Sentences with phrase «of event descriptions»

To learn more and for a list of event descriptions, please visit the HGSE Rural Education Alliance website.

Not exact matches

More info: Follow a quick description of the event with a URL to register.

I had been working for less than two weeks when I was asked to join the project team for a major field sales event that was outside of my job description.

Netflix description: «This drama follows the political rivalries and romance of Queen Elizabeth II's reign and the events that shaped the second half of the 20th century.»

Andrew Herdman, director general of the Association of Asia Pacific Airlines, said the IATA data needs to be viewed with caution «as event descriptions are not always standardized» and there are «significant variations in the level of voluntary reporting by airlines.»

I can count on one hand the number of people I've met in New York meetups and events that fit this description.

note: After Fast Company published this story, photos and video available online from SolarCity's March 2015 Las Vegas sales - team huddle, which we previously linked to in this article's description of the event, were removed from Flickr and YouTube.

See «Description of the Trust Agreement — Termination of the Trust» for more information about the termination of the Trust, including when the termination of the Trust may be triggered by events outside the direct control of the Sponsor, the Trustee or the Shareholders.

The Board has developed written position descriptions for the Chairman of the Board, the Lead Independent Director in the event that the Chairman is not independent, for the Chairperson of each Board committee and the CEO.

All that crap about the «holy spirit» requires you to accept, a priori, that the bible is accurate in its description of events that took place.

«The most widely cited descriptions of the events reported at Fatima are taken from the writings of John De Marchi, an Italian Catholic priest and researcher.

In the description and narration of such events, great literary skills can actually impede the proper response, as many of us learned when Updike reported his view of the towers» fall» from a house in Brooklyn» in the most delicately pointillist of styles.

Luedemann [Jesus, 122 - 24] presents four (4) reasons for regarding the miraculous conception of Jesus as unhistorical: (1) Numerous parallels in the history of religion; (2) it represents a rare and late NT tradition; (3) Synoptic descriptions of Jesus» relations with his family are inconsistent with such an event; and (4) scientific considerations.

The present - day methodology of history and science as an accurate accounting of historical events and an objective description of physical processes simply didn't exist when these stories were composed.

In fact the «number of the beast» aka 666 is a direct reference to Nero, not a description of a future event.

The judge, by his own description of events, lied.

They are descriptions of natural events that best enable us to predict future, similar events.

The real Tom Austin, why haven't you posted descriptions of any of your dreams BEFORE any events occur in real life that might make your claims plausible?

If the meaning of our principle of historical aetiology, as opposed to an eye - witness report by someone who was himself present at the event, has been understood, we presumably also possess a criterion for judging what was correct in the description given by traditional theology of the blessed, supernatural, original condition of man, as opposed to what was a simplified projection into the past, into human beginnings, of the state of man as it ought to be and will be in the future.

Some seem to assume through this description of events that Jesus was teaching His disciples that His blood would purchase the New Covenant and the forgiveness of sins from God.

Such conformation is witnessed just as clearly by accurate descriptions of natural and historical events as by abstraction, generalization, and inference.

But this does not mean that every place we find enthusiastic, emotionally tinged descriptions of events we should conclude that they lack objectivity or that they bear no relation to the real.

The mystery of the Kingdom as an intimation of ultimacy in the midst of our immediacies, speaks a language consonant with this new epoch of relational thinking issuing from field theory and the complexity of any description of events that begins with relatedness.

I have read a dissertation that analyzes quantum events in terms of Whitehead's description of the phases of concrescence.

It pertains not to history as a firsthand description or recording of actual events (Historie) but to history in the sense of the phenomenal life of humankind in the world (Geschichte).

But we infer it from the description of events given by Jesus.

The age - long tradition of the «events» of Easter day, so old that it was caught up in the New Testament itself, can no longer be defended as an historical description of the resurrection of Jesus.

For this reason the resurrection idiom is to be regarded as a metaphorical description of a coming event.

College students have amazed and amused me over the years with descriptions of events such as Moses and the Israelites barely escaping the Pharisees — who had pursued them through the wilderness.

Clifford Geertz defines thick description as «an elaborate venture in» the «piled — up structures of inference and implication» in human events and structures.

Still later, the Deuteronomist, continuing to recall the metaphor of the Exodus event, wrote a description of life lived without the comfort of a lively trust in Yahweh.

But if He chiefly follows the way of guiding external events [and this, needless to say, is Temples view], these constitute the primary vehicle of the revelation; and events can not be fully formulated in propositions; the event is always richer than any description of it» [pp. 100 ff.].

A more contemporary mechanism, however, would recognize that since no description of an actual event is ever complete, any actual experience of the event may give novelty, that is, may give an aspect of the event not previously perceived.

It is further expressed in the unique events accompanying Matthew's description of Jesus» death and resurrection.

complete description of any event would be immensely complex.

It would be more correct to speak of texts as «straightforward descriptions» of an event or state of affairs, to use Kelsey's phrase, if one has in mind this notion, «symbolic reference,» in Whitehead's theory of perception, rather than «propositions,» as Kelsey does.

Each contains a description of events still to come, and each ends with a renewed call to discipleship in the here and now.

Throughout the Lipstadt work runs the theme that the description and interpretation of the events collectively called the Holocaust are easily known and eternally fixed.

Furthermore, the notion of pregnancy here, together with descriptions of Nature as events (VI 200, 208), converges on Merleau - Ponty's preference in La Nature for a Whiteheadian potentiality in nature as against Sartre's full and complete en sui, and also reinforces Merleau - Ponty's appreciation of Whitehead's term «concrescence.»

But there are also inaccuracies of detail and description, and it is therefore better to conclude that though some eyewitness material lies behind this gospel (perhaps from John himself), the final writing and compilation were done by one who was not a participant in the events described.

In the description of this simple human experience I have used the relatively neutral term» events» to characterize the other occurrences on which the human occasion of experience depends for most of its content.

In fact, since many scholars believe that the events described in the book of Job occurred long before the author of Genesis was alive [1], what the book of Job records about the flood may well be the earliest description of what happened in that cataclysmic event.

This is a far cry from the prosaic grammar of description of everyday events, and therefore moves beyond the meager imaginations of those who dwell only in the flat and descriptive world of sense experience.

This description of events could equally well belong to Whitehead or to Merleau - Ponty; it describes the immanence whereby the Anglo - American would see one event lying within its predecessor, or it describes the sedimentation by which time layers itself out, event by event, experience by experience.

Remembering Henry Young's point, we are compelled to ask, how adequate are the descriptions of concrete events which serve as the testing ground for metaphysical truths?

It should be noted that while medieval scholars relied heavily on final causes in their descriptions of the natural world, modern developments in the natural sciences since the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries have placed almost exclusive emphasis on efficient cause as the basic determinant of physical and biological events.

First, (a), the assertion that all nature (here taken to mean the totality of happenings in the universe) simultaneous with the percipient event is a complete event involved in perception is an incorrect description of what happens in perception.

Or, if we knew that the description in Exodus 19 has no external (archaeological) relationship to place, time, and event and that it is simply and intentionally metaphorical, we would be afforded the luxury of shedding at least for the moment the responsibilities of geographer - topographer - historian; we could then read the passage in the knowledge that here at least no clues exist to aid in the possible reconstruction of an actual event.

Corresponding to every true tensed description, indeed constituting every true tensed description as one of its components, there is a timeless meaning core which is tenselessly expressible and which is true both before and after the occurrence of the event in question.

They are meant to make a point, not be seen as descriptions of future events.