Sentences with phrase «of first person view»

And you can immerse yourself in the world of first person view, thanks to the necessary equipment already installed and the included goggles and LCD video monitor.

Not exact matches

Jeff Widman, CEO of Brand Glue, a consulting company based in Mountain View, California, offers the advice to «Put the question first, rather than last» and to «ask a question where people don't need to click through a link to give you an answer.»

«I think he was kind of the view that if he couldn't get a first - class person, he wouldn't hire anybody at all.»

A first impression sets the stage for how people view you in the future, and there's nothing you can do to change that: This is a direct byproduct of the way the human brain stores information.

Partner with thought leaders in your industry to gain first - person points of view on ways to connect with and develop relationships with Latinas.

«We're taking a cautionary view for the first three years,» says Hilmar Pétursson, CEO of CCP Games, which has 40 people in three studios working on VR projects.

Trump's retweeting of the Britain First leader was universally condemned by British leaders, including Sajid Javid, a cabinet minister of Muslim heritage: «So POTUS has endorsed the views of a vile, hate - filled racist organization that hates me and people like me.

The technology is deployed in production across an array of fieldwork, heavy manufacturing, and warehousing environments, augmenting workers» experiences with custom voice and gesture - driven apps, and providing HD audio and video feeds for a first - person view into everything from field service training to constructing jet engines.

Perhaps that shouldn't be surprising, since Facebook says you pay for a «view» when a video is displayed in a user's news feed for 3 seconds or more, even if the person doesn't actually click on the video to watch with the sound turned on, while YouTube says you pay for a «view» when a viewer watches 30 seconds of your video — or the duration if it's shorter than 30 seconds — or engages with your video, whichever comes first.

Battlezone — the original 1980 arcade classic from Atari, not Activision's 1998 strategy game — is considered by some to be the first virtual reality arcade game, thanks to its use of pseudo-3D graphics in a first - person perspective, as well as viewing «goggles» that the player put their face into.

Elon Musk's latest Instagram post included an instance of self - trolling and a rare, first - person view of a Tesla inside a Boring Co. test tunnel.

Elon Muskâ $ ™ s latest Instagram post included an instance of self - trolling and a rare, first - person view of a Tesla inside a Boring Co....

Once in a while, people are given a third - person point of view and are asked by the author to act on that knowledge, but for the most part, we are stuck in first - person.

If you have a problem with people «taking over» something, then you have a misguided view of what ministry is supposed to be in the first place.

The Public Order Act, argues Rod Liddle, source of the first story, «is used... to criminalise people who express inconvenient political views».

Some of the sayings seem to distinguish clearly between Jesus and the celestial figure so named; one or two might almost be translated «man» in general, or «men»; some of them identify Jesus with a celestial apocalyptic figure of the end of days to such an extent that the term is little more than an equivalent for the first person singular; and others view the celestial figure almost without reference to Jesus.

First of all, for even the young earth people (of which I am one) do not hold to the six thousand year view.

Scot McKnight was the first person to draw my attention to the fact that «anyone who thinks it is wrong for a woman to teach in a church can be consistent with that point of view only if they refuse to learn from women scholars» (The Blue Parakeet, p. 148).

Jennifer Roback Morse of the Acton Institute points out on their website that, in the very first paragraph of the encyclical we discover that «Benedict's perspective on Truth has its own view of human freedom as well as of the human good: «Each person finds his good by adherence to God's plan for him, -LSB-...] in this plan, he finds his truth, and through adherence to this truth he becomes free.»»

This is the point of view of an elitist from the first world with total disregard to the circu.mstances of lots and lots of people in much more difficult circ.umstances in the rest of the world who have neither the leisure time, education, literacy, or resources to «study» any religion, let alone choose yours to study.

I explain my view of salvation here https://lotharlorraine.wordpress.com/2013/08/30/salvation-by-love-erlosung-durch-die-liebe-unten/ Augustine was the first Christian to teach that God predetermined most people to eternally suffer in hell.

That is, they have set aside the traditional understanding of God as a unique spiritual substance in which all three persons somehow share and have moved to a more contemporary understanding of God as an interpersonal process or a community of three coequal persons.1 In effect, they have abandoned the Aristotelian world view in which individual substance was the first category of being and have accepted (even for the doctrine of God) a process understanding of reality.

Still, if the amended rule is imperfect, it is nevertheless more workable than the golden rule — first, because it acknowledges that people are different, and second, because it provides explicitly for taking the other person's point of view into account.

BREAKING: Some people may find my appointment «difficult», admits the new Bishop of London - the first woman to take up the role - as she pledges to be «respectful» of such views.

In order to counter this limitation of the third - person perspective, it is necessary to imaginatively assume a first - person point of view.

The enlightenment experience itself is an uncovering of what has always been present from a first - person point of view.

A realistic appraisal of human nature leads to a view of democracy as a dyke against the flood of self - interest, as a means of approaching basic justice in relationships between people who are by nature inclined toward injustice because they look first to their own advantage.

Please don't listen to these people on here they have so many different views and ideas of their own but don't listen to them they have closed their heart to God and are doing Satans work of misleading people away from the Almighty they look for men who like to have their ears tickled so don't take mine our anyone else's word for it look it up for your self history attests to the bible as true and The writings of Moses is far older than anything they have ever found thats right Moses wrote the first parts in the bible 3,500 years ago The scriptures weren't inspired by Pagan stories Pagan stories was inspired by actual events just like those in the bible because if you notice that a lot of the stories found in the bible have a lot to do about people worshipping false Gods.

For example, people reading this exchange with a view to assessing the validity of Madden's criticisms of my position and the soundness of my rebuttal are acting on one of practical reason's per se nota first principles» namely, that intellectual understanding of matters such as those under discussion is something worth having and expending time and effort to achieve.

As far as attending the marriage ceremony of gay people i have two points of view the first is that that is there choice to live how they want to but to me that is clearly not Gods best and sin is sin and needs to be repented of but that is my standard not theres.As far as divorced people remarrying why shouldnt they if they have repented of there past God forgives them not condemns them.As he said to the women caught in adultery do they condemn you and she answers no and he says and neither do i.Go and sin no more.This was not just for the women causght in adultery this lesson was for every one of us he was addressing our sin publically for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God that being his son Jesus Christ he is telling us that we must make the same decision to go and sin no more to repent in our hearts and the only way to do that is to give our hearts and lives totally to Jesus Christ other wise we are no better than the hypocrites in JESUS day.brentnz

You may be the first person who challenges an incorrect or extreme view someone holds, and even if they react with disgust and anger at first, your words could be the beginning of a positive shift.

Great, evangelism is preaching the gospel, not coming to church, this can be done outside of church What if the people in church viewed themselves first and foremost as missionaries?

It is not my purpose to argue for the correctness of one or the other view of education, only to note that these are issues over which reasonable people may differ, and to question whether the State has a right to impose the first approach in the face of opposition from parents.

The charity said if people spot those signs in their child, the first step is to keep lines of communication open and try to see things from the child's point of view.

This is a good first step and I am glad that they took it, but let's see what else they do to counter the years of using their faith to demonize a group of people who are different and don't subscribe to their view of the world and what they think is «moral».

That's not the first or only time these men address God, Christ, and heaven, but rather that is the public view of a deep and daily walk and relationship these people have with their Lord.

substantial, in part because of the political ties of many of its preachers, beginning with their support of a number of conservative causes and candidates in l980, but also because they galvanized strong support from a relatively small group of people who for the first time found a national public articulation of their views.

But the traditionalist view again lost the day, with the result that the new religious orientation included the separation of church and state (Jefferson and Madison), a democratic faith in the common person (Jacksonian democracy), and acceptance of a new romanticism which brought about a flourishing of the first truly national literature, art, and architecture.

David L. Schindler criticizes the liberal view of the human person that he sees encoded into the American project in First Things, to which Richard John Neuhaus responded with a more positive view of our national heritage, in which religious faith and a strong tradition of civic associations moderate the excesses of liberal individualism.

I make these general remarks about the two sorts of judgment, because there are many religious persons — some of you now present, possibly, are among them — who do not yet make a working use of the distinction, and who may therefore feel at first a little startled at the purely existential point of view from which in the following lectures the phenomena of religious experience must be considered.

The only one who can not is Lucifer because he do not want to, God heart is not made of iron, if there are evil people alive in this world it is only because God want them to repent to, there are most evil people who as a children or teenager was sweet but because of another being became evil, Only God know what it did make them change or their pain but only one things is sure as God he did have the first seat to see all their pain and live, and to my point of view as a Father it is by no means lesser than the pain he did feel for them or them victimes, like a electric chair.

An ICM / BBC3 survey conducted last April revealed that one in four young people had viewed online porn by the age of 12, with around 7 % saying they were under ten when they were first exposed to it.

First in our consideration of the process - relational view of the self is the assertion that the human person is a highly complex psycho - physical organism.

Perhaps it is this Eurocentric view that leads Newbigin to claim that Christian missions have created a revolution of expectations in the relevant societies, giving the people for the first time a sense of history.

First, in view of the appalling gap separating Christ's example and our performance, we church people — conservatives and liberals alike — need to declare a moratorium on pious platitudes, admit our hypocrisies, and re-examine what we really are living for in the context of Christ's imperatives.

I don't see christian churches teaching people to stone anyone anymore, just to legislate against them (stomping on the first ammendment in the process) in hopes that they can ignore the reality of others not agreeing with everything they say, or not behaving in what they view as the right way.

In his extended review of Stratford Caldecott's The Radiance of Being (May / June issue), Fr Hugh Mackenzie contrasts that book's espousal of «the «Renaissance - Platonic» view of the human person as body - soul - spirit» with the Faith movement's prioritising of mind as the metaphysical first principle.

First, when offering criticism it is important to give the most charitable reading of a person's views — even when you critique them.

Stated another way, in the NLRB's view the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment doesn't seem to protect religious institutions that have as part of their mission outreach and engagement with people of other faiths and no faith.

I hope that I may be forgiven for using the first person singular in this article, when expressing my own views, in place of the more conventional and less stark editorial «we.»