works in recent years.1 «
Evangelical» Christians, holding the Christian scriptures to be the uniquely inspired and authoritative charter documents
of their faith, and finding in these scriptures a Christ...
To begin with, I might call his attention to Naomi Schaefer Riley's God on the Quad and Alan Wolfe's The Opening
of the
Evangelical Mind, not to mention the thoughtful criticism and self - criticism
of distinguished
scholars like George Marsden and David Lyle Jeffrey.
Recently joining the fray was
evangelical scholar Ben Witherington III
of Asbury Theological Seminary a prolific author
of New Testament studies.
Those
of us who call ourselves «
evangelical scholars» are accustomed to suspicion from the church and incredulity from the academy.
October 20 - 21 Join the Center for
Evangelical Catholicism and both Catholic and Protestant
scholars to discuss the theological reasons for the Protestant Reformation, the prospects for the restoration
of Church unity, and how Catholics and Protestants can work together going forward.
Christian fiction best - seller lists brim with Amish romance novels, largely because
of their large
evangelical readership, which
scholars trace to the 2006 shooting and its stunning postlude
of Amish forgiveness.
Some well - respected
evangelical scholars think this means Paul did not permit a woman
of that particular community to teach and dominate a man for selfish gain resulting in licentiousness (see recommended reading).
The New Testament
scholar explained how, in his
evangelical youth, he spent a number
of years trying to prove to people that Jesus had been raised from the dead.
Scholars such as John B. Cobb and David R. Griffin have developed the Christological implications
of Whiteheadian process - relational thought in a number
of widely read works in recent years.1 «
Evangelical» Christians, holding the Christian scriptures to be the uniquely inspired and authoritative charter documents
of their faith, and finding in these scriptures a Christ whose divine humanity defies explanation in terms
of any general metaphysical scheme, have had for the most part little interest in or even contact with these process - relational Christologies.2 That revelation presents to us this Christ is sufficient warrant for believing him; his being is, at any rate, incommensurate with ours.
So if it didn't exist during the time
of Jesus then
evangelicals, or any other religious
scholar, doesn't have the right to state their opinion on it?
A team
of five established and published
scholars — women and men, black and white — interviewed a wide variety
of families, ranging in religious orientation from Jewish to African - American Pentecostal, to white
evangelical, to mainline Protestant, to Catholic.
Last summer New Testament
scholar Helmut Koester wrote to Lutheran
scholars and church leaders across the country urging reconsideration
of «new plans» that might do «serious damage» to Fortress, which he characterized as «an important instrument
of theological scholarship»
of which the new
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America should be proud.
From RHE: Scot, you're one
of those writers / theologians / biblical
scholars that keeps me in the
evangelical conversation.
CNN: My Take: Counting the Bible's words doesn't yield a Republican Jesus Stephen Prothero, Boston University religion
scholar and author
of «The American Bible: How Our Words Unite, Divide, and Define a Nation,» responds to angry emails he received after writing a Belief Blog post in which he takes issue with
evangelicals using Jesus as a political tool to benefit the Republican Party.
I chatted to a well - known OT
scholar once, who stated, «There will come a day when
evangelical Christians have to repent
of their attitude to homosexuality; it is no more sinful than wearing polycotton shirts.»
I thought about the variety
of faith backgrounds represented on this blog — Catholics, Lutherans, Baptists, Presbyterians, conservative
evangelicals, agnostics, Mennonites, Methodists, Pentecostals, doubters, skeptics, fundamentalists, disenfranchised fundamentalists, religious
scholars, and religious misfits — and all I could think to say was, «My blog attracts people who are in transition... or who have recently transitioned... from one way
of approaching their faith to another.»
To summarize: the Years
of the
Evangelicals have been good to
evangelical scholars, partly because those
scholars have helped.
The college has joined both the Lilly Network
of Church - related Colleges and Universities and the Rhodes Consultation, and participates vigorously in the
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America's summer conferences on the calling
of the Lutheran college and in its Lutheran Academy for younger
scholars.
The book that Hughes edited contains an exchange between a Churches
of Christ
scholar, Thomas Olbricht, and
evangelical Mark Noll.
Many factors have contributed to what one
scholar has called «this curious ecumenical turn» within the recent history
of Catholics and
evangelicals, of which Evangelicals and Catholics Together is but
evangelicals,
of which
Evangelicals and Catholics Together is but
Evangelicals and Catholics Together is but one symptom.