And while Ken wants parents to speak out at the local level, her proposal might also raise their awareness of the deeper issue: Congress's chronic and shameful underfunding
of federal school meal programs.
As I understand it, because the Trump proposal is only looking (right now) at discretionary spending, it has no effect on the mandatory funding
of federal school meal programs, including the lunch and breakfast program.
First, Congress could ensure that federal per - meal reimbursements are not used to cover costs associated with foods offered outside
of the federal school meals programs.
She had this to say, «Given that the role
of the federal school meal program is to provide nutritious meals to students who may otherwise have no access to healthy foods - I wouldn't recommend banning flavored milk unless you have a comprehensive plan in place to compensate for the lost nutrients when kids stop drinking milk altogether.»
Not exact matches
«Perhaps my fears are unfounded; perhaps he will not bash the LAUSD and will rightly trace the root
of the problem back to
Federal underfunding
of the
school meal program.
-- we can not achieve the level
of improvement we would like for our kids without major changes to the whole
federal school meal program.
The new contract spells the end
of the district's short - lived foray into the National
School Lunch
Program, which provides
federal reimbursements in exchange for offering healthy free or reduced - cost
meals to low - income students.
It is presenting these
meals under the supervision
of the National
School Lunch
Program, which provides
federal funding in exchange for meeting certain requirements.
Nothing in any
of the worksheets takes into account a possible sudden drop in participation in the lunch
program if students dislike the changes implemented, a consideration which seems especially timely right now when we're hearing so much negative feedback surrounding the newly improved
federal school meal regulations.
WITS is part
of the First Lady's «Chefs Move to
Schools» planning team, so it was all the more surprising when the NYC DOE revoked authorization for the
program, claiming the WITS fresh, scratch - cooked
meals don't meet the new
federal school meal regulations.
By placing some parameters on
school food budgets as part
of reauthorization legislation, Congress could generate funds for the
meals programs and ensure that
federal funds are spent on the purposes that it intends.
There is no regulatory requirement that
federal reimbursements for free and reduced price
meals be spent only on those
meals or that records differentiate between the costs and revenues
of the various aspects
of the
school food
program.
When
schools offer both a
school meals program and competitive foods, the
federal government does not need to underwrite all
of the operating costs
of the entire
program; it is reasonable to expect the revenue generated by competitive foods to cover a share
of production, service, and overhead that can reasonably be attributed to providing those foods.
The loss
of federal funds has stung city
school officials, who started the
program with the idea that they would get
federal money to help pay for the free
meals, which are being served from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at various elementary
schools during the strike.
Districts participating in the
federal school meal program have been required since 2006 to formulate a wellness policy to promote student health, but such policies often consisted
of boilerplate language stashed in the drawer
of a district official.
Learn more about what today's students are looking for on their
school lunch menus, and get an overview
of participation trends in
federal school meals programs.
Fortunately, we have some answers to this problem in the form
of existing
federal child - nutrition
programs —
school lunch, breakfast, summer food, and after -
school snacks and
meals.
Though there is a nearly two - year - old state mandate that opens the free summer lunch
program to all children in Illinois — whether or not they're in summer
school — there has not been much improvement in participation, and officials say millions
of federal dollars available for the
meals are going untapped.
The
federal government reimburses states and
schools for the cost
of the
meals, and any
school or qualified community agency can use these
programs to ensure that no child goes hungry.
Last week the Associated Press ran a widely disseminated article indicating that: some
schools around the country are dropping out
of the healthier new
federal lunch
program, complaining that so many students turned up their noses at
meals packed... [Continue reading]
But, at least at present, the ultimate check is a triennial audit by the state agencies overseeing
federal school meal programs; this audit covers hundreds
of items, everything from food safety to sanitation, and also includes determining whether a district has a wellness policy in place that's being enforced.
I was so appalled by a system (called the «nutrient standard» method
of meal planning) that would lead to this bizarre result that I began to learn as much as I could about the
federal school meal program.
Yet, for all its faults, the
school meal program is one
of the most successful
federal social endeavors
of all time, right up there with Medicaid and Social Security.
While we still have a lot
of work to do in terms
of reducing
schools» reliance on highly processed foods, children dependent on the
federal lunch and breakfast
programs (as well as after -
school snack and even
school supper
programs) can and do have access to nutritionally balanced
meals each and every
school day (and throughout the summer where summer
meals are offered.)
For most Vermont
schools, the per -
meal reimbursement and commodities provided by the
federal school breakfast and lunch
programs is not sufficient to cover all
of these
school meal program costs.
Nearly all
of the state's 54
school districts have signed up for the
program, and the
schools are buying Alaska food they couldn't afford when they received only
federal support amounting to less than $ 2 a
meal.
Still another policy called for by SNA would extend the comment period on the «Smart Snacks in
Schools» standards which, for the first time ever, will (beginning July 1st) impose some regulations on «competitive foods» sold at
school outside
of federal meal programs, including at a la carte snack bars, vending machines, and student stores.
Woldow recognizes that SNA makes these recommendations with an eye to the fiscal bottom line
of school meal programs, and that
schools need more
federal funding to carry out the mandates
of the Healthy, Hunger - Free Kids Act.
In this role, she is responsible for leading the efforts to improve public policies to end hunger, reduce poverty, promote nutrition and increase the availability
of healthy affordable food in low - income areas; maximize participation in all
federal nutrition
programs (SNAP,
school meals, early childhood nutrition, WIC, and summer
meals); and educate the public about both the stark reality
of hunger's existence in the nation's capital and the real opportunities for effective solutions.
Christian's project contributes about $ 250,000 toward the cost
of the
program and receives about $ 1 in
federal school aid through the Chicago Public
Schools for each
meal served, according to Maureen George, the project's
program director.
(By way
of reminder, «competitive» foods are those foods sold on
school campuses outside
of the scope
of the
federal meal program, such as «a la carte» foods sold in the cafeteria or vending machines by a district to raise revenues, as well as foods sold at sporting events, team and PTO / PTA fundraisers, etc..)
The recommendation to develop the MOU came from a 2009 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report,
School Meal Programs: Changes to
Federal Agencies» Procedures Could Reduce the Risk
of School Children Consuming Recalled Food.
This
federal program allows
school districts to provide
meals free
of charge to all enrolled students.
A 2015 KSHF - commissioned series
of case studies
of 19
schools in seven states explored the effects
of these
federal kitchen equipment grants on students and
meal programs and found that equipment bought with these funds helped many
schools overcome challenges reported in the 2013 study.
School meal programs are self - sustaining, funded through federal reimbursements and sales revenue, and independent of school district education bu
School meal programs are self - sustaining, funded through
federal reimbursements and sales revenue, and independent
of school district education bu
school district education budgets.
The bill would change
federal policy and allow Tribes to administer
federal programs that provide free, healthy
meals to children in
schools, while simultaneously helping to alleviate some
of the hurdles Tribes face in trying to access hunger and nutrition services.
School meal programs are governed by a stack
of federal regulations as thick as a large urban telephone directory, and nutrition directors have to know them all and follow them all.
Every
school day,
federal child nutrition
programs provide nutritious
meals that are critical to the health and academic success
of more than 30 million students nationwide.
The session was a reaction to a study conducted for the U.S. Department
of Agriculture last October that disclosed that National
School Lunch
Program meals do not meet
federal dietary guidelines for healthful nutrition practices.
State law requires that all public
schools offer a free
meal to eligible students even if the
schools do not participate in the
federal lunch
program, said Mark Haller, who supervises child nutrition
programs at the Illinois State Board
of Education.
School decision makers 1) plug in simple information, 2) explore different ways to expand school meals programs like moving breakfast to the classroom or serving afterschool meals, and 3) come out with hard data about costs, number of students served and federal reimbursement do
School decision makers 1) plug in simple information, 2) explore different ways to expand
school meals programs like moving breakfast to the classroom or serving afterschool meals, and 3) come out with hard data about costs, number of students served and federal reimbursement do
school meals programs like moving breakfast to the classroom or serving afterschool
meals, and 3) come out with hard data about costs, number
of students served and
federal reimbursement dollars.
While the
federal lunch
program subsidizes
school meals at a rate
of $ 2.68 each,
schools must shoulder the other costs.
To continue to keep Chinese - processed chicken out
of school meals and other
federal child nutrition
programs, this provision will need to appear in subsequent annual appropriations bills, or it will need to be included in the five - year child nutrition reauthorization bill in 2015.
At the other end
of the economic spectrum, there are some
schools which, because they have very low numbers
of low income students, choose to forego participation in the
Federal school meals programs altogether and just run their own
meal program under their own rules.
But now Representative DeLauro has just introduced the Safe Chicken and Meat for Children Act
of 2015 which, if passed, will permanently ban Chinese meat and poultry from
federal child nutrition
programs, including
school meals.
Leah Schmidt, president
of the
School Nutrition Association and director of nutrition programs at a Kansas City, Mo. school district, said any schools that would consider forgoing the federal funds would have to have very few students eating the free and reduced - cost
School Nutrition Association and director
of nutrition
programs at a Kansas City, Mo.
school district, said any schools that would consider forgoing the federal funds would have to have very few students eating the free and reduced - cost
school district, said any
schools that would consider forgoing the
federal funds would have to have very few students eating the free and reduced - cost
meals.
Advocates can expand the Afterschool
Meal Program and obtain federal reimbursement using proven outreach strategies, including promoting the program, building relationships with afterschool and out - of - school time provider networks, connecting sites to available community resources, and working closely with the state
Program and obtain
federal reimbursement using proven outreach strategies, including promoting the
program, building relationships with afterschool and out - of - school time provider networks, connecting sites to available community resources, and working closely with the state
program, building relationships with afterschool and out -
of -
school time provider networks, connecting sites to available community resources, and working closely with the state agency.
Stefanik and Suzanne Bonamici, D - Ore., gained 15 co-sponsors in December on legislation to expand parameters
of a
federal program that reimburses child care providers, Head Start
programs, homeless shelters and after -
school programs for serving nutritious
meals.
And, in a time
of increasing costs and decreasing revenues, some district leaders and food advocates worry whether 6 cents will allow
schools to serve healthier fare, when the current
federal reimbursement
of $ 2.72 per free
meal already has many
school programs running in the red.
The National
School Boards Association (NSBA) has issued a press release calling for flexibility and relief from the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to address the unintended consequences of onerous requirements for federal school meal programs in the Healthy, Hunger - Free Kids Act with the start of National School Lunch Week on Oc
School Boards Association (NSBA) has issued a press release calling for flexibility and relief from the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Department
of Agriculture (USDA) to address the unintended consequences
of onerous requirements for
federal school meal programs in the Healthy, Hunger - Free Kids Act with the start of National School Lunch Week on Oc
school meal programs in the Healthy, Hunger - Free Kids Act with the start
of National
School Lunch Week on Oc
School Lunch Week on Oct. 13.