Instead
of fighting against each other, you work together under the guidance of an informed divorce mediator.
The competition consists
of fighting against other hopeful chefs in cook - offs.
They all kind
of fight against each other for a gorgeously shot, kind of ridiculous series that struggles to define itself, the same way Lenny does, at one point bellowing, «I am a contradiction.»
Dragon Ball FighterZ has a few different game modes outside
of fighting against others in local or online multiplayer, but not all of them are big hits.
Not exact matches
«I'm
fighting a battle
against a horrible group
of deep - seated people — drain the swamp — that are coming up with all sorts
of phony charges
against me and they're not bringing up real charges
against the
other side,» the president said.
In some industries, you have to
fight against decades
of inertia and sluggish progress; in
others, you have to
fight traditionalism and entrenched modes
of thinking.
The Canadian government is buoyed by
other recent developments in Canada-U.S. trade: this week Boeing has dropped its legal
fight against Bombardier and there are indications
of a potential settlement in a dispute over glossy paper.
In
other words, the selection
of leaders, who were strong leaders in a battle
of one segment
against the
other segment and / or inclined to
fight for certain things.
One
of the reasons my Netflix service acts up from time to time is because streaming video eats up tons
of bandwidth, and it's
fighting against all the
other traffic on the net to get to my Apple TV.
It stands to reason that Trump would seek an aggressive attorney, since all
of his
other moves in the last week indicate a decision to
fight a war
against Mueller, rather than seek a negotiated path.
Other legal
fights related to Uber include its battle with self - driving car company Waymo, which is suing Uber for allegedly stealing trade secrets, and a lawsuit filed by investor Benchmark
against former chief executive officer Travis Kalanick claiming breach
of contract.
Lacy, or any
other journalist, isn't what Uber should be
fighting back
against — its target should be the internal culture that has led to all
of the bad decisions that keep bringing it negative press.
That to
fight against one while accepting the
other would stymie the technological evolution
of the ecosystem.
President Donald Trump on Tuesday signed executive orders advancing the controversial Keystone XL (KXL) and Dakota Access (DAPL) pipelines, prompting a tsunami
of outrage and vows
of bold resistance from the Indigenous activists, climate campaigners, and countless
others who have
fought against these projects.
This project won the main $ 20,000 prize
fighting against other 11 pitches during the whole second day
of the event.
If you are aware that Jesus specifically spoke just to the israelites and many
of his various parables were meant for israelites, then you would know the «having an open mind» and «turning the
other cheek» and «loving one another» was also just for jews and he was totally fine with killing non-jews,
fighting back
against non jews and being completely closed minded when it came to
other religions.
Well as heard in the news that those arriving to the west are being well trained on sophisticated equipment's and combat training and then sent back to Somalia to
fight as opposition to prolong suffering for the area and
others sent to lead pirate operations in the area and that is all done to give an excuse for the western Navy to be present in the area as well as to cause the raise
of the insurance premium
against the ships passing the area raising therefore the costs
of commodities as well as an opportunity for private security companies to flourish guarding the passing ships?
History repeats it self... See examples such as the separation
of India in to India and Pakistan but left them Kashmir to
fight over and remain alert
against each
other all those years, then another example is the Koreas South and North, then the case
of Cyprus for Turkey and Greece, planting
of Israel among the Arabs to control, exhaust them, consume their wealth and drain their resources?
It's a way to justify what you don't yet understand, rather than acknowledging that it's just understandable at the moment, and it's acceptance amongst those who think like they do, it's the creation
of a definable «evil» to
fight against (satan, atheists,
other religions, basically everyone except their small group
of like minders... even
other denominations that are nearly identical quibble).
During the Gilded Age
of the late 19th century, Walter Rauschenbusch, a Baptist minister, inspired
others to
fight against the economic inequality
of the time with the «Social Gospel.»
He
fought against the prevailing practices among the Muslims, such as the worship
of saints and
other social customs which had no religious sanction.
On this basis, he
fought tooth and nail
against the moderates in the Southern Baptist Convention or any
other part
of the evangelical world who rejected the idea that the Bible was the Word
of God in favor
of the idea that the Bible became the Word
of God in encounter or contained the Word
of God in some way.
David, I hope you don't mind me observing that your posts seem so much more positive, hopeful and free; as if now you are not having to
fight «
against» anything, the
other parts
of your nature are free to assert themselves.
If there was a little more support from reasonable believers to
fight against the constant intrusion
of their fairy tale in the lives
of others, you probably wouldn't hear nearly as much from atheists.
After reading many comments about the election I think what I want most is to have the «United» put back into «United States
of America» let's all stop
fighting against each
other and work together to make this country the best it can be regardless
of who gets elected next month!
A little thought about natural law makes clear that there is no
other species than man so endowed with the possibilities
of its own protection and thoughtful promulgation; no
other species that can display such a reverence for life that it can
fight against the dying
of the light; no
other that can so protect its weakest, most vulnerable members.
I just wonder why they are not
fighting just as hard
against other forms
of «killing humans» like the death penalty (no one can say no innocent people have died on death row) the poor and sick and many elderly being allowed to starve and freeze because the religious right doesn't want to shoulder that burden through their taxes.
While many Christians in the past have acted directly contrary to those very clear biblical teachings (i.e., the Crusades, etc.),
others have actually appealed to those very teachings in
fighting the tide
of a culture that would demean humanity (i.e., MLK, William Wilberforce, the Confessing Church's stand
against the Nazis, etc.).
Humanists and
other secular groups, many
of whom are religious, are
fighting back
against this assault on our educational and political system.
It is women who are taking the lead in this global struggle, because feminization
of poverty, violence
against women, dehumanizing treatment
of women and all
other forms
of pains imposed on women drive them to
fight back.
Muslims in general if left alone with out your intervention might end up
fighting each
other due differences
of views in their faith, but if west keep on applying pressure causing starvation, harassment and confrontation
against Muslims and
against their faith, this will only lead them to leave behind their differences and jointly or individually confront their enemies, those who wants to deprive them from their rights
of faith and belief and the more they are pressed the more they would complain by reacting and not by words and cries since words and cries seem does not reach, heard or work out now a days since being their judges and executors are all
of non religious such as atheists, infidels, polytheists who consider their vast interests above all humanity and faith issues such as mercy, leniency, compassion, pity, sympathy, kindness all that
of human mutual heavenly code
of conduct.!?
Questioned about homosexuality, he stressed that the Church has
fought more than any
other group in Africa to stop discrimination
against homosexual people, and at the same time he clearly stressed that the family is formed from a man and a woman, open to procreation and following the teaching
of the Catholic Church.
In fact, his biggest
fights with humans have been over their habit
of reacting in fear and violence
against other life forms and possibilities.
«The struggle
against religion is therefore mediately the
fight against the
other world,
of which religion is the spiritual aroma.
But Hitler, on the
other hand, was quoted as saying: «Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will
of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself
against the Jew, I am
fighting for the work
of the Lord.»
More than likely, there's a lot
of talk about loving each
other, but not much about
fighting against sin or
fighting for each
other.
Missing also will be any mention
of the fact that Falwell and
other conservative evangelicals
fought tooth and nail
against the 1978 ruling that stripped tax - exempt status from all - white private schools formed in reaction to integration, calling it a violation
of their religious freedom.
A country which in the name
of «democracy»
fights wars
against the self - determination
of other peoples can not remain a democracy.
In love
of God, God's Angels, God's Holy Books and God's Prophets as Christians, Jews and Muslims which all
of you to become more active in approaching those who are non religious to attract them rather than concentrating on each
other as to gaining converts
against each
other or to
fight in war with each
other but are to become as one or wallies
against it otherwise this country would become a Hell for believers inside and overseas under evil powers?!
It is every Muslim's duty to
fight against unbelievers, idol worshipers, and pagans; to defend Islam; to extend the borders
of Islamic countries; and to scatter Islam to
other places.
The Jews are willing to
fight to drive
others out
of Jerusalem, the Christians endured dangerous pilgrimages not to worship, but to
fight the Crusades to take the Holy Land for their faith, they tortured to «convert» infidels, and they
fight amongst themselves (Protestant v. Catholics in N. Ireland, for instance); The Muslims declare «jihad»
against their version
of «infidels,» and they
fight wars between Shia and Sunni over who should set the rules.
In
other words, even if the Assyrian is in effect the scourge
of God, does this mean that to
fight against him is to
fight against God?
I still don't understand how a population
of people (African Americans) who
fought so hard to obtain the same rights as everyone else can be so
against other people who have the same blood flow as they do, are deserving
of the same rights they obtained, and who should be recognized as equals as well.
Also by many
other verses the Koran literally requires Muslims to
fight against Jews and Christians (people
of the scripture).
Other Christians think that abandoning the
fight against gay marriage signals a lack
of conviction.
Jeremy good message and quite relevant for today God is still looking at our hearts and motives for serving him or are we serving our own agenda as Jonah was.He did nt feel compassionate towards his enemies and who could blame him they had cruelly killed many Jews it was a question
of life or death to his own people.The Jewish nation was no more deserving
of Gods grace than the
other nations that is revealed by sending Jonah to preach a message
of hope and life.Ultimately God calls all by faith in him and is willing to be merciful to all nations and peoples that do not not deserve it just like us it is by grace that we all are forgiven.I am pleased that God is sovereign and knows whats best he is merciful to us.Our human nature is that it is better to kill our enemies before they can kill us and that is essentially Jonahs message that is why he struggled to be obedient to Gods will.Gods message is to forgive those that trespass
against us and show mercy.Its complicated and it is natural to protect ourselves and our families from those who would seek to destroy them but ultimately its about trusting God with everything easier said than done.If it comes to a choice we will have to trust God and ask for his strength because we cant do it in ours.As Christ laid down his life for us are we ready to lay our lives and the lives
of our families as a sacrifice for him.To me that is where the story
of Jonah is leading to we have the choice to
fight our enemies or to love them as God loves them.brentnz
Oh... forgot you Proving... I wasn't referring to what he said... on the surface, it's fine to have a point
of view... whether I agree with it or not... but when you are A) in a position
of influence and B) spending money to
fight the opposing view... and it's to stop two people who love each
other from wedding in the eyes
of their Lord, then it is hate... if your ignorance allows you to think my comments are stupid... so be it... and one last point about slavery... whether it was Democrats or Republicans who supported, or
fought against slavery... many justified slavery because
of their perverted interpretation
of the bible... most people can't tell a simple story from one person to the next... but so many foolish Christians think they know exactly what the bible is saying w / o any doubt... forget the fact that it's been translated and passed for 1000s
of years... yup you must be right that God is
against two people loving each
other... He must have made a mistake with those folks huh?
He was still
fighting to retain what he saw to be the true tradition and meaning as
against other Reformers who wished to «spiritualise» it, and
against the practice
of the papal authorities who had not modified their functional and canonical position.
But the real tragedy lies in the losing
fight that he and
others like him waged
against a modernity increasingly deprived
of spiritual foundations.
In the best tradition
of those with everything to gain and nothing to lose by
fighting, if necessary
against the rules for what they want, the friaries
of Erfurt and the six
other Communities who had joined together to send the deputation immediately sent another two friars off to Rome, with a further objection and request.