In the United States, decades of federal regulations forbid the use
of federal education funds for single - sex schools unless school districts provided comparable educational opportunities for students of both sexes.
That is partially because they would lose hundreds of millions of
dollars of federal education funding and partially because few lawmakers trust the education system to do right by all kids once it's free from external benchmarks and measures.
Since the mid-1970s a few members of Congress from both parties have allied themselves with the largest beneficiaries of federal research contracts (the labs and centers) and ensured that these organizations receive a substantial
portion of federal education funding for R&D.
Those truly concerned about the prevalence of low - quality tests might ask Congress to restrict a small
amount of federal education funding, such as $ 30 or $ 40 per student, to be spent only on assessments.
That law, signed by President George W. Bush in 2002, says that in order to get certain
kinds of federal education funding, states must test their students every year in grades three through eight and once in high school.
«Districts risk losing $ 21.5 million
of federal education funding at the hands of the SDE, all without any consideration by the Connecticut General Assembly.
There are three major formula fund categories that traditionally account for the lion's
share of federal education funding — Title I, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and Title II.
Joel's wit and humor make the ledger numbers come alive, and he will comment on the
status of federal education funding for FY17, including what's happening with new formulas and programs under ESSA.
As the Center for Education Reform has highlighted, states have already received
most of their federal education funds for the year, making severe cuts in personnel and programs literally a choice, not a necessity.
Zeman said the flexibility given districts in 2009 over their budgets helped free up some funding for textbooks, but the district also has directed every
dollar of federal education funding that it can to professional development, instructional materials and technology to bring common core to its students.
In early 2014, Alexander introduced a bill in the Senate that would redirect $ 24 billion
of federal education funding and incentivize states to use the money to fund 11 million school vouchers for students in poverty.
In light of those concerns, a White House fact sheet stated, the administration will allow states to request «flexibility through waivers of specific provisions» of No Child Left Behind, including the timeline for proficiency; «flexibility regarding school improvement and accountability requirements,» which will allow states to set their own consequences for so - called failing schools; and «flexibility related to the use
of federal education funds.»