Not exact matches
The parties agree that the state or
federal courts in New York shall have non-exclusive
jurisdiction of any Section 27 Dispute.
Subject to the arbitration provisions above, and other than small claims actions as permitted therein, any action or proceeding arising from, relating to or in connection with these Terms
of Service will be brought exclusively in the
federal or state
courts located in New York, New York, and you irrevocably consent to the personal
jurisdiction of such
courts and agree that it is a convenient forum and that you will not seek to transfer such action or proceeding to any other forum or
jurisdiction, under the doctrine
of forum non conveniens or otherwise.
In 2011, the Supreme
Court sided with the provinces on the main question
of jurisdiction, while leaving the door open to
federal - provincial co-operation.
And then the Supreme
Court of Canada dealt him a severe blow in 2011, when it ruled his plan overstepped
federal jurisdiction.
For years, patent owners, especially those that have never «performed» the patent, used the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit's broad interpretation
of the patent venue statute to force infringement lawsuits into favorable
jurisdictions.
Those
courts may still decline to assume
jurisdiction (as here), but the only reason that ethical counsel could countenance undertaking this second round
of litigation was precisely because the
Federal Court of Appeal had declined to address the matter.
On 6 August 2013,
Federal Judge Amos Mazzant
of the Eastern District
of Texas
of the Fifth Circuit ruled that bitcoins are «a currency or a form
of money» (specifically securities as defined by
Federal Securities Laws), and as such were subject to the
court's
jurisdiction, [274][274] and Germany's Finance Ministry subsumed bitcoins under the term «unit
of account» — a financial instrument — though not as e-money or a functional currency, a classification nonetheless having legal and tax implications.
The Trustee and the Sponsor both consent to the non-exclusive
jurisdiction of the
courts of the State
of New York and the
federal courts located in the borough
of Manhattan in New York City.
Finally, Cook says that the FBI is proposing what Apple is calling «unprecedented use»
of the All Writs Act
of 1789, which authorizes
federal courts to issue all orders necessary or appropriate «in aid
of their respective
jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles
of law.»
The suit alleges that the law gives the Ugandans standing to sue Lively for his activities, which had a crucial nexus in the U.S. and therefore come under
federal courts»
jurisdiction; it also charges that Lively not only advocated bad ideas in an abstract context but helped various Ugandans conceive and manage a campaign
of persecution, thus involving himself in a joint criminal enterprise.
The
federal and state
courts of the State
of New York shall have exclusive
jurisdiction over all claims Miscellaneous Termination.
10.1 Any dispute relating in any way to your visit to a Nestlé Waters North America Inc. website or to products or services you purchase through a Nestlé Waters North America Inc. website shall be submitted to confidential arbitration in Stamford, Connecticut, except that, to the extent you have in any manner violated or threatened to violate Nestlé Waters North America Inc.'s intellectual property rights, Nestlé Waters North America Inc. may seek injunctive or other appropriate relief in any state or
federal court in the state
of Connecticut, and you consent to exclusive
jurisdiction and venue in such
courts.
The Parties agree to venue and
jurisdiction of the
courts in the State
of California, County
of Orange for actions brought in State
court, and County
of Los Angeles for actions brought in
federal court.
The Committee recommends that the
jurisdiction of the
Federal Magistrates
Court be extended to enable it to deal with Misuse
of Market Power (s. 46 and s. 46A where cases rely upon s. 83), Contravention
of Industry Codes (s. 51AD) and Unconscionable Conduct (Part IVA).
Any legal action or dispute arising out
of, relating to or concerning the Terms
of Use and the Site shall be exclusively brought in the state or
federal court of competent
jurisdiction in the State
of California, USA.
Your name, address, telephone number, and e-mail address, a statement that you consent to the
jurisdiction of the
federal courts located within the State
of Connecticut and a statement that you will accept service
of process from the person who provided notification
of the alleged infringement.
The
federal and state
courts of the State
of New York shall have exclusive
jurisdiction over all claims
You hereby expressly and specifically waive any objection You may have, pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution or otherwise, to the
jurisdiction of, or any award that could be granted by, the United States
Federal Courts.
Any claim arising from the information contained on the eDairy News website shall be submitted to the competence
of the ordinary
courts of the First Judicial District
of the Province
of Cordoba (Primera Circunscripción Judicial de la Provincia de Cordoba), Republic
of Argentina, in the city
of Córdoba, excluding any other
jurisdiction (
Federal jurisdiction is also excluded).
Your name, physical address and telephone number, and a statement that you consent to the
jurisdiction of Federal District
Court for the judicial district in which your physical address is located, or if your physical address is outside
of the United States, for any judicial district in which BEAM SUNTORY may be found, and that you will accept service
of process from the person who provided notification
of allegedly infringing material or an agent
of such person.
Any action relating to this Agreement must be brought in the
Federal or State
courts located Boston, MA, and you irrevocably consent to the
jurisdiction of such
courts.
GENERAL PROVISIONS By visiting this site you agree that the Terms
of Use shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State
of New York, without giving effect to any principles
of conflicts
of law, and that any action at law or in equity arising out
of or relating to these Terms
of Use and the Privacy Policy shall be filed only in the state or
federal courts located in New York County, New York and you hereby consent and submit to the venue and personal
jurisdiction of such
courts for the purposes
of such action.
Any action relating to this Agreement must be brought in the
federal or state
courts located in Seattle, Washington, and you irrevocably consent to the
jurisdiction of such
courts.
New York state lost a
jurisdiction dispute with the FERC, after the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit declined to review whether the
federal energy regulator had big - footed the state when it gave the green light to a controversial natural gas pipeline project in Orange County.
Judge Joan M. Azrack, in addressing a room full
of prospective jurors on Monday, let it be known that they'd been selected as representatives
of one
of the largest
federal district
court jurisdictions in the nation, covering Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, Nassau and Suffolk counties.
The suit was brought pursuant to Order 34, Rules 1 (1)(A); 2, Rule 3 (1) and (2)(A), (B) and (C)
of the
Federal High
Court Rules, 2009 and the inherent
jurisdiction of the Honourable
Court.
One
of the counts reads: «That you Nwobike, on the 19th day
of March, 2015 in Lagos, within the
jurisdiction of this Honourable
Court, intentionally gave the sum
of N750, 000 to Hon. Justice Mohammed Nasir Yunusa
of the
Federal High
Court directly through your United Bank for Africa Plc Account No. 1002664061 in order that the said Judge acts in the exercise
of his official duties».
Referring to the people in the Southern District, the formal name
of Manhattan
federal court's
jurisdiction, Kruger said, «They unnerved me.»
THE battle to determine the standard - bearer
of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Bayelsa State, on Thursday, shifted to the
Court of Appeal, Abuja Division, as Governor Timipre Sylva told the five - man panel, headed by Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa, that the PDP had invoked its
jurisdiction in order to stall hearing
of the substantive matter at the
Federal High
Court sitting in Abuja.
The proposed legislation also addresses the issue
of jurisdiction by streamlining the
federal court process and providing concurrent
federal and state review.
According to him, the US Embassy said it was because his name was among a looters list submitted to it by the
federal government arguing that the publication
of his name as a looter was malicious since he has not been convicted by any
court of competent
jurisdiction.
A copy
of the order has revealed that the fresh suit was filed by Saraki the same day a similar one which he filed before Justice Ibrahim Buba
of the Lagos Division
of the
Federal High
Court was struck out for lack
of jurisdiction.
The hues and cry
of Hon. James Faleke, the running mate to late Audu Abubakar may have just been given a wave
of hand as Justice Gabriel Kolawole
of the
federal high
court, Abuja, on Friday ruled that the
court had no
jurisdiction to hear the cases involving the Kogi governorship election, which was declared inconclusive on November 22.
A former Chief
of Defence Staff, Alex Badeh, who is currently being tried by Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has questioned the
jurisdiction of the Abuja
Federal High
Court to entertain the criminal charges filed against him by the anti graft agency.
This can be done, as Congress can determine the
federal courts jurisdiction, and in the case
of abuse
of authority, limit that authority.
One
of the charges read in part, «That you, Hyeladzira Ajiya Nganjiwa, between January 18 and December 16, 2013, in Lagos within the
jurisdiction of this honourable
court, being a judge of the Federal High Court, did enrich yourself with an aggregate sum of $ 144,000 through your account number 328446178210 domiciled in Guaranty Trust Bank Plc, so as to have a significant increase in your assets that you can not reasonably explain the increase in relation to your lawful income.&r
court, being a judge
of the
Federal High
Court, did enrich yourself with an aggregate sum of $ 144,000 through your account number 328446178210 domiciled in Guaranty Trust Bank Plc, so as to have a significant increase in your assets that you can not reasonably explain the increase in relation to your lawful income.&r
Court, did enrich yourself with an aggregate sum
of $ 144,000 through your account number 328446178210 domiciled in Guaranty Trust Bank Plc, so as to have a significant increase in your assets that you can not reasonably explain the increase in relation to your lawful income.»
Another charge read, «That you, Hyeladzira Ajiya Nganjiwa, between January 6 and November 17, 2014, in Lagos within the
jurisdiction of this honourable
court, being a judge of the Federal High Court, did enrich yourself with an aggregate sum of $ 102,000 through your account number 328446178210 domiciled in Guaranty Trust Bank Plc, so as to have a significant increase in your assets that you can not reasonably explain the increase in relation to your lawful income.&r
court, being a judge
of the
Federal High
Court, did enrich yourself with an aggregate sum of $ 102,000 through your account number 328446178210 domiciled in Guaranty Trust Bank Plc, so as to have a significant increase in your assets that you can not reasonably explain the increase in relation to your lawful income.&r
Court, did enrich yourself with an aggregate sum
of $ 102,000 through your account number 328446178210 domiciled in Guaranty Trust Bank Plc, so as to have a significant increase in your assets that you can not reasonably explain the increase in relation to your lawful income.»
One
of the charges read, «That you, Adegbite Adetoye and Ponnle Abiodun whilst being directors
of Origin Oil and Gas Limited on or about the 8th day
of October 2010 to December, 2011 in Abuja within the
jurisdiction of the High
Court of the
Federal Capital Territory, Abuja and with intent to defraud, conspired to obtain the sum
of N735, 132, 076.18 From the
Federal Government
of Nigeria under false pretence that the said sum represented subsidy accruing to you, whereas the sum is above the actual subsidy payment for the importation
of 15,000 mt
of premium motor spirit (petrol) which you claim to have purchased from Vitol SA and imported into Nigeria through MT Silverie which representation you knew to be false.»
The
Federal High
Court sitting in Lagos has fixed March 1hear an application challenging its
jurisdiction in the trial
of a former Aviation Minister, Femi Fani - Kayode, charged with laundering N4.6 billion.
He is asking the judge to decline
jurisdiction and transfer the case to Abuja Division
of Federal High
courts.
It is on the basis
of the above that when on the 25th
of April, 2018, the Senate invited the Inspector - General
of Police to appear before it on the 26th
of April 2018, in respect
of the felonious offenses for which Sen. Dino Melaye was taken into Police custody, investigated and arraigned in a
Court of Competent
Jurisdiction in Lokoja, but because the Inspector - General
of Police was on official assignment with the President
of Federal Republic
of Nigeria to Bauchi on same date, he delegated the Deputy Inspector - General
of Police, Department
of Operations, Assistant Inspector - Generals
of Police and some Commissioners
of Police conversant with the matter to brief the Senate.
«That you, Isah Hamman Misau
of Hamman Misau Residence, Turaki Street, Misau, Bauchi State, on or about December 15, 2014, at the Independent National Electoral Commission Headquarters, Abuja, within the
jurisdiction of this Honourable
Court, did utter a false document to wit: a Statutory Declaration
of Age deposed to at the High
Court of the
Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, on December 15, 2014, by submitting same to the Independent National Electoral Commission knowing it to be false and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 1 (2)(c)
of the Miscellaneous Offences Act Cap M17, Laws
of the Federation
of Nigeria, 2004 and punishable under the same section
of the Act.»
«That you, Isah Hamman Misau
of Hamman Misau Residence, Turaki Street, Misau, Bauchi State, on or about December 16, 2014, at Abuja, within the
jurisdiction of this Honourable
Court, did utter a false document to wit: Affidavit in Support
of Personal Particulars
of Persons seeking election to the Office / Membership
of the Senate
of the
Federal Republic
of Nigeria (INEC FORM C.F. 001/2015) which you submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission knowing it to be false and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 1 (2)(c)
of the Miscellaneous Offences Act Cap M17, Laws
of the Federation
of Nigeria, 2004 and punishable under the same section
of the Act.
Saraki's appeal filed through his lead counsel, Mr. Joseph Daudu (SAN), is challenging the majority judgment
of the
Court of Appeal in Abuja delivered on October 30, 2015, which affirmed the
jurisdiction of the CCT to try him and the competence
of the charges
of false assets declaration preferred against him by the
Federal Government.
But Justice Gabriel Kolawole, in his judgment, delivered on July 1, 2015, held that he lacked
jurisdiction to entertain the suit while the June 8, 2015 judgment
of the Lagos Division
of the
Federal High
Court, nullifying the extradition application and affirmed by another judge of the same Lagos division on June 23, 2015, had not been set aside by any appellate c
Court, nullifying the extradition application and affirmed by another judge
of the same Lagos division on June 23, 2015, had not been set aside by any appellate
courtcourt.
The ECOWAS Community
Court of Justice dismissed a preliminary objection filed by the Federal Government of Nigeria challenging the jurisdiction of the court to hear a case of breach of fundamental human rights filed by Nnamdi
Court of Justice dismissed a preliminary objection filed by the
Federal Government
of Nigeria challenging the
jurisdiction of the
court to hear a case of breach of fundamental human rights filed by Nnamdi
court to hear a case
of breach
of fundamental human rights filed by Nnamdi Kanu.
(a) If Goods or Services are primarily being provided in the United States or any other location outside
of Canada, any legal suit, action or proceeding arising out
of or relating to this Agreement shall be instituted in the
federal courts of the United States
of America or the
courts of the State
of New York in each case located within Erie County, New York, U.S.A. and each Party irrevocably submits to the exclusive
jurisdiction of such
courts in any such suit, action or proceeding.
However, Justice I. E. Ekwo held that the
Federal High
Court lacked
jurisdiction to entertain the suit and directed that the case be transferred to the High
Court of Cross River State for hearing and determination.
However, due to the respect the IGP has for the Senate, that when on the 25th
of April, 2018, the Senate invited the Inspector - General
of Police to appear before it on the 26th
of April 2018, in respect
of the felonious offenses for which Sen. Dino Melaye was taken into Police custody, investigated and arraigned in a
Court of Competent
Jurisdiction while the Inspector - General
of Police was on official assignment with the President
of Federal Republic
of Nigeria in Bauchi on same date, that he delegated the Deputy Inspector - General
of Police, Department
of Operations, Assistant Inspector - Generals
of Police and some Commissioners
of Police conversant with the matter to brief the Senate.
«That you Mohammed Ahmed Katun while serving as an Assistant Director, Pension Department
of the Office
of Head
of Service
of the Federation on or about the 14th day
of August, 2009 within the
jurisdiction of this Honourable
Court, obtained by false pretences and with intent to defraud various sums
of money amounting in the aggregate to N24, 660,675.00 (Twenty Four Million, Six Hundred and Sixty Thousand, Six Hundred and Seventy Five Naira only) from the
Federal Government
of Nigeria through the Pension Account held by the Office
of the Head
of Service
of the Federation
of Nigeria through fraudulent payments described as collective allowances into your bank account maintained with Ecobank Nigeria Limited (former Oceanic International Bank Plc) and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 1 (1)(a)
of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006 and punishable under Section 1 (3)
of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006.»