Sentences with phrase «of federal health care cuts»

«New York's financially struggling hospitals were living austerely within the State's Medicaid spending cap well before the recent avalanche of Federal health care cuts, while other sectors, such as education, have not been held to theirs,» said Kenneth Raske, president of the Greater New York Hospital Association.

Now, Kenneth Raske of the Greater New York Hospital Association is pulling hard the other way: «New York's financially struggling hospitals were living austerely within the state's Medicaid spending cap well before the recent avalanche of federal health care cuts,» Raske told the Daily News» Kenneth Lovett, «while other sectors, such as education, have not been held to theirs.»

Not exact matches

Congress is considering using a health care bill or other legislation to cut most of Planned Parenthood's federal funding and direct it to federally qualified health centers that do not perform abortions.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo this week raised the specter of a special session before the year ends to address the deficit caused by federal health care cuts — both already realized and potentially pending.

Stung by the expiration of federal aid intended to help states balance budgets as they seek to recover from the recession that began in 2008, the final budget is also expected to include another cut in local aid to cities and towns and to call for reduced growth in the rate of spending on education and health care, although special education is one of the few areas in which significant investments appear imminent.

Following a few years of relative fiscal stability thanks to the economic recovery and bank settlements following the financial collapse, New York is staring down a budget deficit of more than $ 4 billion, an amount that could be grow because of cuts in federal health care spending and the tax overhaul.

Proponents of raising taxes on New York's wealthiest say they have a new impetus to increase the state's revenue — the continued bad news from Washington about deep federal cuts to health care and other areas.

Reinstating this tax on buybacks would allow Governor Cuomo and the State Legislature to tax some of the windfall profits companies are making off the tax bill and protect New Yorkers from devastating federal cuts to health care and education.»

«As always, you have to make decisions about how much you can afford to do in school aid and how much money you have to put aside for the potential impact of federal cuts in Medicaid and in health care,» Assembly Majority Leader Joe Morelle (D - Irondequoit) said last week.

Another health care heavyweight has released a statement in response to Gov. Andrew Cuomo's call for $ 5.9 billion worth of Medicaid cuts (when the federal share is factored in to the $ 2.85 billion worth of state funding).

After weeks of warning about its possible consequences, a federal cut to New York's hospitals took effect on Sunday, adding stress to the state's already overworked public health care system.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Wednesday morning the federal budget outlook — and the fate of cuts to health care programs in New York — remained too vague to determine whether a special session of the Legislature was necessary.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo this week, meanwhile, opened the possibiltiy to a special session of the Legislature given the uncertainty surrounding the federal government, saying the cuts to New York to health care and elsewhere could run as high as $ 17 billion.

At the same time, he raised the possibility of a special session, depending on what cuts from the federal government may be imposed, including the impact of the Graham - Cassidy health care bill, should it become law.

«Many states would be forced to kick low - income and disabled people off their health care coverage once federal funding for the Medicaid program is cut, as this Senate bill would do,» said Chris Shelton, president of the Communications Workers of America.

They criticized Katko for at first pledging to preserve federal support of the reproductive health care organization and then later voting to cut off funding.

But Cuomo has decried on a broader level the Republican control of the federal government that he says will end up «cutting affordable housing, health care for the poor and food for the poor.»

The ad accuses Slaughter of a voting for a slew of tax increases, including the so - called «cap and trade» emissions measure and trots out the frequent Republicant talking point that the 2010 federal health care bill cuts $ 716 billion for Medicare, which is actually spread out over 10 years and targets subsidies to insurance companies.

A sobering report to governors about the potential consequences of repealing the Obama - era health care law warns that federal spending cuts probably would create funding gaps for states and threaten many people with the loss of insurance coverage.

Using a current - law baseline measure, the state budget gap for fiscal 2018 - 19 alone was last projected by DOB at $ 4 billion, a figure the governor himself began citing recently (without further explanation) in his recent warnings about the implications of federal health care spending cuts.

Cuomo and NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio are at odds again, this time over $ 1 billion worth of federal health care funding cuts that the mayor says the governor is «turning into a political football.»

Gov. Andrew Cuomo said a special session of the state Legislature may be needed if more than $ 2 billion in federal health care cuts to New York are allowed to take effect on Oct. 1.

The state already is facing a projected deficit of at least $ 4.4 billion that could worsen as a result of the tax bill and prior federal health care cuts.

ALBANY - Gov. Cuomo said a special session of the state Legislature may be needed if more than $ 2 billion in federal health care cuts to New York are allowed to take effect on Oct. 1.

«I and other members of the Senate Democratic conference stood firm against mid-year cuts to schools and also rejected health care cuts that would have cost New York hundreds of millions of dollars in lost federal funds,» Onorato said.

ALBANY — Aiming a new set of angry barbs at Washington, Gov. Andrew Cuomo warned on Tuesday that state lawmakers may need to return to Albany before the end of the year to address deep cuts to federal health care funding.

In a debate on Time Warner Cable television, both said they'd vote to repeal the new federal health care law, call for the resignation of Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki over revelations of mismanagement, support Fort Drum against defense department cuts, and join Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer in calling for more money to combat the heroin epidemic.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo, under the guise of bracing for the impact of federal cuts to health care spending, proposes a 14 percent tax on New York health insurers in his 2018 - 19 budget.

New York state, he said, should be a bulwark against what he said was damaging federal policy and must counter efforts to roll back cuts to health care, environmental protections and safeguards of marginalized populations.

According to the statement, the cuts would trigger a loss of $ 3 billion in federal funds for health care in resulting in a total loss for New Yorkers of $ 5.9 billion in Medicaid funding.»

The congressional Republicans» tax plan — with its call for the elimination of some or all federal income deductions that Californians have taken for state and local income taxes, sales and real estate taxes — accompanied by big cuts to health care spending, could affect the state's economy and budget.

The federal health care bill which is a repeal of the Affordable Care Act is calling for $ 880 billion in cuts to Medicaid over the next ten yecare bill which is a repeal of the Affordable Care Act is calling for $ 880 billion in cuts to Medicaid over the next ten yeCare Act is calling for $ 880 billion in cuts to Medicaid over the next ten years.

A legal challenge is being filed at the Federal Court of Canada, arguing that the federal government's cuts to refugee health care are unconstitutional, and in breach of Canada's obligations under internationFederal Court of Canada, arguing that the federal government's cuts to refugee health care are unconstitutional, and in breach of Canada's obligations under internationfederal government's cuts to refugee health care are unconstitutional, and in breach of Canada's obligations under international law.

The Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers and the Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care, along with two refugee claimants who had been denied benefits, filed an application in Federal Court to strike down the health cuts.

The legal challenge is being filed at the Federal Court of Canada on behalf of two patients who have had critical health care denied to them since the government cut health care coverage for refugees in June of 2012.

The Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers, together with Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care and two individual patients who were severely impacted by last year's changes, have asked the Federal Court of Canada to declare that the federal government cuts to refugee health care are unconstitutional and illeCare and two individual patients who were severely impacted by last year's changes, have asked the Federal Court of Canada to declare that the federal government cuts to refugee health care are unconstitutional and iFederal Court of Canada to declare that the federal government cuts to refugee health care are unconstitutional and ifederal government cuts to refugee health care are unconstitutional and illecare are unconstitutional and illegal.

That was certainly the case last month when he decided to take Ontario Health Minister Deb Matthews to task for her decision to step in and provide essential health care coverage for large numbers of refugee claimants who had been cut out of the federal government's longstanding refugee health care prHealth Minister Deb Matthews to task for her decision to step in and provide essential health care coverage for large numbers of refugee claimants who had been cut out of the federal government's longstanding refugee health care prhealth care coverage for large numbers of refugee claimants who had been cut out of the federal government's longstanding refugee health care prhealth care program.

On July 4, 2014, the Federal Court of Canada released a landmark decision declaring that the federal government cuts to the Interim Federal Health Program - a program that previously provided basic, life saving care to refugee claimants - are unconstittional and unFederal Court of Canada released a landmark decision declaring that the federal government cuts to the Interim Federal Health Program - a program that previously provided basic, life saving care to refugee claimants - are unconstittional and unfederal government cuts to the Interim Federal Health Program - a program that previously provided basic, life saving care to refugee claimants - are unconstittional and unFederal Health Program - a program that previously provided basic, life saving care to refugee claimants - are unconstittional and unlawful.

A legal challenge has been launched in the Federal Court of Canada, arguing that the federal government's cuts to refugee health care are unconstitutional, and in breach of Canada's obligations under internationFederal Court of Canada, arguing that the federal government's cuts to refugee health care are unconstitutional, and in breach of Canada's obligations under internationfederal government's cuts to refugee health care are unconstitutional, and in breach of Canada's obligations under international law.

Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care (CDRC), the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers (CARL), and three individual patients, are asking the Federal Court of Canada to declare that the cuts to refugee health care are unconstitutional and illeCare (CDRC), the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers (CARL), and three individual patients, are asking the Federal Court of Canada to declare that the cuts to refugee health care are unconstitutional and illecare are unconstitutional and illegal.

Similarly, in Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care v Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 651, the Federal Court found that the government's cuts to Interim Federal Health funding for refugee claimants and other persons seeking protection from Canada amounted to cruel and unusual treatment under s. 12 of the Charter, and was not justified by s. 1.

This radical move eliminates state and federal funding to nine Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin health centers in small communities like Oshkosh, Fond du Lac, Eau Claire, and Kenosha, and cuts off 12,000 uninsured women from access to preventive health care.

The federal government is now in the hands of extremist lawmakers who have tried for years to shut down Planned Parenthood health centers and cut our patients off from care.

The federal government is now in the hands of extremist lawmakers who have tried for years to shut down Planned Parenthood health centers and cut patients off from care.

• The second interim report of the Senate Select Committee inquiring into health policies raised concerns about the damage being done to primary health care by Federal funding cuts.

Jeb Bush cut funding for Planned Parenthood health centers while governor of Florida — and, if elected president would block patients who rely on federal funds from accessing preventive health care at Planned Parenthood.

The federal government is now in the hands of out - of - touch lawmakers who have tried for years to shut down Planned Parenthood health centers and cut patients off from care.

In response to federal efforts to «defund» Planned Parenthood health centers and cut patients off from basic, preventive care, thousands of people rallied at the Boston Common in March in the freezing cold.

Democrats maintained that denying federal money to Planned Parenthood would cut off millions of women from preventive health care services.

According to information provided by Bi-State Primary Care Association, which represents community health centers in New Hampshire and Vermont, «Without action by Congress before September 30, 2017, New Hampshire's Health Centers will face a devastating 70 % cut in their federal funds which could mean a loss of nearly $ 16 million and 47 % of their patients could lose access to care.&raCare Association, which represents community health centers in New Hampshire and Vermont, «Without action by Congress before September 30, 2017, New Hampshire's Health Centers will face a devastating 70 % cut in their federal funds which could mean a loss of nearly $ 16 million and 47 % of their patients could lose access to care.&health centers in New Hampshire and Vermont, «Without action by Congress before September 30, 2017, New Hampshire's Health Centers will face a devastating 70 % cut in their federal funds which could mean a loss of nearly $ 16 million and 47 % of their patients could lose access to care.&Health Centers will face a devastating 70 % cut in their federal funds which could mean a loss of nearly $ 16 million and 47 % of their patients could lose access to care.&racare.»