Sentences with phrase «of experience people actually»

One of the big questions the study set out to address is whether the way payday lenders present their products — as a quick, hassle - free way to get cash for a week or two when an unexpected expense crops up — reflects the kind of experience people actually have with these loans.

Not exact matches

Some of the experiences people started sharing were harrowing, like the time one user said he actually had the cops called on him when the neighbor mistook him for a burglar.

What most people mean by «empathy» is actually affective empathy — the ability to experience and respond to the feelings of others.

In my experience, I haven't actually seen a lot of people, or managers, actually execute on that.

We met plenty of smart young people straight out of great business schools, but they lacked the breadth of experience — actually building companies, developing technology and operations, taking products to market — that the team at Carrick had.

Some people claim that too much domain experience can actually harm you because you become cynical of all the things that can't be done — you've got the scars to prove it.

(On the flip side, this situation leads to a special type of investment operation that actually causes people to seek out ownership of bad businesses when they think the economy is likely to recover given that they experience bigger upswings as the operating leverage effect happens in reverse.)

The Treasury Board president proceeded to use the word «experience» thrice before boasting that, «This appointment was made pursuant to a very rigorous process where a number of highly qualified individuals were identified, and we have found the person who is the most qualified to actually have this position.»

In my experience, people don't actually see the amount of work that goes into achieving success.

In my experience, when people start talking of a lost decade for stocks somewhere, this is often a good time to actually own stocks as the next decade is often a lot better although it might not look so.

The words do not actually represent the vastness of the person, thing, experience... etc...

You consider it «intelligent discourse» when people insist on reinterpreting and explaining away the lived experiences of marginalized people, as if they are in a position to understand those experiences better than the people actually living through them?

Oh go eat it, the love that people have actually experienced in their lives is so much more real than the abstract notion of an afterlife.

To say that you are degrades the experiences of people who have actually undergone persecution.

You're misusing the term here and as a result belittling the experience of people who are actually persecuted.

I'm thinking Mr Professor didn't actually sit with many people and experience the act of death.

actually there are approximately 36.3 million people — including 13 million children — that live in households that experience hunger or the risk of hunger... that is far too many people please do not use your blasphemy of the atheists / non-believers as an excuse for this especially given the number of innocent children involved

this system of spiritual beings is a multi-staged hierarchy, which spans 50 dimensions and every spiritual plane attached to these dimensions, with a supreme, male god - being who is above the 50th dimension, and many of these beings pretend to be «good» but are manipulators who impose suffering, and through brainwashing, force, and authority / domination, they condition people to believe that suffering is «good» for a «learning experience» (read the article that is in the link i shared) but i am left wondering why so few actually question this?

«The point is speaking and sharing a message to people that actually you're experiencing and living and believe is true because it's becoming more and more the story of your life... you know what I mean?

Each person, as he or she interacts with other individuals, groups, institutions, and concepts, brings into focus one potential configuration representing his or her experience of what actually happened.

With the changing demographics in America, including the racial and ethnic, socioeconomic, immigration, and biblical justice challenges of our day, it is more important than ever for people of color to have safe places to live authentically, serve humbly, and use their influence and experiences to shape our theology (what we know and believe about God) and our praxis (the ethics of our human behavior or what we actually do).

@Christine «When dragons and lauprechans start to explain quamtum machanics, make sense of otherwise inexplicable personal experiences, and seem to actually better people's lives, I'll be more than happy to believe in them, too...»

This way of thinking is actually dangerous, according to Whitehead, because it carries people away from the world of values and promotes the privatization of experience and, hence, of morals (SMW 195 - 196).

When dragons and lauprechans start to explain quamtum machanics, make sense of otherwise inexplicable personal experiences, and seem to actually better people's lives, I'll be more than happy to believe in them, too...

If such an eventuality actually took place, experience «would... include in an undivided present the entire past history of the conscious person, not as instantaneity, not like a cluster of simultaneous parts, but as something continually present which would also be something continually moving» (CM 152).

Actually, this «oedipal period» helps prepare a child for eventual marriage, by giving him a basic experience of relating to a person of the other sex.

For such persons, to see the words «Evangelicals for McGovern» actually in print was an experience of sweet vindication.

Half of the people experiencing it aren't actually near death.

The experience of many interested observers is that most young people who go to a secondary Catholic school are not sure what a sacrament actually is or does and would find it hard to name them.

The dark night of the soul is actually a common experience in the Christian life and can occur throughout a person's faith journey.

And that is much more useful than David simply providing a new definition for two reasons: he's seeking not necessarily to redefine, but to challenge already existing inconsistencies between our use of the words and how people actually function, AND because such terms are given their meaning collectively so redefining it alone would be meaningless because it wouldn't draw on people's real experience with their beliefs and views of the labels.

The men viewing her will not be drawn in to wonder about her thoughts and feelings, her experiences of joy and sorrow, her strengths and vulnerabilities — the things that actually make her the unique person she is.

In a way Religion is for Dummies... reading your comments has been true pleasure because I did not think it was actually possible to have a discussion with someone who would post a comment that stupid on a board... there is a god or there is no god because I say so because of my limited experience... what wonderful ignorance most people here have...

My experience is that people who use that form of words do not actually love the sinner very much either.

An Emergent definition of relevance, modulated by resistance, might run something like this; relevance means listening before speaking; relevance means interpreting the culture to itself by noting the ways in which certain cultural productions gesture toward a transcendent grace and beauty; relevance means being ready to give an account for the hope that we have and being in places where someone might actually ask; relevance means believing that we might learn something from those who are most unlike us; relevance means not so much translating the churches language to the culture as translating the culture's language back to the church; relevance means making theological sense of the depth that people discover in the oddest places of ordinary living and then using that experience to draw them to the source of that depth (Augustine seems to imply such a move in his reflections on beauty and transience in his Confessions).

The statistics are merely sets of data measured in a specific context and at least the person who posted them had the respect to allow us to make our own interpretation rather than inserting his own opinion which is what Buddha actually wanted people to do... not just accept things on blind faith but interpret for themselves and experience for themselves.

He actually mentions names, and appeals to the witness of people still alive who had had that experience.

Sitting with a group of adolescents and answering their questions about your marriage might sound scary but it is actually a really life - giving and enriching experience for the couples who volunteer and the young people are often amazed and inspired to see that marriages can last and that love can grow through a life time.

If there wasn't so much blatant age discrimination in other industries, if other fields actually respected life experience, these people wouldn't have to resort to this line of work but the minute you become a «person of age» in this country, corporations show you the door.

It has actually been my experience in ministry that I have witnessed people come to a place of realizing that they donâ $ ™ t really believe the way they thought they did, that they donâ $ ™ t subscribe to the platitudes, principles or practices that they inherited and thoughtlessly adopted.

So if this person is just using «starvation» and «death» as metaphors, and they aren't actually experiencing the horrors of starving or dying like the kids in Somalia, then its pretty selfish to describe their life as if they were being punished.

While the debates rage on about whether Noah is biblical enough, Heaven is For Real true enough, and God is Not Dead profitable enough, Philomena delivers a quiet, understated, and powerful portrayal of the actual human experience, where clear - cut lines between good and evil, heroes and villains, right and wrong might be good «story-wise» but don't reflect the reality most people of faith actually live in.

One of the most difficult experiences as a recipe creator is sharing a recipe that you know in your soul is a winner, then having few people actually try it (or at least letting you know they tried it, I guess!)

FYI covers a range of stories and experiences that reflect how people actually live their lives today, not defined by just one passion or interest.

It was odd because I hadn't really heard this in the past, but the more I ask around I found that people are actually avoiding the bench press a little more because of the negative effects they, or someone they know has experienced.

If I may, I think that for the most part, when women * actively * seek out advice on pregnancy, childbirth, and babycare, they DO talk to real people (if they actually know people in real life who have those sorts of experiences, of course).

Young people, in particular, filter much of their experiences through their phones, so turning phones off for extended periods of time may actually cause them to feel less connected.

I wanted to do something concrete, so that Tariku could actually look people in the eye and have an experience of interacting with individuals.

But if you actually do give birth without any medical intervention, just the mere fact of sharing the story of that experience is considered «shaming» by some people who have had (or want) a different experience.

So, people who were previously happy with their hospital experience are convinced that there was actually something horrible and dehumanising about the experience, and that all of the interventions they had were «unnecessary» and violating.