What should we make of the fact that, under our last Republican president we saw a great deal
of federal intervention in education policy and now, under a Democratic administration, we have a law that returns much of education policymaking to the states?
Not exact matches
In 2004, «response to
intervention» was introduced into
federal special
education law as a method
of identifying children with learning disabilities.
Taken together, these recent developments confirm that public
education is an area
of virtually complete state power (although now subject to greater
federal intervention) that can be reshaped by state legislatures
in either a centralizing or decentralizing direction or
in both directions at once.
«It's hard to reconcile the creation
of a new program with reducing
federal intervention in education,» Burke said.
The ESSA authorizes historically high levels
of federal education spending, continuing a trend that has increased
federal intervention in local school policy while failing to improve educational outcomes for children.
Last year, heeding calls for «local control»
of education decisions and less invasive
interventions in underperforming schools, Congress passed the Every Student Succeeds Act, granting states and local school boards, rather than the
federal government, broad latitude
in determining how to rate the performance
of schools and how to intervene when performance lags.
In fact, President Lyndon B. Johnson's support for, and the subsequent enactment of, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) in 1965 — the first significant federal intervention into education, which continues to authorize the bulk of federal K — 12 spending today — was born out of a belief that existing education programs and spending were not adequate for poor childre
In fact, President Lyndon B. Johnson's support for, and the subsequent enactment
of, the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act (ESEA) in 1965 — the first significant federal intervention into education, which continues to authorize the bulk of federal K — 12 spending today — was born out of a belief that existing education programs and spending were not adequate for poor
Education Act (ESEA)
in 1965 — the first significant federal intervention into education, which continues to authorize the bulk of federal K — 12 spending today — was born out of a belief that existing education programs and spending were not adequate for poor childre
in 1965 — the first significant
federal intervention into
education, which continues to authorize the bulk of federal K — 12 spending today — was born out of a belief that existing education programs and spending were not adequate for poor
education, which continues to authorize the bulk
of federal K — 12 spending today — was born out
of a belief that existing
education programs and spending were not adequate for poor
education programs and spending were not adequate for poor children.
«I see this as a good step toward limiting
federal intervention in education and restoring state and local control,» said Lindsey Burke
of the Heritage Foundation.
Collaborating with other
Federal, state and local agencies to avoid duplication
of efforts
in providing early
intervention and preschool
education.
The
Education Department has already targeted Delaware, California, Texas and the District of Columbia for federal intervention because special education students in these jurisdictions are not do
Education Department has already targeted Delaware, California, Texas and the District
of Columbia for
federal intervention because special
education students in these jurisdictions are not do
education students
in these jurisdictions are not doing well.
In combination, these initiatives have progressively increased the demands on teachers and their students and have laid the groundwork for what was to come next - an unprecedented
federal intervention on state level
education policy - making that directs all states toward a single goal (i.e., 100 %
of students reaching «proficiency») via a single system
of implementation (i.e., standards - based assessment and accountability).
«I'm concerned that states, with a combination
of state politics and inertia, will not... do aggressive
interventions for students
in struggling schools,» said Chad Aldeman, a former
federal education official who is now with Bellwether Education Partners, a Boston - based consult
education official who is now with Bellwether
Education Partners, a Boston - based consult
Education Partners, a Boston - based consulting firm.
The problem to be solved
in their eyes is not why increasing
federal and state funds targeted to low - performing schools and students over 50 years has been generally ineffective, but how our educational institutions for K - 12 can address low achievement despite the fact that the various
education interventions, strategies, policies, and regulations that policy makers in the U.S. Department of Education have imposed have mostly failed to move th
education interventions, strategies, policies, and regulations that policy makers
in the U.S. Department
of Education have imposed have mostly failed to move th
Education have imposed have mostly failed to move the needle.
In response, U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has suggested that the massive student boycotts of the Common Core tests as seen in New York is unacceptable, and if unchecked, could lead to federal intervention in our schools to ensure test complianc
In response, U.S. Secretary
of Education Arne Duncan has suggested that the massive student boycotts
of the Common Core tests as seen
in New York is unacceptable, and if unchecked, could lead to federal intervention in our schools to ensure test complianc
in New York is unacceptable, and if unchecked, could lead to
federal intervention in our schools to ensure test complianc
in our schools to ensure test compliance.
Noting that
education and regulation
of the legal profession are matters
of provincial jurisdiction, Saguil calls the
federal government's
intervention in the case «perplexing.»