Sentences with phrase «of facts at hand»

When it comes right down to it, the side that is most determined will be the side that knows up - front that its» position is the one that will stand up under the cold, objective scrutiny of an unbiased judge's or tribunal's consideration of the facts at hand.

Besides, if your partner reacts emotionally to your diagnosis, you'd have plenty of facts at hand to give him an idea of the reality.

One of the real crimes of the film is Jackson's mishandling of contemporary ideas on the slippery nature of facts at the hands of nefarious forces, which Denial all but misses the mark if you're not there to connect the threads.

Not exact matches

This episode also features Soap Time, a multimedia «Edutainment» experience of lights, music and fun facts to keep kids at the sink for 20 seconds, the proper time to ensure clean hands.

It is not inconsistent — in fact, it is wholly reasonable — to say that some people (people guilty of multiple child murders for example) absolutely «deserve to die,» but at the same time to say that the state shouldn't be trusted with the discretion to hand out that sentence.

On the other hand, a later study that measured time spent looking at images of men kissing found no evidence that some homophobic men are gay at a subconscious level - in fact, some of the homophobic men seemed to have an implicit aversion to such images.

«The thing we have to be careful about is we need to try and find the opinion of the middle as opposed to listening to the loud voices on the outside and that requires very careful scrutiny and listening with the facts at hand.»

In fact, «there has never been any report of a human population in which left - handed individuals predominate», according to archaeologist Natalie Uomini at the University of Liverpool in the UK.

Or more commonly, it doesn't apply when you consider all of the facts of the situation at hand.

In fact, Paypal's magic hand can be felt throughout Palantir's own structure — whether it's through Thiel's outsized influence in providing $ 40 million of seed money and guidance, or Lonsdale's own internship at the payments company while he was still a student at Stanford.

Love it or hate it, the fact is that research shows a massive 15 % of American adults have tried their hand at online dating.

Just look at our current political situation: those worried about Trump have to contend with the fact that the power of the executive branch has been dramatically expanded over the decades; we place immense responsibility and capability in the hands of one person, forgetting that said responsibility and capability is not so easily withdrawn if we don't like the one wielding it.

The task of rhetoric is to divert attention from the fact that the financial sector aims not to «free» markets, but to place control in the hands of financial managers — whose logic is to subject economies to austerity and even depression, sell off public land and enterprises, suffer emigration and reduce living standards in the face of a sharply increasing concentration of wealth at the top of the economic pyramid.

According to the IRS, fair market value is the «price at which property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither having to buy or sell, and both having reasonable knowledge of all the relevant facts.»

«The fact that dead coins were relegated to oblivion by the invisible hand of the market, doesn't mean that they should remain forgotten, at the fringe.

«Our volunteer model is pretty unique in the fact that we provide a free and open door opportunity [to volunteers], removing boundaries for people who want to help,» Lauren Muldowney, Chief of Volunteer Experience at All Hands and Hearts, told Global Citizen.

Using the argument of neutrality is too dismissive to the more pertinent fact at hand — likely about $ 300k was deployed to control $ 1.6 m, to be used in any way shape or form when it is all said and done... retiring abroad, funding their kids college, starting their tube meat meat truck business after they get tired of the lawyering rat race, etc etc..

In fact, I remember when I was a kid and listening to our pastor basically justify abuse of wife & kids at the father's hands because the bible says the family must be obedient to the father (and it does say that about the obedience part).

In the case of compulsive hand - washing, this involved a patient acknowledging that his hands were in fact clean (relabeling); attributing anxieties and doubts about his hands being dirty to a misfunctioning brain (reattributing); directing his thoughts and actions away from handwashing and toward productive ends (refocusing); and, lastly, understanding at a deep level the senselessness of OCD messages (revaluing).

The fact that there are both does NOT make morality relative, it means that one needs to know more than simply that a death of one person occurred at the hands of another person to judge the morality.

Paul was simply encouraging everyone in their faith, and as a matter of fact he was soon to have his head chopped off at the hands of Caesar, so what good did it do hiim if he was trying to control people with his letters?

It has long been clear from apparatus like miniature and 8 mm cine cameras, as well as the tape recorder, which are in actual fact already in the hands of the masses, that the individual, so long as he remains isolated, can become with their help at best an amateur but not a producer.

The shotgun approach was just attempted at me yesterday as a matter of fact... it turned out not one of the verses cited in the list had anything to do with the topic at hand:)... as per usual.

The fact remains that all of us, including you, will find out first hand at the end of our days.

everything in the universe evolves, not only life forms but also memes, Religion is a meme so it also change in conformity to its era or time of its conception as faith.Because in pre scientific times thousands of years ago, the scientific method of approach or philosophy has not existed yet, myth or merely story telling is considered facts, The first religion called animism more than 10,000 years ago believed that spirits or god exists in trees, rivers, mountains, boulders or in any places people at that time considered holy.hundreds of them, then when the Greeks and Romans came, it was reduced to 12, they called it polytheism, when the Jews arrived, it was further reduced to 1, monotheism.its derivatives, Christianity And Islam and later hundreds of denominations that includes Mormonism and Protestants flourished up to today.So in short this religions evolved in accordance to the scientific knowledge of the age or era they existed.If you graph the growth of knowledge, it shows a sharp increase in the last 500 years, forcing the dominant religions at that time to reinterprete their dogmas, today this traditional religions are becoming obsolete and has to evolve to survive.But first they have to unify against atheism.in the dialectical process of change, Theism in one hand and the opposing force atheism in the other, will resolve into a result or synthesis.The process shall be highlighted in the internet in the near future.

But one way or another all advocates of animal rights, process thinkers included, lament the fact that so many domesticated animals can and do suffer unnecessarily at the hands of humans.

By observing of the world stage on God's timeline, with all the man's advancements in tech and science, yet such corruption of human character, it only points to the fact that the time for the «man of sin» is at hand and his army is being prepared, for time of his arrival.

Your theory is deficient because it is not taking into account all the of the known facts about the universe that we have at hand.

Under that definition: — Christians own every death ever to have occurred at the hands of a Christian govt (a nice side effect of that is you acknowledge that the US is in fact a Christian Govt)

Tutu sensed that the moment for closure was at hand, and said that Sylvia had suggested she might be able to shake hands if there were an honest disclosure of facts and feelings.

Here's the pattern at hand: a) discouragement or disgust with radical politics or the undeniable impact of some conservatism - friendly facts, results in a move away from political statements and activism, a retreat, into counter-culturalism, self - discovery, and artistry - for - artistry's sake, b) shifts in the political situation, or disgust at «apathy,» provoke a passionate recommittment to the leftist cause or a new articulation of it, and then, at some point, the rock - bohemian returns back to a).

Yahweh in hebrew means my Lord and is a common reference meaning supreme God.In the bible satan is referred specifically as the adversary in hebrew or slanderer in greek its quite clear there is no confusion.Satan is not in the same league as God he is sovereign in fact God has satan on a leash and limits his control particularly over his people as we read in Job.Christians need to realise that satan can influence us if we walk according to the flesh.In the case of David calling a cencus meant he gave in to his pride he wanted to know how many soldiers he had believing numbers would give him the upper hand and so Satan took advantage of his weakness and Davids choice displeased God.David of all people should have known as he as a young man had defeated goliath a mighty warrior and it was because of his faith and trust in God that he overcame.But it wasnt God that made David make that decision it was his own and satan tempted him and he gave in to that desire In the two verses there is no confusion if you understand how God and satan operate i did at one stage have the same issue with Jesus sending the demons into the pigs why would he help satan or at least it appeared that way?

Gensis is a beautiful story of the fact that at someplace in sometime, the world evolved through God's hands as did a soul.

It may not have much value as evidence for the facts of the life of Jesus, but it is at any rate undeniable first - hand evidence for the faith of the early church, and this is well worth studying.

Something apparently insignificant like a relatively unknown Jewish holy man dying an unremarkable death at the hands of the Roman Empire is in fact an invitation into a much larger reality.

God's Revelation can in fact and in principle concern realities which themselves are accessible to secular experience of a scientific or historical kind, so that on the one hand what Revelation states about them is open to possible threat of an eventual at least apparently opposed discovery of secular science and on the other hand natural science must in principle always reckon on a possible veto on the part of theology (Cf. Denzinger 1947 ff., 2187).

Churches, when once established, live at second hand upon tradition; but the founders of every church owed their power originally to the fact of their direct personal communion with the divine.

Wilson bristles at the example - and yet it appears that he still hasn't taken hold of the point: the fact that 95 percent of the people in the country «loved their children» would still not establish why the law is justified in protecting those children at the hands of those parents.

At the outset, it should be observed that a valid answer to the Christological question must, on the one hand, give full weight to the empirical fact of the revelation and, on the other, must avoid including as an essential element of itself anything not at least latent or implicit in that empirical facAt the outset, it should be observed that a valid answer to the Christological question must, on the one hand, give full weight to the empirical fact of the revelation and, on the other, must avoid including as an essential element of itself anything not at least latent or implicit in that empirical facat least latent or implicit in that empirical fact.

Yet we would do well to listen to Niebuhr insofar as he was at least willing to face up to the fact that human beings can not survive, to say nothing of prosper, unless they dip their hands in innocent blood.

Pete If you are referring to the inaccurate statement from the Smithsonian that atheists love to post regarding the Bible at least read the entire letter which excludes this: `... On the other hand, much of the Bible, in particular the historical books of the old testament, are as accurate historical documents as any that we have from antiquity and are in fact more accurate than many of the Egyptian, Mesopotamian, or Greek histories.

it only points to the fact that the time for the «man of sin» is at hand and his army is being prepared for time of his arrival.

All I can try to do now is to remind you that the process of reflection upon the God of Jesus, by which I mean upon the good news announced by Jesus, that the kingdom of God is at hand, was begun and carried on by people whose thinking was determined by the fact that they belonged to a particular community.

Someone further down mentioned the fact that these 4 were once covered by HL and it seems rather hypocritical of them to take the stance they are now, especially when it was proven that the 4 at hand do not cause abortion.

This is an enormous step for a pope to take, and if the leader of the world's Catholics can take it, surely Protestants can acknowledge their own sins and the fact that Catholics have been martyred at the hands of Protestants.

Sadly you also throw around the term «child abuse» with a cavalier looseness that suggests you don't have the foggiest idea what child abuse is... it's a shame abused children everywhere can't write in and tell you about their trevails at the hands of an abuser... Jesus Christ was no abuser... if I'm wrong about Jesus, he was at least a Rabbi who loved his followers, and who taught, peace, compassion, forgiveness, and inclusiveness... If I'm right, Jesus is the most amazing, wonderful gift GOD could ever give to his beloved creation... in either event, belief in him, and sharing those beliefs with children is not abuse, it's loving and nurturing fact based belief, not mythology...

What kind of democracy are we when education institutions and teachers refuse to mention the fact that some 30 to 60 million Natives were killed at the hands of European invasion and colonialism?

If, on the other hand, the source of the ache is in fact at some other point of my body (as in the case when a leg has been amputated) then the truth relation does not obtain.

Its okay to bash Christians by extracting passages from the bible, but it is disgusting to mention the fact that the greatest mass extermination of humanity (and in modern times) was at the hands of atheists.

I'll assume from that, that you realize your ridiculous rant on the use of the word reference and your equally ridiculous rant about the way Christine paraphrased a particular reference was in fact a useless waste of time that had nothing to do with the discussion at hand but you just can't bring yourself to admit you were wrong.