Sentences with phrase «of fault divorce»

The concepts of a no fault divorce and a fault divorce are state - specific and can also be confusing.

In the litigation of fault divorce, the term used in the counterclaim to accuse the plaintiff (complainant) of adultery, if initially stated as a ground for divorce against the defendant (respondent).

Critics of the no fault divorce laws here in the United States have long claimed that the ease of negotiating an uncontested divorce process is just too easy and actually encourages people to get divorced.

Tomorrow (4 December) MPs are due to debate the introduction of no fault divorce, as Richard Bacon MP's No Fault Divorce Bill has its second reading.

Leading family law organisation Resolution is urging MPs to support the principle of no fault divorce if they are serious about reducing family conflict and the ongoing impact of divorce.

Much like an annulment, they simply do not exist anymore with the advent of no fault divorce.

The Virginia Court of Appeals then noted that under Section 20 - 91 (A)(9)(c), the entry of a no fault divorce decree does not lessen the obligation of either spouse to support his or her spouse, unless the spouse proves the existence of a fault ground in his or her favor.

The supine acceptance by many churches of no fault divorce makes the «I have become a Christian so it is all different now» defense appear implausible, even if it is actually true in specific cases.

They lack the social capital, and so will be more likely to become victims of the new regime of legal drugs, just as they've become victims of no fault divorce and the sexual revolution more broadly.

The theory behind this partial resumption of fault divorce is that if it becomes more difficult to divorce, there will be fewer divorces.

Not exact matches

Although all states now have «no fault» divorce proceedings, some jurisdictions still take into account the grounds for divorce when dividing assets, said Justin Reckers, a certified financial planner, divorce financial analyst and CEO of WellSpring Divorce Addivorce proceedings, some jurisdictions still take into account the grounds for divorce when dividing assets, said Justin Reckers, a certified financial planner, divorce financial analyst and CEO of WellSpring Divorce Addivorce when dividing assets, said Justin Reckers, a certified financial planner, divorce financial analyst and CEO of WellSpring Divorce Addivorce financial analyst and CEO of WellSpring Divorce AdDivorce Advisors.

First, it extends the logic of the redefinition of marriage which the earlier legislation on no - fault divorce required: Marriage is no longer a lifelong, monogamous bond between two people of the opposite sex intended for the raising of children and the provision of a stable family environment; rather, it is a relationship of mutual convenience, to be dissolved as and when it becomes inconvenient to the contracted parties to maintain it.

I'm also quite capable of debating with him about whether or not government marriage in New York should allow no - fault divorce or whether married couples (as defined by the state!)

Many of the leading writers on gay marriage have spoken well about the need to limit no - fault divorce, and are clear about their moral opposition to contraception.

High in the catalogue of social pathologies afflicting marriage and the family in America stands our system of family law, the central purpose of which is to enforce no - fault divorce.

But there is no reason to believe that the widespread reenactment of fault or more restrictive divorce laws by itself would produce beneficial results.

Weitzman's The Divorce Revolution led the proponents of no - fault divorce and women's independence to relinquish one of their fundamental beliefs: that the majority of women could sustain themselves financially after a divorce withouDivorce Revolution led the proponents of no - fault divorce and women's independence to relinquish one of their fundamental beliefs: that the majority of women could sustain themselves financially after a divorce withoudivorce and women's independence to relinquish one of their fundamental beliefs: that the majority of women could sustain themselves financially after a divorce withoudivorce without help.

Cultural attitudes that reject the gift of life lead very easily to social acceptance of abortion, of no - fault divorce, and of fatherless families.

Long before there was a debate about same - sex anything, far too many people bought into a liberal ideology about sexuality that makes a mess of marriage: Cohabitation, no - fault divorce, extra-marital sex, non-marital childbearing, massive consumption of pornography and the hook - up culture all contributed to the breakdown of our marriage culture.

The elected representatives of the several states repealing laws that allow for no - fault divorce.

The other, through the exigencies of no - fault divorce...

But when no - fault divorce and contraception have become so commonplace, little remains of the original arguments.

For the Church to blame contraception and women leadership on the fault of divorce, rape, drug abuse in kids, people having sex before marriage on women is hypocritical.

No - fault divorce changed the American culture of marriage.

a / No fault divorce, one of the worst thing ever for marriages -LCB- and accompanying loss of social stigma on divorcees -RCB-

This, it seems, is a part of no — fault divorce.

The Nuffield Foundation's new report called «Finding Fault» claims sixty per cent of divorcing couples are making up stories of adultery and bad behaviour in order for the divorce to go through quickly under «fault - based» laws.

When the divorce revolution took off with the advent of no - fault divorce in the 1960s, experts predicted that marriages overall would be happier because all the unhappy people would get divorced.

The sexual revolution and the impermanence wrought by no - fault divorce have produced unprecedented loneliness and the phenomenon of sad, bar - crawling post-divorcee moms.

Tubbs» targets range from no - fault divorce to Supreme Court precedents undermining state regulation of contraception and obscenity, and he has much that is interesting to say about each.

Perhaps the great fault of positivism is that we were left with the presupposition that our science and technology ought to be divorced from the cultures out of which they arose.

As the libertarian blogger Megan McArdle once pointed out, that possibility is more likely than it sounds: With the advent of no - fault divorce and the extension of welfare benefits to unmarried mothers, the late twentieth century demonstrated that marriage is both more important and more fragile than reformers had thought.

Well, honestly, we kind of already have «no - fault divorce» for most people with regard to church.

The first no - fault divorce statute was drafted in California by a legislator who had ended a 25 - year marriage to wed a younger woman; of the 14 assemblymen who testified for the law, ten were divorced.

It shifted the normative image of marriage from that of an enduring covenant to that of a limited contract — and later, under no - fault divorce, to a contract that could be dissolved by either partner for any (or even no) reason whatever.

On another level, the revolution in no - fault divorce law which has been of no help to the modem American family has been legitimated by the individualist rights - discourse of modernity, which Berger seems to believe is an unqualified good.

No - fault divorce and the severance of children from the definition of marriage have already created a marriage culture that eats away at the ties that bind humans.

At the very least, she adds, the period between the filing and granting of a no - fault divorce should be lengthened: two to five years is the range in many West European nations.

Since the no - fault divorce revolution began in California in 1970 and spread to all 50 states, divorce decrees have generally mandated an equal division only of the couple's present assets and liabilities.

And because we (thankfully) have no - fault divorce, she doesn't have to offer an excuse to anyone, nor do any of us seeking to end a marriage.

Once no - fault divorce came along, the rates of suicide, domestic violence and even murder at the hands of their partner for women dropped dramatically.

A return to fault - based divorce is almost certainly out of the question as a political matter, but some plausible common - sense reforms could nonetheless inject a measure of sanity into our nation's divorce laws.

Wolfinger also explores the divorce reform movement in America and argues in favor of no - fault divorce laws, arguing that a return to an age of tough divorce laws would recreate the social conditions that used to make divorce harder on children.

Because of the financial and social hardship faced after divorce, most people assume that generally husbands have instigated divorce since the introduction of no - fault divorce.

«The best interests of the child» governs in child custody, yet no - fault divorce does not serve that end.

There were a lot of other good books about divorce for children, how it's not your fault, and how mom and dad still love you, but not one on this issue of transitioning between mom's house and dad's house.

The concept of no - fault divorce that is now legally enshrined (and is a good thing in itself) can unintentionally result in the individuals believing that they bear no responsibility for the breakdown.

And I think that no fault divorce as a concept should be part of our domestic relations law.

Giuliani's divorce attorney, Raoul Felder, said no - fault divorce «makes victims of the wrong people.»

New York has officially become the last state in the nation to adopt no - fault divorce following the governor's signature of a measure that will permit couples to separate by mutual consent, signaling a major policy shift that has far - reaching implications for both families and attorneys.