Sentences with phrase «of fallible humans»

lol gods opinion is nothing but the bigoted words of fallible humans written over 1500 + years.

Of course you take a leap of faith when you adhere to what a bunch of fallible humans wrote in that book.

The Christians» claim, the nondualist would say, is unrealistic; for scriptures, though inspired by God, are transmitted through the minds of fallible humans.

Religion could make sense, but for people to mindlessly follow it without evidence of good and only the record of fallible humans is, well, illogical.

Who can say they are 100 % confident that a gov» t made of fallible humans can be 100 % justified in 100 % of death sentences?

Without recourse to an immutable reality impervious to biological aberration, the progressive can not defend the will as any more reliable an indicator of gender identity than the rest of the fallible human body to which it belongs.

The logic goes that the absence of both fallible human judgment (apologies to the humans out there) and human salary requirements make indexing a performance - and cost - smart investment.

We both think of them a fallible human beings.

Needless to say, reducing 14 chapters of material to 31 pages involves a great deal of fallible human judgment.

Not exact matches

Fortunately, our Founders had the prescience to know that fallible humans would seek to increase the power of government, so they created the Bill of Rights to thwart that agenda.

As those MEN were human, they were certainly fallible, and probably many of them made significant changes in their own bid for power.

But he is most certainly another fallible human being, like the rest of us, who is reaching the lost.

Dalahast, I'm not trying to get into epistemology, but I do think that human perceptions are fallible and memory is one of those perceptions.

It can do so only by neglecting the human factor, the presence of which necessarily relativizes all perspectives into working hypotheses, necessarily turns the claim about an absolute edition of the world into one among the many fallible claims about the world proposed by fallible human beings.

80: «The mere process of verbalization, being a human and hence fallible operation, introduces possibilities of error that involve more than memory.»

All religions, irrespective of what that religion may be, «came from man,» and they are all flawed because «mankind» consists of fallible and imperfect human beings.

You seem to have alot of pride in your «goodness» but you are a fallible human like the rest of us.

I would tend to think that this may not please God, to have the fallible writings of humans attributed to him.

All leaders, regardless the source of their authority, are human, fallible and MUST BE QUESTIONED.

It helps manage the disappointment when the cool new group you find yourself with is eventually revealed to be full of flawed and fallible human beings, and it helps to free you from the initial desire to rationalize shitty behavior within a group merely for the sake of identity politics.»

Our foreign policy is formulated by fallible, egocentric human beings who constitute our government and who inevitably are serving their scheme of values and their understanding of life.

Rather, in my view, they are most faithfully engaged with as a collection of books written by fallible human beings whose work bears the hallmarks of the limitations and preconceptions of the times and the cultures they lived in, but also of the transformational experience of their encounters with God.

The wood is the fallible human flesh, the gold the infallible spirit of God.

When one of those scientist who themselves are imperfect and fallible create a tree, car or say a human out of nothing before our eyes then and only then will I believe what they have to say.

Thus, the fact that God is the ultimate author of Scripture is downplayed for apologetic reasons, the stress being instead put on the «fallible» human minds and hands that produced the text.

Whether you're married, engaged, in a relationship or want to be in a relationship one day, you must accept this fact: A relationship is made up of two imperfect, fallible selfish human beings.

Because HUMAN BEINGS ARE FALLIBLE, always will be, and because of that, religious sects... all of them... will NEVER be «pure».

They often take away the diety of Our Lord by placing more emphasis on so called human fallible «saints» and «pray» to humans such as Mary who did not remain virgin once she gave birth to Christ and had more children.

If the combinations are necessary, they give metaphysical truth; if impossible, they give metaphysical error — in both cases with the qualification that our human understanding has only fallible powers of discernment in such matters.

On the other hand, if this man was human as I am, if he was a limited, feeling, fallible creature like myself, and he was able to live in this way and love in this way and give of himself in this way — then so can I. And his teachings are then relevant, for they come from someone who shared my predicament.

To think God is to think an analogue superior in principle to a human person; to think a human person is to think an individual with fallible, partly erroneous, unclear, more or less confused forms of knowledge but not the unqualified knowledge, coincident with truth, which God has.

One of the marks of the presence of the Holy Spirit is the acknowledgement by fallible men that the pure love of God can not be claimed for any human community, even the Church.

What I DO N'T do is accept, without question, the fallible human interpretations of God.

Christians should agree that there exists a perfect orthodoxy in the mind of God; however, the proliferation of schisms, disagreements, and divisions throughout church history points to the fact that we as sinful and fallible humans are imperfect at agreeing precisely on that orthodoxy.

The Newman that emerges is at once more human, more fallible, and indeed perhaps more attractively accessible than that of previous biographies.

Weren't the church «fathers» who established the current canon of the Bible also fallible humans?

As with all others, pastors and other in «the ministry» are only fallible human beings in desperate need of our Saviour, Jesus Christ.

By simple extension, he's more than capable of distributing a simple message out to all, instead of relying on fallible human beings who would just mess it up.

The system of checks and balances they built in the Constitution was formed not only by the recognition that good citizens may differ over the proper course of action, but also, at least in part, by the Biblical understanding of humans as fallible and prone to wrong - doing, and therefore frequently in need of some healthy opposition from their fellows.

We can glean much, but not all - certainly not after all the re-writes and self - serving «translations» of ancient texts, real and forged, that have been made by very fallible, very human Popes and monks over the centuries.

If — a big «if» — we keep in mind that Paul was a limited, fallible, context - bound human being, then all of this is fine.

The fact that the Bible (Torah, Koran, etc etc etc) is fallible, written by humans and completely invalid as a source of morality — is irrelevant to the reality that, of course, God exists in some form.

I recognize that we are all fallible human beings, which means that either (or both) of us could be wrong, but that doesn't mean we aren't sincerely trying to seek the truth.

What could not be pinned down though, given that all human mediators were held to be fallible, was the correct interpretation of it.

For even if we may worry about fallible humans waging unjust wars, the creation of machines capable of deciding their own actions in (or out) of war is at least morally questionable.

«However, events of the intervening years have shown that like any other human and like many other Nigerians, I was fallible.

While human decisions will always be fallible), that might be a chance to step away from somewhat Panglossian tone defending of everything in this case, and perhaps acknowledging there might be things to learn from it for the future.

At the end of the day, John Piper is still a fallible human being in need of a Savior (just like me!).

Coates says that the idea of a more fallible, human king of Wakanda flows directly from previous storylines.

Human beings are born of blood, bound by gravity, eventually to perish... fallible by design... destined.