Sentences with phrase «of flawed arguments»

Richard Janda, who has addressed many of the flawed arguments used in Bill C - 300's defeat, states,

To justify their low offers, adjustors and defense lawyers have a variety of flawed arguments to claim they can only pay you a small fraction of what your case is worth.

Personal attacks, accusations of dishonesty, alleged use of flawed arguments for failing to mention this or that detail in a presentation for a non-technical audience... difficult to believe that it's all just about atmospheric physics, isn't it?

You: Misuse words and accuse me of fallacious arguing without actually providing examples of my flawed arguments.

You haven't thought out any of the flawed arguments of evolution or the big bang theory to it's conclusion.

«I think Taylor is brilliant but I think that's sort of a flawed argument,» Carter said during an interview at an annual conference in San Francisco hosted by tech news site TechCrunch.

Lengthy post by Rainer Braendlein contains a thinly veiled form of the flawed argument known as Pascal's Wager.

Post by Iroy contains instances of confirmation bias and concludes with a form of the flawed argument known as Pascal's Wager.

Post by «Rainer Braendlein» concludes with a threatening form of the flawed argument known as Pascal's Wager.

Not exact matches

A parade of reports and experts explained away high house prices and debt levels with many of the same arguments we hear today in Canada — yes, prices are way up compared to rents, but the analysis is built on flawed data; debt levels are high, but so are house prices, which minimizes the risk; America's demographics support the boom; and then the classic: There'll be a soft landing.

However, one of the other signers of the declaration, Thomas McKean, denied the July 4th signing date and backed it up by illustrating a glaring flaw in Jefferson's, Adams», and Franklin's argument — namely, that most of the signers were not members of congress on July 4th and thus wouldn't have been there to sign it.

Americans for Annuity Protection has engaged in active outreach to leaders of influence to establish the argument that the DOL's fiduciary rule should be returned because of the analysis performed by the department is flawed, inconclusive and arbitrary; it is not compatible with the Uniform Security Law or established insurance law, and the law has potential conflict with the Dodd - Frank requirements to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on reviewing a uniform fiduciary standard.

However, my main bone of contention isn't with the fatally - flawed argument that a gold shortage is looming.

Your probability argument is based on a flawed understanding of statistics.

I also don't think I need to point out to you that using only part of a definition fundamentally changes the word and definition itself, so to take only parts out to prove what atheism does do as «religious» is flawed and destroys your argument.

The study of Epistemology reveals that all sources of knowledge are flawed — authority, the 5 senses, memory, intuition, and logic (a counter argument for every argument).

William Paley's Divine Watchmaker argument is a flawed argument that contains instances of the Ad Ignorantiam fallacy and other basic fallacies.

The crux of Hobby Lobby's argument is flawed.

You'd think you'd have a better handle on the issue before you made fun of someone else for having a «flawed argument».

Anyone with half a brain can come up with all sorts of reasons why this argument is flawed.

ALL of your arguments are flawed in the same way (see No True Scotsman Fallacy).

Which is exactly why every time you post the garbage you learned in those classes, it gets destroyed, showing the flaws in the basic premises, destroying the integrity of the argument.

your role now as atheist, is to be the opposing argumenter for the modern day change process or evolution of the present religion from monotheism which you have shown in your arguments to be flawed so that the future faithfuls will shift to the ultra modern faith called PANTHROTHEISM - the synthesis of theistic monotheism vs.humanistic atheism.I suggest to you to be more aggressive and conscise in your arguments, God needs you

Your argument has a couple of flaws.

I will say that I've heard the argument that Jesus must have been insane — this is a flawed theory, because a lot of impartial observers reported the same events his own followers recorded.

Assume for the sake of argument that the designer must be intelligent (ignoring of course many designs / results which from our own experience are flawed or counterproductive) 3.

Ahh, no problem Bob, trust me I did not believe that the pro-choice would think of my argument as anything but flawed just as the pro-life side would think of any of the pro-choice arguments as anything but flawed.

I merely showed that the foundation and frame of the first cause argument are all logically flawed.

Hence some aethiest stop sounding logical once you point out any flaws in their arguments because at this point their merely defending their beliefs and not really trying to have some sort of logical discussion.

Hence some believers stop sounding logical once you point out any flaws in their arguments because at this point their merely defending their beliefs and not really trying to have some sort of logical discussion.

Secondly that logic is flawed as an argument against the removal of government endorsement of religion because nobody is asking the government to endorse rejection of religion either.

Some of the other arguments are flawed as well such as there must have been something with the desire to create or nothing would have been created.

Indeed, they are likely to conclude that we hardly need a philosopher of Anscombe's status to disprove Lewis; for Wilson writes that «any dispassionate reader can at once see many flaws in Lewis's arguments here.»

«many pro-life advocates unwittingly allow this flawed anthropology (of our contemporaries) to prosper because they do not offer any proof or argument for the existence of the spiritual soul, which is the only rational ground for uniquely human personhood».

matter of fact — That is a flawed argument.

But both are fitting enterprises of public theology in the political mode, however flawed the justifying arguments may be.

not only does this author abuse the scripture, he points out the «pick and choose» flaws in many of these arguments... and then goes on to only use one verse himself... LOL this guy should right Obama's speeches.

He makes sweeping generalizations about the core beliefs of «spiritual, not religious» people to support the argument that their flaw is that they don't have core beliefs.

leave it to atheists to focus on small matters like consistency... sign of a weak argument pointing out flaws in The Unalterable Word of the Almighty!

This feeling was shared by many who pointed out flaws in Dawkins» arguments or, at the very least, questioned the certainty the scientist holds that all religion is a load of rubbish.

So - what if they accept flaws in their argument (which I usually get them to do), they ignore the flaws (because, as they say, I have the burden of proof), and begin their arguments on the offensive.

From where I sit — which is not as a scholar of the law, but as a reporter of facts — «the law is the law» argument has two fundamental flaws.

Corrington documented the way the female has been excluded from the personae of the deity in Christianity, detailing the numerous arguments that present the female nature as flawed and limited.

But these formal flaws in Taylor's argument are not the main difficulty of the book.

The watchmaker argument is flawed in that equates something that does not occur in nature, and applies the logic of design and purpose onto nature in a very arbitrary way.

Your argument is flawed, so either address it or drop it, otherwise you merely show your own dishonest style of conversation.

Christian addresses seven flaws in the atheists» arguments for the non-existence of «that Loser,» the «biggest fraud of all time, cosmic zero, ultimate no - show» — sexual liberty, reason and logic, good works, art, converts to Christianity, the human family, and life issues.

I am not suggesting that the decision to end Ms. Busalacchi's life was the right one, but I am suggesting that Ms. Harvey's argument is flawed and, as such, contributes to the pile of emotion - laden rhetoric clogging the channels of genuine moral and theological debate.

He keeps making this same flawed argument, like his other flawed arguments, over and over in hopes that his audience will get tired of giving the routine refutation and let his comments slide, which he takes as a «win», also like Craig.

I was just stressing that the root of Christianity is an admittance of sin, and striving to be perfect, - but we can't ignore that Christians are human and flawed also - hence, the Christians are hypocritical argument