The Frankel Fiduciary Prize was established to acknowledge individuals who have made significant contributions to the preservation and advancement
of fiduciary principles in public life.
Not exact matches
'» Yet, he said, «the reality
of the U.S. investment system is that it has rarely been dominated by» the
fiduciary principle.
Reading more
of the ICI findings, it is fairly apparent why the rule seeks to over-regulate annuity advisors who are subject to the rules - based and highly regulated suitability standard while under - regulating fee - only advisors by holding them to a subjective,
principles based
fiduciary standard: to pander to the employer - sponsored plan providers and keep money from rolling over.
As «Pioneering
Fiduciaries,» we have a commitment to objective advice, annual outside audits
of our practices,
principled refusal to sell proprietary products — and continuous self - examination.
The now - endangered
fiduciary rule is based on a simple — and seemingly unarguable —
principle: that in giving advice to clients with retirement funds, stockbrokers, registered investment advisers and insurance agents must act in the best interests
of their clients... It simply doesn't seem like a good business practice for Wall Street to tell its client - investors, «We put your interests second, after our firm's, but it's close.»
While the new DOL rules are
principles based and do not provide discreet instructions as to what advisors should do to fulfill
fiduciary duties, industry executive David Trainer said advisors can not lose with clients or regulators by incorporating research into their practice that is «inarguably in the best interest
of clients.»
This is a curious remark as the
principle - based
fiduciary standard has been articulated through seventy years
of court cases and SEC opinions — as a
principle - based standard.
If that wasn't enough, the National Association
of Insurance Commissioners formed a working group to examine the possibility
of state regulators using key
principles of the DOL
fiduciary rule for annuity sales.
This
principle means,
of course, a «one size fits all» disclosure regime is suspect on its face
of fiduciary breach for the simple reason that all clients are not equal in their investing knowledge.
Rhoades, for example, quotes the NASD (now FINRA), as saying «essentially a broker, or agent, is a
fiduciary, and he thus stands in a position
of trust and confidence with respect to his customer or
principle.»
Bogle points to free - market luminary Adam Smith for «endorsing, not only the power
of the consumer, but the
principle of fiduciary duty.»
In addition, the court... [noted] that claims made by Lampack that the contract placed a
fiduciary duty on Grimes» -LCB- are -RCB- unsupported by case law and the general
principles of agency law that the obligations that a principal owes an agent are not
fiduciary.»
[81] The duty
of lawyers to avoid conflicting interests is at the heart
of both the general legal framework defining the
fiduciary duties
of lawyers to their clients and
of the ethical
principles governing lawyers» professional conduct.
Moreover, just weeks after St. Simons and RFF were decided, the ABA House
of Delegates passed a resolution urging all «federal, state, tribal, territorial and local legislative, judicial and other governmental bodies» to support applying the attorney - client privilege to protect from disclosure «confidential communications between law firm personnel and their firms» designated in - house counsel made for the purpose
of the rendition
of professional legal services to the law firm» and to reject any claim that conflict
of interest
principles or the «
fiduciary exception» undermine that claim
of privilege.
This application
of the
principle of fiduciary relationship only at the time
of negotiating premarital or separation agreements creates, as noted above, a dual system
of obligations, one during the marriage, and one outside the marriage.
Mr. Fitzpatrick has considerable experience in all manners
of complex business disputes and has successfully represented individuals and public, private, and closely held corporations in many multimillion - dollar disputes, including matters that established important
principles of law, particularly in the area
of corporate
fiduciary duties.
This general
principle has strong conceptual differences from the much higher obligations
of a
fiduciary.
The Court
of Appeal for Ontario has succinctly summarized these
principles for employers as follows: «[i] n the employment context, an employee may therefore be said to owe a
fiduciary duty to his or her employer where the employee has discretionary power to affect adversely the employer's interests and the employer is vulnerable to the exercise
of that power».
It is Peter's experience that a good understanding
of trust and
fiduciary principles is
of increasing importance in the litigation
of claims against professionals, particularly solicitors and others who handle money.
[ii] The «substantial risk»
principle is the traditional
fiduciary law sometimes called «conflict
of duty with duty» and «conflict
of interest with duty».
[114] Both counsel for the parties provided me with an overview
of the
principles of law governing
fiduciary duty.
The appeal judge found that the arbitrator erred by failing to apply the
principles that inform the remedies for breach
of fiduciary duty when deciding on entitlement to bonus money.
Confirming the
principle found in Canadian Aero Service Ltd. v. O'Malley, that «bonuses are included in the forms
of compensation a wrongdoing
fiduciary is not entitled to be paid during the period
of their wrongdoing.»
In going on to set the scope
of the bright line rule and the substantial risk
principle, however, the Court does not make any further mention
of the
fiduciary obligations
of the lawyer.
Members» understanding
of trust and
fiduciary principles is
of increasing importance in the litigation
of claims against professionals, particularly those who handle client money.
The claims included breach
of fiduciary duty, battery, negligence and contravention
of common law
principles and international law norms relating to the use
of torture and cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment and punishment.
Expanding on these
principles, the Court referred to other cases involving the obligations
of a
fiduciary when transacting with its own clients.