A supporter
of the federalist cause in Quebec, Pelletier departed from traditional policy by also seeking to help Francophone minority groups from other parts of the country resist assimilating with the English - speaking majority.
«Barkley Hendricks: «Let's Make Some History»» is mounted in a gallery across from another exhibition featuring some of the museum's vast collection
of federalist era portraiture.
But we must not discard the proven constitutional discipline
of our federalist system.
That has been their intention from the start and so the creation
of a federalist state, which would exert control over national Parliaments, has long been known.
On Tuesday, retiring Conservative MEP Christopher Beazley announced he was seeking full membership
of the federalist European Peoples» Party group in Brussels for his final couple of months there.
So seemingly «weird «legislation is not the result
of some federalist conspiracy or EU power grab, it's integral to the core economic purpose of the EU.
One explanation could be that people can «vote with their feet» in these kinds
of federalist countries.
Six
of the federalist papers are dedicated to taxes.
Nerds who read blogs will note his mention
of THE FEDERALIST PAPERS.
That not superfluous adantage of veneration is the theme
of FEDERALIST 49.
A FEDERALIST 49 constitutionalist admits that most
of the FEDERALIST PAPERS are somewhat weak when it comes to this conservative insight.
Her own assessment of the Cold War was to see the anticommunist crusade as an end in itself embedded in McCarthyism, which was an indicator of the growth of populist lawlessness and a breakdown
of the federalist balance of powers.
By turning Carey's interpretation into an «ism,» Paul suggests that his presentation
of THE FEDERALIST is quite selective, which it is.
To engage in such formalistic rhetoric is to ignore the substantive conception of human nature (and of a natural moral law) that informed the political thought
of both Federalists and anti-Federalists.
Indeed, the history
of the Federalists and the Whigs bears this out - not every minority party eventually returns to the majority.
I think there are two main types
of federalists: the Heritage - Federalists and the CATO - Federalists... Heritage - Federalist [s] are still down with the establishment, the only difference is they prefer smaller units of governments.
Not exact matches
MONTREAL — Paul Desmarais, one
of Canada's most influential business tycoons and a strong
federalist, has died at the age
of 86.
May's election results suggest that the favorite may well be Jean - Claude Juncker, a former prime minister
of Luxembourg and an old - school European
federalist, who Merkel initially backed.
And there was the underlying mentality
of many
of the more ardent Euro -
federalists in the leading countries, including many British, French and Italians; that the coming together
of Europe was a miraculous renascence that would restore to the old continent the headship
of the world.
He'll also have a tricky balancing act to pull off as a
federalist leader with a lot
of former Bloc supporters.
It is possible the process will highlight pre-existing tensions among the remaining EU members — between those states that believe in moving toward a more deeply integrated,
federalist structure, and those largely opposed to further transfers
of power from national to regional bodies, preferring to maintain the status quo — and in doing so hasten the move to a so - called «two - speed» EU.
Deneen's immediate source for the Founding = Locke = THE
FEDERALIST = individualistic techno - nihilism is what Paul Seaton astutely called the anti-Founderism
of his brilliant and wonderful teacher Carey McWilliams.
I know many who have been made into quasi-libertarian radical
federalists by this narrative — after all, if we lower the stakes, surely the fights will grow less vicious — others, including MacIntyre himself, recommend the founding
of autonomous communities with a shared vision
of what a good life entails.
Wills's contention that Madison was a proponent
of legislative supremacy among the branches is unconvincing given that it was the overweening power granted legislatures by the state constitutions that Madison and other
Federalists sought to avoid at the federal level in the Constitution.
And Amar and others such as his colleague Bruce Ackerman (leaders
of what Wills terms the «Yale school
of nullification») have been arguing that the
Federalists were not altogether successful, leaving room in our constitutional government for exceptional moments
of popular intervention on behalf
of a fundamental reorientation
of American politics.
The primary concern
of Brutus is that judicial review is a stealth weapon implicit in the idea
of a written Constitution that would be used by the evildoing
Federalists to dispower the states.
Even the account
of judicial review (sort
of) in
FEDERALIST 78 appears to be mainly a response to the Anti-
Federalist author Brutus.
In the event president and Congress agree, it's really unclear that THE
FEDERALIST thought
of the Court as an effective or even appropriate counterweight.
Mr. Ceaser is so impressed by the argument for veneration that
FEDERALIST 49 appears on the license plate
of one
of his big cars.
One
of the great merits
of Banning's meticulous work is to show the divisions that existed among
Federalists even as they came together in the movement for a new Constitution.
His private correspondence with fellow nationalists (who were coming to be called
Federalists) was extensive, frequently directive, and clearly dismissive
of the anti-Federalist opposition (Patrick Henry among them).
Most
of the suspicious antifederalists were pushing for a Bill
of Rights, while the
federalists, feeling that rights had been assured in the unamended Constitution, opposed it.
He himself finds it in a «
federalist» position that is eerily reminiscent
of Dworkin's (or Nozick's) neutral state.
If it can be shown, after all, that the founding
Federalists were opposed to any government that promoted a particular conception
of the good life, might we not then say that Laurence Tribe's and Eleanor Smeal's defense
of «reproductive freedom» as a constitutional right is consistent with the principles
of Hamilton, Madison, and Jay?
Bork, Arthur contends, is far afield precisely because he grounds his jurisprudence in a moral skepticism and positivism that denies «claims
of natural rights» as discovered, for example, in «Jefferson's ringing endorsement
of self - evident rights in the Declaration
of Independence and the
Federalists» insistence on separation
of powers and the adoption
of the Bill
of Rights.»
Simply put, the
Federalists believed government should protect the public from the worst inclinations
of the powerful, while the anti-
Federalists felt government existed solely to protect the powerful from infringement.
Thus, the «
Federalists» «anti-majoritarian bias, and their commitment to neutrality between competing conceptions
of the good life, lays the groundwork for a Supreme Court whose commitment to such vague notions as «libertarian dignity under law» makes it the supreme umpire in American life.
My purpose, therefore, is not to provide a systematic critique
of the book, but rather to comment on two
of its more interesting aspects, namely: (1) its argument that the
Federalists, in writing the Constitution, were actually defending the principle
of the «neutral» state, and (2) its attempt to apply «neutral state» principles to the issues
of abortion, infanticide, and euthanasia.
And so we learn, for example, from THE
FEDERALIST or from Hobbes that the Athenian assembly was filled with vain and contentious men, men animated by sometimes cruel and often violent aristocratic pretensions.That «democracy» did have the characters or the institutions to support a just and stable middle - class way
of life.
He makes a strong case that the idea
of covenant, drawn from scripture and developed variously in different cultures and societies, is particularly suited to support public, just, pluralistic,
federalist structures within the church and in the government.
Cameron had caved in to a delegation
of «Better off out» Conservative MPs, who said that the EPP was too
federalist» Instead, they insisted, an alternative alliance comprising «real» conservatives, especially from the 2004 EU intake in Central and Eastern Europe, could be formed.
(After all, leading examples
of empirical «decentralization» in today's world include China and France, neither one
of which would be confused with a constitutionally
federalist legal order.)
While not necessarily the best policy, accommodating experiments in the «laboratories
of democracy» represents smart politics: it fits with Republican notions
of states» rights and
federalist self - determination, but is also consistent with the overwhelming support cannabis legalisation enjoys among the Democratic base.
Thus, it's hardly surprising that the
federalist option has been rediscovered as a way to solve the problems
of the «State
of Autonomies».
And the distillation
of the whole campaign into a personal contest between Alex Salmond and Alistair Darling has framed the choice as one between the SNP's catch - all brand
of civic nationalism and a Unionism with New Labour characteristics — at the expense
of putting into play the ideological diversity on both sides, from the environmentalist republican nationalism
of the Scottish Socialists and Greens, to the
federalist vision
of the Liberal Democrats, and the cautious sovereigntism
of the Conservatives.
The other threat to republican virtue in the late eighteenth century, which formed a point
of contention especially in the American context between the
Federalists and the Anti-
Federalists, was the sheer size
of the territorial state.
Your answer is presumably that we are allied with
federalists with whom we we fundementally disagree as do the majority
of the British people.
This could be done by renewing the old tradition
of European «
federalist sovereignty», but in a way that would reinforce rather than impede political agency.
There are definitely some rich countries without a
federalist type
of government and you've shown that.
Although the U.S. has a
federalist framework, since roughly the administration
of Theodore Roosevelt administration and with a larger expansion under FDR, the federal government has been growing in size and scope far beyond what the original framers
of the constitution ever intended.