Sentences with phrase «of expert medical opinion»

Following receipt of expert medical opinion, we were able to argue successfully that the Defendant had been negligent in failing to carry out spinal x-rays at an earlier stage, or to carry out an appropriate neurological examination, amongst other failures.

A separate trial for Kenny, according to the then state of the expert medical opinion evidence, a lesser player in the unlawful death of Brian Fudge, was at once viable, reasonable and in the interests of justice.

Not exact matches

is mediated by our own unique belief system, then this issue of expert opinion can be a real problem, especially where belief and the «self» is involved, as opposed to expert knowledge on medical / legal / other issues.

«One month removed from the crash and based upon the expert advice of the doctors who have treated and assessed my head and spinal injuries post accident, it is their best medical opinion that I must stop racing.

you are not the medical expert so do nt assume things that are fundamentally wrong ^ ^ medical diagnostic isnt like the managing aspect of a team where every pundit can have his (wrong) opinions, one who isn't a medical expert shouldnt even talk about it not even the coaches or managers like at the incident in chelsea with mou

In my opinion the board of the players association combined with fitness / physio / medical experts should be allowed to perform a detailed research within Arsenal's (Arsene's) methods.

Because you are a member of our team - whether you are a visitor, member, coach, administrator, medical expert, or advertiser - we value your input, suggestions, opinions, and questions.

The MEPs voting for the Resolution were heeding the expert opinions of medical and public health bodies from across Europe, US, Asia and Latin America and from UN bodies, including WHO, UNICEF, Save the Children, the UK Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, the Standing Committee of European Doctors (CPME), the European Midwives Association, Eurochild, Association of European Cancer Leagues, the European Federation of the Association of Dieticians (EFAD), the European Federation of Nurses Associations (EFN), COFACE (the Confederation of Family Organisations in the European Union), EPHA (the European Public Health Association) BEUC (the European Consumers Association), the German Midwives Association, the California Women Infants and Children Association, Sustain's Childrens Food Campaign, the National Childbirth Trust, the Baby Feeding Law Group and the International Baby Food Action Network

For the development of products in the field of medical vacuum technologies, Medela has established a strong cooperation with key opinion leaders and medical experts in hospitals worldwide.

-- Judith Marcin, MD Answers represent the opinions of our medical experts.

Jen has written you the book that she wished for as a new parent of a colicky baby: a book that gives parents clear and balanced explanations, practical tips and solutions, explains why some experts have different opinions and backs it all up with references to the relevant medical research.

The articles featured attention grabbing headings, highlighting issues pertaining to the state of maternity services, supplemented by a range of expert opinions including the relevant government authority, medical or obstetric experts, Australian College of Midwives (ACM) and consumer groups.

A handful of medical Google Glass start - ups have been launched, including Remedy, which allows a doctor to live - stream a patient meeting to a specialist when an expert opinion is required.

She regularly consults medical experts and attends leading edge continuing education events to stay abreast of current opinion on the subject and is in no way acting irresponsibly in her online service promotion nor in her delivery of dietary advice to clients.

Bottom Line, Inc. publishes the opinions of expert authorities in many fields These opinions are for educational and illustrative purposes only and should not be considered as either individual advice or as a substitute for legal, accounting, investment, medical and other professional services intended to suit your specific personal needs.

In response to the plaintiff's lawsuit, the defendant retained a medical expert to ascertain the source of the plaintiff's alleged injuries and offer a medical opinion as to whether the injuries were caused by the plaintiff's fall on the defendant's property.

In addition to the medical expert retained by the defense, the plaintiff also hired a doctor to serve as an expert witness and offer an opinion on the source of the plaintiff's injuries.

If you have been treated improperly by a health care professional, do not hesitate to consult the Chillicothe medical malpractice attorneys of Agee Clymer Mitchell and Portman to get an expert opinion on whether you should pursue a medical malpractice lawsuit.

One of the most important aspects of any medical malpractice lawsuit is the hiring medical experts to give reliable opinions.

A: A jury will consider testimony by experts — usually other doctors — who will testify whether in their expert opinion, your physician followed standard medical practice or fell below the accepted standard of care.

The Certificate of Merit is an opinion from a medical expert / certified physician offering evidence that the physician has reviewed the plaintiff's medical records, and based on the review, believes that there is a strong argument for an act of malpractice committed by the defendant based on the fact that evidence suggests the defendant deviated from the appropriate standard of care.

Many, if not most, vendors of expert medico - legal opinion evidence attend endless conferences and seminars offered by the Canadian Society of Medical Evaluators (CSME) during which the topic of the duties of experts repeatedly arises (encapsulated here: http://www.csme.org/news/178847/CSME-Response-to-the-CPSO-Draft-Policy-Medical-Reports.htm

The limited number of LAT decisions rendered to date, provide several examples of accident victims being unsuccessful in their claims because they failed to present sufficient documentary evidence and supporting medical opinions to counter the expert medical opinions which the insurers obtained from their medical specialists.

In medical malpractice cases, therefore, a plaintiff does not need an expert opinion in order to «discover» the existence of a potential lawsuit.

A jury will ask to hear testimony from other medical professionals who can speak to the duty of care and whether or not, in their expert opinion, the duty of care was breached.

At trial plaintiff's counsel attempted to impeach a defense expert with his history of payment from a medical malpractice insurer, by whom he had been paid on several occasions for testimony or opinions.

In a medical malpractice case, one of the most valuable types of evidence is that of opinions of experts.

The value of Claim, not just the pain, suffering and loss of amenity element but also the financial losses and care and assistance claim, is entirely dependent on the medical expert opinions.

Do Not Let Defendants Exclude Your Medical Experts» Opinions on Causation, Consumer Attorneys of California's Forum Magazine, September 2004

An attorney will also consult with medical experts who can provide an opinion on whether or not the doctor acted negligently (in fact, to even file a malpractice claim in Pennsylvania, a Certificate of Merit must be filed, which is a document that contains a physician's sworn testimony that, in their opinion, negligent more likely than not occurred).

Not all problems after medical care are the result of medical malpractice and only a medical expert can render an opinion to determine if litigation is warranted.

The article covers how a judge in the U.S. District Court in Connecticut excluded the plaintiff's medical causation expert on Daubert grounds after finding insufficient evidence of the plaintiff's exposure to the drug, which was necessary to support the expert's opinion on specific causation.

In a dramatic admission of medical illiteracy the Court of Appeal conceded that absent expert medical opinion evidence, a judge is not qualified to say what is, or is not, an illness (Saadati v. Moorhead, 2015 BCCA 393).

Under Minnesota law, an affidavit in support of a medical malpractice case must identify the expert who will testify, the substance of that testimony, and provide a summary of the basis for the expert's opinion.

Lawyers can hire medical specialists and other experts to provide opinions on the nature of your injuries, how they have impact your life and what treatment you will need in the future.

He relied and relies too heavily on painkillers when, in the opinion of the medical experts, he should be properly exercising.

Most importantly, you will need to be able to show that this failure led to your child's injury, illness or birth defect by having medical expert opinions critical of those medical professionals being accused and finding those accused medical professionals to be responsible for the child's injuries or birth injuries.

Medical malpractice cases often come down to a so - called «battle of the experts» between the plaintiff and the defense, with expert witnesses from both sides offering opinions on the defendant's actions, whether they were in line with the standard of care and whether the defendant caused the plaintiff's injuries, as well as the impact of the plaintiff's underlying condition.

Successful ICBC personal injury claims require expert medical opinions, especially in the Supreme Court of British Columbia.

[52] I prefer the opinions of the medical experts who agree that Ms. Odian's condition is chronic.

In practice, this means that there will often be good prospects in medical negligence claims, other than the most straightforward, for seeking an extension of time to bring claim outside the 3 - year time limit, where a client (the patient) delays seeking legal advice or investigation of the claim until outside this 3 - year timeframe from their initial injury, or where provision of the expert opinion does not occur until this 3 - year time limit has expired.

The Court of Appeal found the Appeal Commissioner at WCAT had appropriately reviewed the expert medical opinion of Dr. Colin F. Davey (retained by Maritime Paper).

Further to my previous posts about Independent Medical Exams in BC Supreme Court Injury Claims unpublished reasons for judgement recently came to my attention (Hou v. Kirmani BCSC Vancouver Registry, 20091119) dealing with the ability for a Defendant to have an injured party undergo multiple exams where the first defence expert feels an opinion from a second expert would be of benefit.

As part of its new partnership with American Medical Forensic Specialists, Dr. Gary Gansar analyzes testimony from Dr. Katharine Wenstrom, an expert on obstetrics, whose opinion played a key role in a nearly $ 45.8 million verdict for the family of... Read More

[318] In arriving at this conclusion I accept the opinion of Dr. Maloon, in preference to that of the plaintiff's medical experts, that the soft tissue injuries the plaintiff sustained in the accident would not have been «significant enough to alter the natural history of her neck or low back condition» and that the «disc herniation would be the result of the natural history of the lumbar degenerative disc disease and not the result of injuries that she may have sustained in [the accident].»

While it is possible to build a defence based on expert medical opinion, it helps to have additional evidence to tip the balance in favour of a successful defence.

Our lawyers will then collect evidence to support your claim, including medical records, documents and the opinions of independent mental health experts.

Often, these cases result in a scenario where the opinions of medical experts are pitted one against the other, resulting in uncertainty and risk for the parties.

In Bottiglia v. Ottawa Catholic School Board, 2017 ONSC 2517, the Ontario Divisional Court held that an employee's duty to accommodate may permit, or even require, the employer to ask for a second medical opinion where the employer has a reasonable and bona fide reason to question the adequacy and reliability of the information provided by its employee's medical expert.

In fact, an Idaho statute mandates expert opinion of those facts in all medical malpractice cases.