The results are striking: The last two years have witnessed the largest jump in state standards since they were established as
part of the federal accountability program.
Add it up and, despite frantic efforts by a number of groups to preserve some sort
of federal accountability mandates in the next ESEA cycle, I think these should go away and almost surely will.
Sen. Steve Daines, R - Mont., offered the highly contentious A PLUS Act amendment, which would have allowed states to opt
out of federal accountability entirely and send funding under the current law back to states in the form of block grants.
Despite frantic efforts by a number of groups to preserve some
sort of federal accountability mandates in the next ESEA cycle, I think these should go away and almost surely will.
My interpretation: The idea
of federal accountability remains popular, the title No Child Left Behind is not popular, yet a good share of the public is willing to support re-enactment of some kind of change in the law.
First, just as the states refused to make good on the «equal» part of «separate but equal» after Plessy, for more than 40 years states have failed to provide equal access to the funding needed to achieve excellent schools for all children, largely because of a
lack of federal accountability for equitable school funding.
A dozen years after standing with President George W. Bush to issue in a new
era of federal accountability with the passage of No Child Left Behind, conservatives in the House and Senate removed substantive federal carrots and sticks that were credited with shining a spotlight on the «soft bigotry of low expectations.»
waiver
of the federal Accountability Performance Targets / Standards Setting Procedures to allow TEA to replace the current Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) calculations and performance targets with the state's accountability rating system
In letters to the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives, New Leaders joins 29 organizations, along with educators and parents across the country, in calling for the
maintenance of federal accountability regulations.
By the time the lawmakers returned from Easter recess, they had a deal: a bill that would keep NCLB's annual testing requirement but strip out
much of the federal accountability that has led to cries of executive overreach from Republicans.
Many education organizations applaud the enhanced accountability and funding flexibility the bills provide to states and local districts, but civil rights organizations have serious concerns that the
loosening of federal accountability mandates could lead to growing achievement gaps.