Sentences with phrase «of field scientists»

This gorgeous book, which includes the natural history and conservation status of African elephants and recent surprising discoveries of field scientists, will convince you that the elephant is one of nature's greatest and most original works.

Not exact matches

Out of all 50 states, Michigan performed the best in this field — boasting a 200 % increase in computer and information research scientists between 2012 and 2016.

Alongside field work the team, which included scientists from the WHRC and Boston University, used 12 years of satellite imagery, field measurements and laser remote sensing technology as part of its method.

Even with Theranos» proprietary technology in hand, however, the lack of peer - reviewed studies — the kind of data scientists traditionally use to assess a development in their field — has generated skepticism from experts outside the company.

As a result of that buying spree, Salesforce now fields a team of 175 data scientists that are «stitching together this amazing platform,» Benioff noted.

'' [M] oving our work from the laboratory to the field is not only an important milestone for our group of biologists, engineers, and automation experts, but it's also a critical step in bringing our long - term vision to reality,» Verily scientist Jacob Crawford wrote in a blog post announcing the trial.

Scientists are now eagerly awaiting to boost their newly minted field of gravitational wave astronomy with more gear.

A study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that, when asked to rate junior scientists based on scholarly accomplishments and job interview performance, academics in the traditionally male - dominated STEM fields rated female candidates as being more hireable than their equally qualified male applicants.

Greene said the new hires represent the «world's leading research scientists, practitioners, and leaders» in the hot field of artificial intelligence.

U.S. - born computer science employees are hurt by the influx of foreign workers in the field, but for the American computer scientists who make up 1.7 % of the workforce, wages were depressed by just 1.5 % in 2010, according to Khanna.

Kevin Ashton, a British author and scientist who is an expert in the field of sensing technology, coined the term in 1999 when he was working at Proctor & Gamble to help improve supply chain communication systems.

Harvard economist Kenneth Rogoff, who has debated the issue with Thiel at Oxford, wrote that «the vast majority of my scientist colleagues at top universities seem awfully excited about their projects in nanotechnology, neuroscience, and energy, among other cutting - edge fields.

Scientists can also use these tools to further study the dynamics and evolution of banana pathogens in the field, and monitor changes in their resistance to fungicides.

While the «data scientist» title is somewhat all - encompassing now, Gnau expects that it will that three specialty fields will emerge soon: technologists, who write the algorithms and code to transverse the large amounts of data; statisticians and quantification experts; and artist - explorers, creative people who can navigate content and find something others don't see.

In the field, Melnyk figured out how scientists, by inputting data on their laptops, could improve their productivity and speed up the fossilized process of garnering grants.

«I think in this setting, I would just say that the use of nontraditional collectors — especially in the academic setting, whether it's professors, scientists, students — we see in almost every field office that the FBI has around the country,» Wray said.

To be more specific in regard to Rhei, NASA scientists have known about and worked with ferrofluid since the 1960s, and the field of electromagnetics has been around for almost two hundred years.

Levitt has worked tirelessly to build development studies as a multi-disciplinary field of scholarly endeavour, in which development economics plays an essential role but must be complemented by essential contributions from other social scientists and historians.

Jessica Hopfield is a scientist and business leader with more than two decades of experience in the medical and healthcare fields.

Tomorrow, Ecuadorian state oil company Petroamazonas will produce the first barrel of commercial crude from the ITT (Ishpingo, Tambococha, Tiputini) fields that lie beneath Yasuní National Park, an area that some scientists have called the most biodiverse rainforest on Earth.

The world is full of specialists who turn their love and aptitude for a certain field or product or service into something we all rely on, from scientists to architects to artists.

It's not just the big - name corporations that are making a point to engage the next generation of scientists and innovators — Space Angels - funded Because Learning, previously known as Ardusat, has their own ideas for how to engage students in STEM fields.

The fact is, is that you are afraid that a creationalist scientist will make to much of a mark in their field that people will start looking to them for answers instead of the drival that you put in this video.

Older scientists contribute to the propagation of scientific fields in ways that go beyond educating and mentoring a new generation.

Real scientists who work in the field of immunology accept evolution as a fact.

The author, a past president and now fellow of Queen's College, Cambridge, is a noted scientist «theo logian who has made distinguished contributions in the field of particle physics.

This may come as a shock to you — BUT - evolution could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in court — if it is a «Law» of science and not a theory explain to me why Scientist in the same field have differing opinions theory has undergone massive changes since the 1850's when Darwin first came up with the THEORY — there are a lot of interesting similarities to true science which makes it sound so plausible, but it should sound good — After all the top scientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all preScientist in the same field have differing opinions theory has undergone massive changes since the 1850's when Darwin first came up with the THEORY — there are a lot of interesting similarities to true science which makes it sound so plausible, but it should sound good — After all the top scientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all prescientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all pretty smart

And his book suggests that scientists should address the obvious metaphysical implications of twentieth - century physics: e.g., Einstein and quantum mechanics and the more recent developments in the field of chaos theory and nonlinear systems.

Some scientists (and others in the scientific field, such as astrophysicists, astrobiologists, chemists, etc) have hypothesized or postulated or theorized that we are a product of evolution.

Scientists were left free to develop their respective fields with the use of scientific methods.

Please, I have read about scientists from different faiths (or no faith) make important contributions to the fields of different studies in science.

In this day in which teams of scientists are devoting their skill to the problem of helping alcoholics and AA has achieved such impressive success in leading thousands to sobriety, the pastor examines his own meager success in the field and wonders whether he should leave such work to the scientists and to AA.

And secondly, Stephen Barr's point seems to be a real solution: that theologians need to learn the language of science - not just absorbing the factual evidence of recent discoveries, but also the methodologies and modes of thought that scientists, whether quantum physicists or population geneticists, employ in their day - to - day grappling with problems in their fields.

This is understandably something that can seem a bit strange to those who have not been educated in fields of science and advanced biology, and it is also why people who are not scientists ought not try to explain the processes in simple black - and - white terms.

In the field of biology, evolution may be «just» a theory (as some politicians painfully point out), but it is the theory subscribed to, for good reason, by every real scientist in every established university in the Western world.

The striking progress of the physical scientists has also given them a degree of prestige which has invited admiration and emulation by workers in other fields.

99.95 % of ALL relevant scientists in the fields related to evolution agree that the Theory of Evolution describes the diversification of life on earth.

In fact, scientists have copied nature to produce machines, there is a field of study its called biomimicry, and its a science, who did it first?

Theologians and scientists who do not wish to go this far have proposed two other models: a «separation» model of mutual respect between science and religion and a «dialogue and engagement» approach that says comparing the two fields is valid.

It's called «abiogenesis,» and it's an extremely fascinating field with a number of really smart scientists looking for possible answers.

One discussion of his ideas lists thirty - six reviews of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions in journals whose fields range from philosophy and science to psychology and sociology.16 Many scientists feel at home in the volume because it gives frequent concrete examples from the history of science and seems to describe science as they know it.

No serious scientist out there actually believes that they've learned all that is knowable within their field of study, and that they have all the answers, like some religious folks seem to insist upon.

[39] Falk was critical of Meyer's declaration of scientists, such as Michael Lynch, being wrong without Meyer conducting any experiments to falsify the established work in the field.

The difficulty was, that to say so, even for a scientist with the factsat his fingertips, was to go against a powerful and intolerant conventional wisdom: «We liberals», he wrote, «who work in the fields of global HIV / AIDS and family planning take terrible professional risks if we side with the pope on a divisive topic such as this.

You have been told repeatedly thay 99.95 % of all scientists in the relevant fields state evolution is a fact.

The vivid awareness of relationships, arising from field theory, has alerted the modern scientist to the complexity of the phenomena in nature to a degree that has made him cautious about employing his findings for any generalized law beyond the status of a working proposition.

@Robert Must be the same cabal that's got all those thousands of scientists from various fields of study falsfiying the results of tens of thousands of experiments that prove the validity of the Theory of Evolution.

Scientists committed to philosophical naturalism do not claim to have found the precise answer to every problem, but they characteristically insist that they have the important problems sufficiently well in hand that they can narrow the field of possibilities to a set of naturalistic alternatives.

Bulletin editorials have criticized the tendency of scientists to become «morally irresponsible stooges in a science factory»; and yet they have recognized that in pure research and even in some applied fields it is impossible to predict all uses of new discoveries, much less what their wider effects will be.

it doesn't take a rocket scientist to recognize straying to far a field into humanistic interpretation of revelation (there is an oxymoron) we can drift way off course.